Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., & Keller, F. (2013). The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 525–560. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.658072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390–398. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(11), 2095–2107. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1333–1347. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., van der Linden, M., ter Keurs, M., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 530–541. doi:10.1162/0898929053279469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidet-Caulet, A., Barbe, P. G., Roux, S., Viswanath, H., Barthélémy, C., Bruneau, N., … Bonnet-Brilhault, F. (2012). Dynamics of anticipatory mechanisms during predictive context processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 36(7), 2996–3004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08223.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carminati, M. N., Van Gompel, R. P. G., Scheepers, C., & Arai, M. (2008). Syntactic priming in comprehension: The role of argument order and animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1098–1110. doi:10.1037/a0012795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J., Klein, T. J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2010). Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning. NeuroImage, 49, 3198–3209. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2015). The Now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–52. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X. (2014). Analyzing neural time series data: theory and practice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X., & Donner, T. H. (2013). Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(12), 2752–2763. doi:10.1152/jn.00479.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1158, 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61, 150–162. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ede, F., de Lange, F. P., Jensen, O., & Maris, E. (2011). Orienting attention to an upcoming tactile event involves a spatially and temporally specific modulation of sensorimotor alpha- and beta-band oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 2016–2024. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5630-10.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxe, J. J., Simpson, G. V., & Ahlfors, S. P. (1998). Parieto-occipital ∼10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms. Neuroreport, 9(17), 3929–3933. doi:10.1097/00001756-199812010-00030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Singer, W. (2015). Grounding language processing on basic neurophysiological principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 329–338. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, P. (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. doi:10.1038/nrn2787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language, 96(1), 90–105. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalcher, J., & Pfurtscheller, G. (1995). Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 381–384. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(95)00040-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 647–670. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148. doi:10.1037/a0038695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Freunberger, R., & Sauseng, P. (2010). Oscillatory mechanisms of process binding in memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1002–1014. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future, 190–207. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0065
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326–338. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Wang, L., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2015). Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: Unification versus maintenance and prediction? Brain & Language, 148, 51–63. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading. Neuroscience, 169, 654–664. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2001). Regulating action: Alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networks. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1295–1306. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00559-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T. P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295(5555), 690–694. doi:10.1126/science.1066168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E. (2012). Statistical testing in electrophysiological studies. Psychophysiology, 49(4), 549–565. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01320.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaheri, A., & Jensen, O. (2006). Posterior α activity is not phase-reset by visual stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(8), 2948–2952. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505785103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 9. doi:10.1155/2011/156869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, M., & Melloni, L. (2012). Brain oscillations during spoken sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1149–1164. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Maris, E. (2014). Oscillatory brain responses in spoken word production reflect lexical frequency and sentential constraint. Neuropsychologia, 53, 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., & Maris, E. (2015). Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 2767–2780. doi:10.1002/hbm.22806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljac, E., Dahlslätt, K., & Bekkering, H. (2014). Shared predictive decision-making mechanisms in action and language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(4), 424–434. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.791702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, M. P., Maclagan, M. A., & Chen, Y. (2004). Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/0269920031000105336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Dijkstra, T., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2013). Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: Evidence from idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 762–776. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2015). Verbal and nonverbal predictors of language-mediated anticipatory eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(3), 720–730. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0873-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., Praamstra, P., & Huettig, F. (2013). The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 437–447. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, W. (1993). Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annual Review of Physiology, 55, 349–374. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.55.1.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Clifton Jr, C., (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either  …  or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 425–436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon-Baudry, C., & Bertrand, O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 151–162. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01299-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thut, G., Nietzel, A., Brandt, S. A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). α-Band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(37), 9494–9502. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0875-06.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, I., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Cohen, M. X. (2011). Frontal oscillatory dynamics predict feedback learning and action adjustment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 4106–4121. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Jensen, O., Van den Brink, D., Weder, N., Schoffelen, J.-M., Magyari, L., … Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2012). Beta oscillations relate to the N400 m during language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2898–2912. doi:10.1002/hbm.21410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhu, Z., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2012). Integration or predictability? A further specification of the functional role of gamma oscillations in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 187. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi:10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Frank, S. L., Nijhof, A. D., Hagoort, P., & Van den Bosch, A. (2015). Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, bhv075. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, M. S., Foxe, J. J., Wang, N., & Simpson, G. V. (2000). Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific α-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(RC63), 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar