Word n + 2 preview effects in three-character Chinese idioms and phrases

References

• Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: Do the preceding words matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1210–1220. doi:10.1037/a0023096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angele, B., Slattery, T. J., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16, 697–707. doi:10.1080/13506280802009704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   Google Scholar
• Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277–1287. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 classes (R Package Version 1.1-7). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2015). Cross language lexical priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs’. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chinese Character Information Dictionary (Hanzi Xinxi Zidian). (1988). Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Idiom Dictionary [Hanyu Guanyongyu Cidian]. (2009). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29, 72–89. doi:10.1093/applin/amm022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Preview benefit in English spaced compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1778–1786. doi:10.1037/xlm0000013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). How is information integrated across fixations in reading? In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 245–260). NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.32
   Google Scholar
• Gu, B., & Miao, X. (1995). A study on the comprehension of Chinese idioms [in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 27, 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, B., & Liao, X. (Eds.). (2007). Modern Chinese language (Updated 3rd edition) [Xiandai Hanyu (Zengding di san ban)]. Beijing: Advanced Education press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 104–127. doi:10.1080/09541440340000132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20–34. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439. doi:10.3758/BF03208203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1250–1255. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895. doi:10.1037/a0013484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146–1156. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525–552. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1103–1121. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Li, W., Lin, N., & Li, X. (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during Reading? PloS One, 8, e55440. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1409–1419. doi:10.1037/xhp0000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. doi:10.3758/BF03203972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 365–368. doi:10.3758/BF03335168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary [Xiandai Hanyu Pinlv Cidian]. (1986). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modern Chinese Words Dictionary (5th edition) [Xiandai Hanyu Cidian (Di wu ban)]. (2005). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, X. (2015). BayesFactors: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. Version 0.9.12. Retrieved from http://bayesfactorpcl.r-forge.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• People's Daily Corpus. (1998). Beijing Language and Culture University, Center for Language Information Processing. Retrieved from http://www.corpus4u.org/
   Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820–833. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., Glover, L., & Vorstius, C. (2013). Contextual constraint and n + 2 preview effects in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 619–633. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.761256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 230–245. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.Rproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26, 451–460. doi:10.1037/a0021616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2 in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1026–1042. doi:10.1037/a0027735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391–421. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.670143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251–272. doi:10.1177/0267658310382068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
   Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Eds.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 155–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 703–727. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.826258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2015). Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1118–1129. doi:10.1037/xlm0000093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259–268. doi:10.1348/000712605X70066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word n + 1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word n + 2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1669–1676. doi:10.1037/a0019329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Rayner, K., Li, N., & Wang, S. (2012). Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25, 1079–1091. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9282-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192–1204. doi:10.1037/a0013554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (2011). Eye movements during Chinese reading. In Iain Gilchrist & Stefan Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 961–978). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., & Peng, D. (1992). Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 131–149). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Shi, Y. (2009). The production mechanism of Chinese idioms [in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 659–675. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00659
   Google Scholar