Dimensions of similarity in the mental lexicon

References

• Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56. doi:10.1177/00238309040470010201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3048–3058. doi:10.1121/1.2188331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 527–554. doi:10.1080/01690960802299378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Buz, E., Jaeger, T. F., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Contextual confusability leads to targeted hyperarticulation. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1970–1975). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Caselli, N. K., Caselli, M. K., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2015). Inflected words in production: Evidence for a morphologically rich lexicon. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–23. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1054847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., & Howsum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke, M. (2013). Phonological encoding and phonetic duration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2015). Lexical competition in vowel articulation revisited: Vowel dispersion in the Easy/Hard database. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 96–116. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 789–806. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop's neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113–134. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219–260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Vaughn, C., & Murphy, A. (2013). The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, EL172–EL177. doi:10.1121/1.4812821
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. L., Yiu, L. K., Watson, D. G., & Dell, G. S. (2015). Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirov, C., & Wilson, C. (2012). The specificity of online variation in speech production. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 587–592). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt, D. H. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 18, 686–706. doi:10.1044/jshr.1804.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(2), 119–131. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80001-5
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle, & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16
   Google Scholar
• Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. doi:10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048–1058. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/078)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528–537. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VII (pp. 101–140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2014). Effect of sound similarity and word position on lexical selection. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1325–1341. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.917193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173–200. doi:10.1080/016909699386338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561–572. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roon, K. D., & Gafos, A. I. (2015). Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: Beyond phonemic identity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 242–250. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0666-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, R. A. (2010). Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels. In L. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, & C. T. Best (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 (pp. 557–586). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Schertz, J. (2013). Exaggeration of featural contrasts in clarifications of misheard speech in English. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 249–263. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735–747. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI (pp. 26–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S. (2009). The structure and nature of phonological neighbourhoods in children's early lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 36(01), 3–21. doi:10.1017/S0305000908008829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar