Referential and lexical forces in number agreement

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 604–614. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement, and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65–85. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-7). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, L., Levy, R., & Gibson, E. (2012). Verb omission errors: Evidence of rational processing of noisy language inputs. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1320–1325). Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., Carreiras, M., & Meseguer, E. (2012). Number meaning and number grammar in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 17–37. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1993). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90007-k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Eberhard, K. (1993). Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99. doi:10.1080/01690969308406949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., & Cutting, J. C. (2004). Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 251–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 83–128. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Ferreira, V. (2014). Syntactically speaking. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferriera, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language production (pp. 21–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199735471.013.008
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, L., & Bock, K. (2013). What counts in grammatical number agreement? Cognition, 128, 149–169. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 201–242. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271. doi:10.3758/bf03204507
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77–B86. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85–103. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject–verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 560–578. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531–559. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, H. W. (1937). A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (2006). Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition, 101, 173–216. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2008). The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 329–374. doi:10.1080/01690960701467993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60270-4
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2011). Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition, 118, 377–397. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Conflicting cues and competition in subject–verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 760–778. doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00010-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2005). Constituent structure and linear order in language production: Evidence from subject–verb agreement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 891–904. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464–482. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, J. K. (2005). Notional number agreement in English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 689–695. doi:10.3758/bf03196759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopka, A. E. (2012). Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 143–162. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375–419. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimor, H. (2007). Conjunctions and grammatical agreement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (1996). Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time course analysis. Memory and Cognition, 24, 173–187. doi:10.3758/bf03200879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67–91. doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Version 3.1.2]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90011-n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, E. Y., Staub, A., & Sanders, L. D. (2013). Event-related brain potential evidence that local nouns affect subject-verb agreement processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 498–524. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.650900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. S., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2004). Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 1–46. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2009). On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 308–327. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195–215. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740–759. doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 285–316. doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00081-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A., Acheson, D. J., Bock, K., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Effects of semantic integration on subject–verb agreement: Evidence from Dutch. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 355–380. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.862284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A., Meyer, A. S., & Acheson, D. J. (2015). Effects of parallel planning on agreement production. Acta Psychologica, 162, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M. (1996). Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61, 261–298. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00713-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186–215. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 455–478. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (1998). Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition, 68, B13–B29. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00041-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 332–356. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar