Semantic similarity promotes interference in the continuous naming paradigm: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence

References

• Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2002). Category activation effects in judgment and behaviour: The moderating role of perceived comparability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 123–138. doi: 10.1348/014466602165090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 604–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009a). Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: A rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza (2009). Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 749–760. doi: 10.1080/01690960802648491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009b). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 713–734. doi:10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Sommer, W. (2008). Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1055–1063. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2010). On the origin of the “cumulative semantic inhibition” effect. Memory and Cognition, 38(1), 57–66. doi:10.3758/MC.38.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(3), 741–764. doi:10.1080/713755907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 415–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 522–530. doi: 10.3758/BF03214366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting – retrieval dynamics in long-term-memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristei, S., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Semantic interference in language production is due to graded similarity, not response relevance. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 571–582. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2010). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E. (2008). Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 357–363. doi:10.3758/Pbr.15.2.357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E. (2013). Long-lasting inhibitory semantic context effects on object naming are necessarily conceptually mediated: Implications for models of lexical-semantic encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 228–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section: Human Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 667–692. doi:10.1080/02724980443000142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2135–2160. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensafi, M., Pierson, A., Rouby, C., Farget, V., Bertrand, B., Vigouroux, M., … Holley, A. (2002). Modulation of visual event-related potentials by emotional olfactory stimuli. Neurophysiologie Clinique-Clinical Neurophysiology, 32(6), 335–342. doi: 10.1016/S0987-7053(02)00337-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackford, T., Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming. Cognition, 123(1), 84–99. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 307–323. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Casteren, M., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 584–589. doi: 10.3758/BF03193889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., Taylor, K. I., Deveurex, B., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2013). From perception to conception: How the meaning of visual objects emerges over time. Perception, 40, 32–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 125–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C., & Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(50), 21442–21446. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908921106
   Google Scholar
• Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of Chipmunk, Cherry, Chisel, Cheese, and Cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 132(2), 163–201. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, J. E., & Martin, R. C. (2014). Lexical selection in the semantically blocked cyclic naming task: The role of cognitive control and learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1372–1384. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 111–117. doi: 10.3758/BF03196474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), B77-B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 177. doi:10.3389/Fpsyg.2010.00177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95–111. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. Y., Kirchgessner, M., & Schnur, T. (2013). The mechanism underlying lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 261–276. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.705861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 13–42. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenham, S. L., Stelmack, R. M., & Campbell, K. B. (2000). Effects of attention and semantic relation on event-related potentials in a picture-word naming task. Biological Psychology, 55(2), 79–104. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00070-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 984–1000. doi: 10.3758/BF03193207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellerstedt, R., & Johansson, M. (2014). Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Cerebral Cortex, 24(6), 1619–1629. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 95(3), 781–787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, G., Jansma, B., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 19(12), 1227–1230. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328309ecd1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2009). Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: An fMRI study using Arterial spin labeling. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(8), 1571–1583. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutson, J., & Damian, M. F. (2014). Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: Is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 872. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Carreiras, M., & Barber, H. A. (2011). Electrophysiological effects of semantic context in picture and word naming. Neuroimage, 57(3), 1243–1250. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Hernandez-Cabrera, J. A., van der Meij, M., & Barber, H. A. (2015). Tracking the time course of competition during word production: Evidence for a post-retrieval mechanism of conflict resolution. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2960–2969. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., Aslan, A., Bauml, K. H., Gabel, A., & Mecklinger, A. (2007). When remembering causes forgetting: Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval-induced forgetting. Cerebral Cortex, 17(6), 1335–1341. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. S., & Medin, D. L. (1997). The coincidence effect in similarity and choice. Memory & Cognition, 25(4), 570–576. doi: 10.3758/BF03201130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(1), 27–39. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00085-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming – evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 511–525. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W.J. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1–3), 1–22. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W.J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38; discussion 38–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens, A., Trebuchon, A., Ries, S., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., & Alario, F. X. (2014). How familiarization and repetition modulate the picture naming network. Brain and Language, 133, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotto, L., Job, R., & Rumiati, R. (1999). Visual effects in picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 674–684. doi:10.3758/Bf03211561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 432–440. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01545-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maess, B., Friederici, A. D., Damian, M., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Semantic category interference in overt picture naming: Sharpening current density localization by PCA. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 455–462. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Why does lexical selection have to be so hard? Comment on Abdel Rahman and Melinger’s swinging lexical network proposal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 735–748. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Garcea, F. E., & Navarrete, E. (2012). Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis: A response to Mulatti and Coltheart. Cortex, 48(3), 373–377. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Comparison and choice – relations between similarity processes and decision-processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 1–19. doi: 10.3758/BF03214410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Lexical selection is competitive: Evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 348–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, H. E., Rodd, J. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2005). Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. Cerebral Cortex, 15(5), 616–627. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 38. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical selection is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., & Mahon, B. Z. (2013). A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(5), 701–716. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.682071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 279–289. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, G., Sommer, W., Zhou, C., Aristei, S., Fuchs, S., Pinkpank, T., & Abdel Rahman, R. (submitted). Articulation artifacts during overt language production in event-related brain potentials: Description and correction. Psychophysiology.
   Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Riès, S. K., & Knight, R. T. (2015). The electrophysiology of language production: What could be improved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Jensen, O., Schoffelen, J. M., & Bonnefond, M. (2014). Distinct patterns of brain activity characterise lexical activation and competition in spoken word production. Plos One, 9(2), e88674. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & van der Meij, R. (2012). Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming. Brain Research, 1450, 87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, M., Schad, D., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2016). Language production is facilitated by semantic richness but inhibited by semantic density: Evidence from picture naming. Cognition, 146, 240–244. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riès, S. K., Karzmark, C. R., Navarrete, E., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2015). Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection. Brain and Language, 149, 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. B., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2016). Cumulative semantic interference for associative relations in language production. Cognition, 152, 20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. B., Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (submitted). The closer the more: Semantic similarity of word distractors enhances interference in language production.
   Google Scholar
• Runnqvist, E., Strijkers, K., Alario, F. X., & Costa, A. (2012). Cumulative semantic interference is blind to language: Implications for models of bilingual speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 850–869. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A., & Hodgson, C. (2006). Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 199–227. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production - picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, B., Hanslmayr, S., Opitz, B., Mecklinger, A., & Bauml, K. H. (2009). Oscillatory correlates of retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(5), 976–990. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2013). Feature-based attention: It is all bottom-up priming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 368(1628), 20130055. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieth, H. E., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2014a). Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2325–2339. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieth, H. E., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2014b). The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1014. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Damian, M. F., & Levelt, W. (2002). Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cognition, 85(3), B61–B69. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00107-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zubicaray, G., McMahon, K., & Howard, D. (2013). Perfusion fMRI evidence for priming of shared feature-to-lexical connections during cumulative semantic interference in spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.848990
   Google Scholar