Pupillary responses reflect ambiguity resolution in pronoun processing

References

• Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76(1), B13–B26. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00073-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 748–769. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Package ‘lme4’. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 489–506. doi:10.1007/BF02143163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions on binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225–295. doi:10.1207/s15327817la0103_2
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Clackson, K., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Children's processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 128–144. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnings, I., Patterson, C., & Felser, C. (2014). Variable binding and coreference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 39–56. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(2), 247–255. doi:10.1080/14640748008401161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. E., Ferreira, F., & Patsenko, E. G. (2010). Pupillometry reveals processing load spoken language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 639–645. doi:10.1080/17470210903469864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Taft, L., Roeper T., Clifton C., & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 12(5), 421–430. doi:10.3758/BF03198303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17(3), 311–347. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and the development of coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(1), 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., & Spenader, J. (2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13(4), 319–348. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1304_3
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., Van Rijn, H., & Valkenier, B. (2007). Learning to reason about speakers’ alternatives in sentence comprehension: A computational account. Lingua, 117(11), 1879–1896. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvikivi, J., Pyykkönen-Klauck, P., Schimke S., Colonna, S., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Information structure cues for 4-year-olds and adults: Tracking eye movements to visually presented anaphoric referents. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29(7), 877–892. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.804941
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 310–339. doi:10.1037/h0078820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E. (2011). Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1625–1666. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.523082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marconi, L., Ott, M., Pesenti, E., Ratti, D., & Tavella, M. (1993). Lessico elementare, Dati statistici sull'italiano letto e scritto dai bambini delle elementari. Bologna: Zanichelli.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 543–566. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(1), 128–147. doi10.1006/jmla.1994.1007 doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A.-L., … Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 169–177. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), 657–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(3), 197–229. doi:10.1007/BF02139085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spenader, J., Smits, E. J., & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language, 36(1), 23–52. doi:10.1017/S0305000908008854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., Holler, J., & Kidd E. (2007). Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(12), 1680–1696. doi:10.1080/17470210601160807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J. (2012). Pronoun processing: Computational, behavioral, and psychophysiological studies in children and adults ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J., Van Rijn, H., & Hendriks, P. (2010). Cognitive architectures and language acquisition: A case study in pronoun comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 731–766. doi:10.1017/S0305000909990560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J., Van Rijn, H., & Hendriks, P. (2013). How WM load influences linguistic processing in adults: A computational model of pronoun interpretation in discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 564–580. doi:10.1111/tops.12029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijn, H., Dalenberg, J. R., Borst, J. P., & Sprenger, S. A. (2012). Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51134. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierda, S. M., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N. A., & Martens, S. (2012). Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(22), 8456–8460. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201858109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, M. J., Scholz, S., Akyürek, E. G., & van Rijn, H. (2015). Two visual targets for the price of one? Pupil dilation shows reduced mental effort through temporal integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 251–257. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0667-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar