The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study

References

• Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 105–123. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1587–1596. doi:10.1037/xlm0000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Allen, M. (2002). Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 125–144. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Kuperman, V., Baayen, R. H., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The hyphen as a segmentation cue in triconstituent compound processing: It’s getting better all the time. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 530–544. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00914.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Laine, M., Harald Baayen, R., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000a). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13–B25. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00068-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000b). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489–511. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1798–1819. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.672437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Iakimova, G., Ziegler, J. C., & Colé, P. (2014). Semantic processing during morphological priming: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1579, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y., & Grainger, J. (2016). Morpho-orthographic segmentation without semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 533–539. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0927-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). “Fell” primes “fall”, but does “bell” prime “ball”? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908. doi:10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 429–446. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Milin, P., Cho, K. W., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., & O’Connor, P. A. (2015). Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 299. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., Naito-Billen, Y., Bost, J., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 123–146. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.855633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000. doi:10.1080/01690960701190215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., Politzer-Ahles, S., Pak, N. S., Martinez-Garcia, M., & Coughlin, C. (2015). Dissociating morphological and form priming with novel complex word primes: Evidence from masked priming, overt priming, and event-related potentials. The Mental Lexicon, 10, 413–434. doi:10.1075/ml.10.3.05fio
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 117–130. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183–192. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(93)90026-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fruchter, J., & Marantz, A. (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 143, 81–96. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127–131. doi:10.3758/BF03196148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323–345. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. H., Lee, C. Y., & Marantz, A. (2011). Effects of visual complexity and sublexical information in the occipitotemporal cortex in the reading of Chinese phonograms: A single-trial analysis with MEG. Brain and Language, 117, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 406–430. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 811–816. doi:10.1037/a0028960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 538–555. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2007). Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 192–198. doi:10.3758/BF03193147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122, 485–515. doi:10.1037/a0039267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506–521. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1021–1056. doi:10.1080/01690960802299386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 558–599. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.495482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241–253. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00028-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Packard, J. L. (1999). Lexical access in Chinese speech comprehension and production. Brain and Language, 68, 89–94. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi:10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. doi:10.1080/01690960050119689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi:10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227–269. doi:10.1080/01690969408402119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D. A., Lewis, G., & Marantz, A. (2012). Disambiguating form and lexical frequency effects in MEG responses using homonyms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 275–287. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.607712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2009). Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: A single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition. Brain and Language, 108, 191–196. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277–296. doi:10.1080/01690960903043261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2010). Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: Activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 875–881. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2013a). Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 223–239. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2013b). Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: Evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 1990–2001. doi:10.1037/a0033701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Activation of morphemic meanings in processing opaque words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1281–1286. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0589-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W.-K., Huang, J., & Chen, H.-C. (2014). Morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing in word recognition and production: Evidence from ambiguous morphemes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 543–560. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.790554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 188–208. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90123-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Taft, M. (2014). Solely soles: Inter-lemma competition in inflected word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565. doi:10.1080/016909699386185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar