‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. doi:10.21500/20112084.807
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (on CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. doi:10.1234/12345678
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5(1), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2280–2290. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 4, pp. 535–556). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudenredaktion. (2009). Duden. Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. Das umfassende Standardwerk auf der Grundlage der neuen amtlichen Regeln (25th ed.). Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 159–193. doi:10.1075/ml.4.2.01fio
   Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 87–107. doi:10.1348/000712607X181304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235–254). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 1–67. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier–noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 71. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Psychology of learning and motivation. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 97–130. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407187-2.00003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 127–131. doi:10.3758/BF03196148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goral, M., Libben, G., Obler, L. K., Jarema, G., & Ohayon, K. (2008). Lexical attrition in younger and older bilingual adults. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(7), 509–522. doi:10.1080/02699200801912237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, J., Würzner, K., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlex – eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 62(1), 10–20. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 277. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V. (2013). Accentuate the positive: Diagnostics of semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4(203), 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading of polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Towards a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876–895. doi:10.1037/a0013484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady, 10(8), 845–848.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 369–391. doi:10.1080/01690969408402124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1–2), 8–25. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.874994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G., Jarema, G., Dressler, W., Stark, J., & Pons, C. (2002). Triangulating the effects of interfixation in the processing of German compounds. Folia Linguistica, 36(1–2), 23–44. doi:10.1515/flin.2002.36.1-2.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds a constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3), 430–454. doi:10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
   Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 644–664. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394–421. doi:10.1080/01690960701588004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, P., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2008). Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language, 106, 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. doi:10.1080/01690960050119689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. doi:10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478680
   Google Scholar
• Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(3), 529–567. doi:10.1080/14640749008401236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, E. (2005). The basic ingredients of lexical access and representation: Evidence from German participles (Doctoral dissertation). Philipps-University Marburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F. (2015). Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(62). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F. (2009). When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375. doi:10.1080/01690960802075497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Preller, K., & Eulitz, C. (2014). “Verstehen” (‘understand’) primes “stehen” (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 325–347. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. doi:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296. doi:10.1080/01690960903043261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, H. (2003). Entstehung und Funktion der Fugenelemente im Deutschen, oder: warum wir keine *Autosbahn haben. Linguistische Berichte, 196, 425–457.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, R. (1996). Phonological versus morphological rules: On German Umlaut and Ablaut. Journal of Linguistics, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1017/S0022226700000785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv:1308.5499. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi:10.1080/01690969408402123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitserlood, P. (2004). Sublexical and morphological information in speech processing. Brain and Language, 90(1), 368–377. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00448-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar