Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials

References

• Baggio, G. (2012). Selective alignment of brain responses by task demands during semantic processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 655–665. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 36–53. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17. doi:10.1023/A:1005653411471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, E. (2007). Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics (pp. 339–359). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, E (2012). Pursuing meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, L., Bailey, T. M., & Grodner, D. (2012). Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 123–142. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 437–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100(3), 434–463. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (2005). A tall tale: In defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth (pp. 197–219.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82(1), 45–73. doi:10.1037/h0076248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 179–236). John Benjamins Publishing. doi:10.1075/pbns.37.11car
   Google Scholar
• Chevallier, C., Bonnefond, M., Van der Henst, J.-B., & Noveck, I. A. (2010). Using ERP's to capture inferential processes guided by prosodic cues. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 125–152.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond, Vol. 3 (pp. 39–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2012). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 472–517. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, S., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2011). Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400-P600 distinction. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 574–579. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D., & Johnson, R. E. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51(1), 6–28. doi:10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:1<6::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W., & Rapin, I. (1975). The late positive component (P300) and information processing in sentences. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(3), 255–262. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90246-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words.
   Google Scholar
• Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). “Some”, and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 116(1), 42–55. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, S18–S29. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1518–1530. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00052-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. doi:10.1080/01690969308407585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304(5669), 438–441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. doi:10.1162/089892999563328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hald, L. A., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., & Hagoort, P. (2007). The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 1146, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantics of logical operators in English (PhD thesis). Los Angeles: UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 11–42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantic-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 376–415. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, L., Politzer-Ahles, S., Gibson, L., Minai, U., & Fiorentino, R. (2013). Pragmatic inferences modulate N400 during sentence comprehension: Evidence from picture-sentence verification. Neuroscience Letters, 534, 246–251. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, T. M. V. (1996). Compositionality (with an appendix by B. Partee). In J. Van Benthem & ter Meulen A. (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 417–473). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. C., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Z. Szabó (Ed.), Semantics versus pragmatics (pp. 111–164). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H., & Chwilla, D. J. (2007). Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100(3), 257–261. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85(1), 1–36. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). The proactive comprehender: What event related potentials tell us about the dynamics of reading comprehension. In B. Miller, L. Cutting, & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 176–192). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Caplan, D., Sitnikova, T., Eddy, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 489–530. doi:10.1080/01690960500094279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117–129. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00086-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(12), 463–470. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83–143). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994–2005. In M. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd edn.) (pp. 659–724). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 324–346. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth isn't too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2012). If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension. Cognition, 122(1), 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstokke, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). A new nonparametric Levene test for equal variances. Psicologica, 31(2), 401–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstokke, D., Zumbo, B., Cairns, S., & Saklofske, D. (2011). The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 16(5), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, I. A., & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85(2), 203–210. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00053-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, doi:10.1155/2011/156869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Geurts, B., van Lambalgen, M., Buitelaar, J., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Exceptions and anomalies: An ERP study on context sensitivity in autism. Neuropsychologia, 48(10), 2940–2951. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Geurts, B., van Lambalgen, M., Kan, C. C., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Defeasible reasoning in high-functioning adults with autism: Evidence for impaired exception-handling. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 644–651. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Hagoort, P., Buitelaar, J., Teunisse, J.-P., & Geurts, B. (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 39(4), 607–618. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politzer-Ahles, S., Fiorentino, R., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. (2012). Distinct neural correlates for pragmatic and semantic meaning processing: An event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing using picture-sentence verification. Brain Research, 1490, 134–152. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, F (2010). Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. (2012). Language-Related ERP components. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 397–440). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. M., Bailey, T. M., & Bott, L. (2013). Possibly all of that and then some: Scalar implicatures are understood in two steps. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(1), 18–35. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. doi:10.1162/089892999563724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158–171. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herten, M., Kolk, H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 241–255. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 485–531. doi:10.1080/01690969308407586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werning, M. (2005). Right and wrong reasons for compositionality. In M. Werning, E. Machery, & G. Schurz (Eds.), The compositionality of meaning and content, Vol. I: Foundational issues (pp. 285–309). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Werning, M., Hinzen, W., & Machery, M. (Eds.) (2012). The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar