The amount and structure of prior event experience affects anticipatory sentence interpretation

References

• Altmann, G., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints. Cognition, 116(1), 143–148. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Jackson, L., & Phillips, I. (2014). Using a voice to put a name to a face: The psycholinguistics of proper name comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 404–413. doi:10.1037/a0031813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicknell, K., Elman, J. L., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Kutas, M. (2010). Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 489–505. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.22). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Ellis, E. M., Evans, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (2016). Semantic structure in vocabulary knowledge interacts with lexical and sentence processing in infancy. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.12554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Sweeney, K., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2014). Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood. Journal of Memory & Language, 73, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Kidd, E., & Rowland, C. F. (2013). Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 350–351. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12002518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R. (2008). Contextual override of pragmatic anomalies: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 106(2), 1038–1046. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 554–558. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00656.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89(2), 105–132. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, L., & Bollt, A. (2008). Three exemplars allow at least some linguistic generalizations: Implications for generalization mechanisms and constraints. Language Learning and Development, 4(3), 228–248. doi:10.1080/15475440802143117
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 14, 289–316. doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7(2), 183–206. doi:10.1207/s15327078in0702_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L., Bootzin, R. R., & Nadel, L. (2006). Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants. Psychological Science, 17(8), 670–674. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01764.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70(2), 109–135. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: A critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1711–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 88–96. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23–B32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2015). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–13. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupbach, A., Gomez, R. L., Bootzin, R. R., & Nadel, L. (2009). Nap-dependent learning in infants. Developmental Science, 12(6), 1007–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00837.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2007). Beyond common features: The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55(3), 196–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 133–156. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. (2006). What this construction needs is generalized. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 368–379. doi:10.3758/bf03193414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukona, A., Cho, P. W., Magnuson, J. S., & Tabor, W. (2014). Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 326–347. doi:10.1037/a0034903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., & Jones, M. N. (2013). Semantic memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 206–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2009). People use their knowledge of common events to understand language, and do so as quickly as possible. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1417–1429. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00174.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metusalem, R., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. (2012). Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 66(4), 545–567. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabagliati, H., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). Learning to predict or predicting to learn? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 94–105. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1077979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6(2), doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Holzen, K., & Mani, N. (2012). Language nonselective lexical access in bilingual toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 569–586. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Ilgaz, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Nicolopoulou, A., & Dickinson, D. K. (2015). Shovels and swords: How realistic and fantastical themes affect children’s word learning. Cognitive Development, 35, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E. (2012). Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5 year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(3), 458–478. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar