Semantic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from brain potentials

References

• Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1235–1243. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review, 113, 787–821. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., & Hoeks, J. C. (2013). A time and place for language comprehension: Mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubic, A., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology, 48, 1203–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357–427. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. E., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641–655. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–495. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133–146. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1219–1248. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 815–836. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. doi:10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O’Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938–950. doi:10.1162/089892902760191153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosemann, J., Herrmann, A., Steinbach, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Lexical prediction via forward models: N400 evidence from German Sign Language. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2224–2237. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201. doi:10.1080/016909600386084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110. doi:10.1162/089892903321107855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulakova, E., Freunberger, D., & Roehm, D. (2014). Marking the counterfactual: ERP evidence for pragmatic processing of German subjunctives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533–572. doi:10.1080/01690969308407587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect Semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326–338. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loerts, H., Stowe, L. A., & Schmid, M. S. (2013). Predictability speeds up the re-analysis process: An ERP investigation of gender agreement and cloze probability. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 561–580. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations. Biological Psychology, 83, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241–253. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434–447. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514–528. doi:10.1037/a0020990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504–509. doi:10.3758/BF03214555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roehm, D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Rösler, F., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). To predict or not to predict: influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1259–1274. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehm, D., Krebs, J., & Wilbur, R. (2012). An ERP study of semantic processing in Austrian sign language (ÖGS): The distinct case of antonyms and classifiers. Poster presented at the 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2015). The P600 as a correlate of ventral attention network reorientation. Cortex, 66, A3–A20. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2014). The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned. Brain and Language, 137, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, D. E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 382–392. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Foss, D. J. (2000). Effects of sentence constraint on priming in natural language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1266–1282. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 343–356. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespignani, F., Canal, P., Molinaro, N., Fonda, S., & Cacciari, C. (2009). Predictive mechanisms in idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1682–1700. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, C. T. W., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106, 150–163. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272–1288. doi:10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar