Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon

References

• Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amsel, B. D., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2012). Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1028–1041. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0215-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araujo, I. E., Rolls, E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., McGlone, F., & Phillips, N. (2003). Taste-olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2059–2068. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02915.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1016–1031. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 10, 2200–2204.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=30943&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoń, K. (2015). MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.1.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/vignettes/lmer.pdf doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrn, I., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language – A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, C. D. (1949). A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages: A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burenhult, N., & Majid, A. (2011). Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses & Society, 6, 19–29. doi:10.2752/174589311X12893982233597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173, 1103–1107. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/173/4002/1103
   Google Scholar
• Cabanac, M., Pruvost, M., & Fantino, M. (1973). Alliesthesie negative pour des stimulus sucres apres diverses ingestions de glucose. Physiology & Behavior, 11, 345–348. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(73)90010-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C. (2008). Crossing the senses. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 245–443). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D. (1973). A note on the abstract readings of verbs of perception. Cognition, 2, 269–277. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(72)90035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E.G. (2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 419–422. doi:10.1177/0956797611401755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, T. I., Repacholi, B. M., & Stevenson, R. J. (2006). My baby doesn't smell as bad as yours: The plasticity of disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S., & Downes, J. J. (2000). Long live Proust: The odour-cued autobiographical memory bump. Cognition, 75, B41–B50. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00065-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, F. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2585–2595. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2009). Is a bear white in the woods? Parallel representation of implied object color during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 573–577. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2010). Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words. Cognition, 115, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125, 452–465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam-Jensen, H., & Zethsen, K. K. (2007). Pragmatic patterns and the lexical system – A reassessment of evaluation in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1608–1623. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dantzig, S., Cowell, R. A., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2011). A sharp image or a sharp knife: Norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 145–154. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0038-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
   Google Scholar
• Delwiche, J. F., & Heffelfinger, A. L. (2005). Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. Journal of Sensory Studies, 20, 512–525. doi:10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, C. (2015). Sensory adjectives in the discourse of food: A frame-semantic approach to language and perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Djordjevic, J., Lundstrom, J. N., Clement, F., Boyle, J. A., Pouliot, S., & Jones-Gotman, M. (2008). A rose by any other name: Would it smell as sweet? Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 386–393. doi:10.1152/jn.00896.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dravnieks, A. (1985). Atlas of odor character profiles. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35–68.
   Google Scholar
• Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2006). Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. 6, pp. 417–422).
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1986-13623-001
   Google Scholar
• Fenko, A., Otten, J. J., & Schifferstein, H. N. (2010). Describing product experience in different languages: The role of sensory modalities. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3314–3327. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 41–50. doi:10.1017/S0140525X97470012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4917–4921. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5389-05.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage, 32, 906–912. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, E. (1992). Emotional neurophysiology of the amygdala within the context of human cognition. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The Amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction (pp. 191–228). New York: Wiley-Liss.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, R. (2007). The scent of desire: Discovering our enigmatic sense of smell. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, R. S. (1998). Are Odors the Best Cues to Memory? A Cross-Modal Comparison of Associative Memory Stimulia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 855, 670–674. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9929669
   Google Scholar
• Herz, R. S. (2002). Influences of odors on mood and affective cognition. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 160–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, R. S. (2004). A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses, 29, 217–224. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz, R. S., & Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 300–313. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03210754
   Google Scholar
• Herz, R. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2002). A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: Testing the Proustian hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology, 115, 21–32. doi:10.2307/1423672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12, 249–268. doi:10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun
   Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In: R. Caballero & J. E. Díaz Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (E)motion, and perception (pp. 109–133). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D. (2014). The language of food: A linguist reads the menu. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34. doi:10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (2010). A note on the asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In S. Fuchs, P. Hoole, C. Mooshammer & M. Zygis (Eds.), Between the regular and the particular in speech and language (pp. 235–245). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1065–1081. doi:10.1037/a0035669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Frederick, S., & Ariely, D. (2006). Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. Psychological Science, 17, 1054–1058. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01829.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Guérer, A. (2002). Olfaction and cognition: A philosophical and psychoanalytic view. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 196–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29, 407–427. doi:10.1111/mila.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2009). As well as words: Congo Pygmy hunting, mimicry, and play. In R. Botha & C. Knight (Eds.), The cradle of language (pp. 236–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, D. G., Miremadi, F., Zandstra, E. H., & Keast, R. S. (2012). Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public Health Nutrition, 15, 2340–2347. doi:10.1017/S136898001200064X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381–398. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273–302. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558–564. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 516–526. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130, 266–270. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, L. (1982). Synesthetic perception and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 15–23. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1982-24902-001
   Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (1989). Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 215–225). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, S. M. (2012). # Emotional tweets (pp. 246–255). Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Montréal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Mojet, J., Köster, E. P., & Prinz, J. F. (2005). Do tastants have a smell? Chemical Senses, 30, 9–21. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, J., & Partington, A. (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic—or evaluative – prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 139–158. doi:10.1075/ijcl.14.2.01mor
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2, 1–135. doi:10.1561/1500000011
   Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119–124. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. L., & Heining, M. (2002). Neural correlates of emotion perception: From faces to taste. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 196–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. L. (1987). The central and accessory olfactory systems. In T. E. Finger & W. L. Silver (Eds.), Neurobiology of taste and smell (pp. 179–204). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. P., Strange, B. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Encoding of emotional memories depends on amygdala and hippocampus and their interactions. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 278–285. doi:10.1038/nn1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls, E. (2008). Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95, 131–164. doi:10.1556/APhysiol.95.2008.2.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouby, C., & Bensafi, M. (2002). Is there a hedonic dimension to odors? In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 140–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royet, J. P., Plailly, J., Delon-Martin, C., Kareken, D. A., & Segebarth, C. (2003). fMRI of emotional responses to odors: Influence of hedonic valence and judgment, handedness, and gender. NeuroImage, 20, 713–728. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00388-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royet, J. P., Zald, D., Versace, R., Costes, N., Lavenne, F., Koenig, O., & Gervais, R. (2000). Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant olfactory, visual, and auditory stimuli: A positron emission tomography study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 7752–7759. Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/content/20/20/7752.short?sid=6c64bf70-31e1-4032-89a3-15a41f0b2f49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P. (1982). “Taste-smell confusions” and the duality of the olfactory sense. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 31, 397–401. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03202667
   Google Scholar
• San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., … Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 31–60. doi:10.1515/cog-2014-0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., & Gil, D. (2007). Sweet fragrances from Indonesia: A universal principle governing directionality in synaesthetic metaphors. In W. van Peer and J. Auracher (Eds.), New beginnings in literary studies (pp. 49–71). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E., & Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330–336. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03194473
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Smith, B., & Auvray, M. (2015). Confusing tastes and flavours. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 247–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strik Lievers, F. (2015). Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. In R. Caballero, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Functions of language, sensory perceptions in language and cognition (pp. 69–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Swaab, T. Y., Baynes, K., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 99–103. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00219-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torchiano, M. (2015). effsize: Efficient Effect Size Computation. R package version 0.5.4.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M., & Knapp, M. (1980). Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality-specific cortical association areas in the monkey. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 191, 515–543. doi:10.1002/cne.901910402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21, 123–162. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ling.1983.21.issue-1/ling.1983.21.1.123/ling.1983.21.1.123.xml doi: 10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., & Baler, R. D. (2011). Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: Implications for obesity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191–1207. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waskul, D. D., Vannini, P., & Wilson, J. (2009). The aroma of recollection: Olfaction, nostalgia, and the shaping of the sensuous self. The Senses and Society, 4, 5–22. doi:10.2752/174589309X388546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., & Francois, R. (2015). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.4.2.
   Google Scholar
• Willander, J., & Larsson, M. (2006). Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 240–244. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03193837
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52, 461–478. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/412571 doi: 10.2307/412571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 219–241. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zald, D. H., Lee, J. T., Fluegel, K. W., & Pardo, J. V. (1998). Aversive gustatory stimulation activates limbic circuits in humans. Brain, 121, 1143–1154. Retrieved from https://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/brain/121/6/1143.full.pdf doi: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zald, D. H., & Pardo, J. V. (1997). Emotion, olfaction, and the human amygdala: Amygdala activation during aversive olfactory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 4119–4124. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.8.4119
   Google Scholar