References
- Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149–178. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217
- Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 481–495. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0
- Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks benefit from different schedules of study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 281–288. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0676-4
- Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 608–628. doi:10.3758/BF03201087
- Kloos, H., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2008). What’s behind different kinds of kinds: Effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 52–72. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.52
- Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 592–613. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.592
- Medin, D. L. (1983). Structural principles in categorization. In T. J. Tighe & B. E. Shepp (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 203–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Murphy, G. L., & Ross, B. H. (2005). The two faces of typicality in category-based induction. Cognition, 95(2), 175–200. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.009
- Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
- Wisniewski, E. J. (1995). Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 449–468. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.449