The impact of notional number and grammatical gender on number agreement with conjoined noun phrases

References

• Adani, F., van der Lely, H. K. J., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120, 2148–2166. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antón-Méndez, I., & Hartsuiker, R. (2010). Morphophonological and conceptual effects on Dutch subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 728–748. doi:10.1080/01690960903513818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antón-Méndez, I., Nicol, J., & Garrett, M. F. (2002). The relation between gender and number agreement processing. Syntax, 5, 1–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9612.00045
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W. (2007). A feature principle for partial agreement. Lingua, 117, 1541–1565. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65–85. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L. (2012). Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122, 1053–1069. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject–verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 147–164. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 560–578. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, J. K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531–559. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, R., & Bock, J. K. (2012). The role of morphology in subject-verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 429–461. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.550166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2008). The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 329–374. doi:10.1080/01690960701467993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, K., & Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1316–1326. doi:10.3758/BF03195814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 760–778. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00010-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Experience and grammatical agreement: Statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition, 114, 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, H., Moortget, M., Renmans, B., Schouppe, M., Schuurman, I., & van der Wouden, T. (2003). CGN syntactische annotatie. Retrieved from http://lands.let.ru.nl/cgn/doc_Dutch/topics/version_1.0/annot/syntax/info.htm
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, J. K. (2005). Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 689–695. doi:10.3758/BF03196759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, F. T. (2008). Categorical data analyses: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Shalom, D. E., Sigman, M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375–419. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimor, H. (2007). Conjunctions and grammatical agreement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL..
   Google Scholar
• Lorimor, H., Bock, J. K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., & Beard, R. (2008). Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 769–799. doi:10.1080/01690960701774182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimor, H., Jackson, C. N., & Foote, R. (2015). How gender affects number: Cue-based retrieval in agreement production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 947–954. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1047461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirković, J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2013). When singular and plural are both grammatical: Semantic and morphophonological effects in agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 277–298. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. (1984). Some problems of determination in English number agreement. In G. Alvarez, B. Brodie, & T. McCoy (Eds.), Proceedings of the first eastern states conference on linguistics (pp. 69–78). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanism and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195–215. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740–759. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Koppen, M. (2005). One probe - two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects (PhD dissertation, LOT-Publications No. 105). Leiden University, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442–472. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G, Hartsuiker, R. J., Jarema, G., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 407–442. doi:10.1080/016909696387169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar