Do morphemes matter when reading compound words with transposed letters? Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials

References

• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 99–110. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 41(5), 1587–1596. doi:10.1037/xlm0000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H., Dominguez, A., & de Vega, M. (2002). Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 318, 149–152. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02500-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes (R package Ver. 1.1-7). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2015). Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1054–1061. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0752-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2016, March). Embedded stem priming effects in prefixed and suffixed pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8438, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1140769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(9), 1798–1819. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.67243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Iakimova, G., Ziegler, J. C., & Colé, P. (2014, September). Semantic processing during morphological priming: an ERP study. Brain Research, 1579, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2389–2410. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.782326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y., & Grainger, J. (2016). Morpho-orthographic segmentation without semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 533–553. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0927-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blythe, H. I., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading transposed text: Effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2424–2440. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0707-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozic, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. A, Davis, M. H., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1464–1475. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(2), 275–288. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2007). ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters, 419(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coch, D., Bares, J., & Landers, A. (2013). ERPs and morphological processing: the N400 and semantic composition. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 355–370. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0145-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 695–724. doi:10.1080/09541440903155682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(2), 14984–14988. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403766101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., & Sandra, D. (2012). Derivational morphology in skilled reading: An empirical overview. In M. J. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 311–332). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Morris, J., Serota, R. M., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2013, March). Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1–16. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.719082
   Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 75–114. doi:10.1080/01690960444000197 doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 895–908. doi:10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2011). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same – different task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 509–529. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.499215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Molinaro, N., Laka, I., Estévez, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: “casual” or “causal”? NeuroReport, 20(4), 381–387. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283249b1c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeieta, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691–703. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1557–1575. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 559–581. doi:10.1080/02643290801900941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form- then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684–691. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., Naito-Billen, Y., Bost, J., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1–2), 123–146. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.855633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(7), 953–1000. doi:10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Kelment, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107. doi:10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, B. T., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 1983–1993. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–601. doi:10.1037/a0012667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188. doi:10.1080/01690960902965951 doi: 10.1080/01690960902965951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 117–142. doi:10.1080/01690960701579722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. doi:10.1080/01690969308407585 doi: 10.1080/01690969308407585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1612–1627. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., & Dunne, M. D. (2012). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 191–212. doi:10.1037/a0025983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica, 141(3), 336–351. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 209–229. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J. (2012). Sentence context modifies compound word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 855–870. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.706602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decision and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223–244. doi:10.1348/000712603321661903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20(4), 804–823. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146%2Fannurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326–338. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 866–877. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 811–816. doi:10.1037/a0028960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Rastle, K., & Clapp, A. (2011). What do fully visible primes and brain potentials reveal about morphological decomposition? Psychophysiology, 48(5), 676–686. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01125.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, M.-C., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 26–41. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2012). Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect. Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 628–641. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0170-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013) The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 781–799. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.832682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2015). Predicting inflectional morphology from context. Language, Cognition, & Neuroscience, 30(6), 735–748. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1009918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Amenta, S., Morone, E. A., & Crepaldi, D. (2013). Meaning is in the beholder’s eye: morpho-semantic effects in masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 534–541. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0363-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 644–664. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 476–495. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.658037
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a “fete” in “fetish”? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 307–326. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable ? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 813–836. doi:10.1080/09541440802366919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 506–521. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7), 1021–1056. doi:10.1080/01690960802299386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 558–599. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.495482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia, 36(3), 217–226. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00119-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(3), 241–253. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015, October). Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A. D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(6), 717–733. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9831740 doi: 10.1162/089892998563121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 418–422. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17048724 doi: 10.3758/BF03193863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 384–393. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 829–841. doi:10.3758/BF03196438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1–2), 261–290. doi:10.1080/01690960444000098
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 187–189. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00092-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7/8), 942–971. doi:10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi:10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509. doi:10.3758/BF03214555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17(3), 192–193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4/5/6), 482–508. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 5–35. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 2042–2057. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917–938. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.679662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (1999). Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain, 122, 2119–2131. doi:10.1093/brain/122.11.2119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children’s and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 531–548. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.999076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2004). Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia, 42(4), 512–523. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2005). Differentiating lexical form, meaning and structure in the neural language system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 102, 8375–8380. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408213102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Post, B., Randall, B., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Temporal and frontal systems involved in speech processing: An fMRI study of the past tense processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1963–1974. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Meerendonk, N., Indefrey, P., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2011). Monitoring in language perception: electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2350–2363. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 485–531. doi:10.1080/01690969308407586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2015a). Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 586–595. doi:10.1037/xlm0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2015b). Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers’ lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 219–232. doi:10.1037/xhp0000017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Dunabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2009). ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research, 1257, 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Swaab. T. Y. (2013). ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency. Brain & Language, 125, 11–27. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Perea, M., Marin, A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: An ERP study. Brain & Language, 118(3), 105–117. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, C. T. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106(1), 150–163. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, W., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensori-motor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–384. doi:10.1038/203380a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1261–1276. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain & Language, 107, 170–178. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that’s what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig, E., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 412–439. doi:10.1080/01690960802180420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar