Expression of motion events in Farsi

References

• Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0504_2
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613. doi:10.1080/016909600750040571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M.S. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Narrative structure. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 39–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., & Hadar, U. (1989). Gesture, speech and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 96, 168–174. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1), 83–121. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65–110). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Postcards from the mind: The relationship between speech, imagistic gesture, and thought. Gesture, 7(1), 21–38. doi:10.1075/gest.7.1.03rui
   Google Scholar
• Feiz, P. (2011). Traveling through space in Persian and English: A comparative analysis of motion events in elicited narratives. Language Sciences, 33(3), 401–416. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 41–81. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. In L. Gleitman & B. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of the lexicon (pp. 333–375). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folli, R., Harley, H., & Karimi, S. (2005). Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua, 115(10), 1365–1401. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., Hickey, T., Lee, A., Lim, E., Luchkina, E., & Gibson, E. (2015). Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: A subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages. Cognition, 136, 215–221. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S. T., Brink, K., Bergen, L., Lim, E., & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1079–1088. doi:10.1177/0956797612463705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 633–661). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R., & Papafragou, A. (2013). Relations between language and thought. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 504–523). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göksun, T., Lehet, M., Malykhina, K., & Chatterjee, A. (2015). Spontaneous gesture and spatial language: Evidence from focal brain injury. Brain and Language, 150, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(27), 9163–9168. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710060105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, J. (1981). Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004a). Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 89–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004b). Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karaduman, A. N., Çatak, E. N., Bahtiyar, S., & Göksun, T. (March 2015). The role of gestures in describing motion in English and Turkish. Poster presented at the International Conference on Psychological Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–1236. doi:10.1080/01690960701461426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96, 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K., & Landau, B. (2007). Conceptual foundations of spatial language: Evidence for a goal bias in infants. Language Learning and Development, 3(3), 179–197. doi:10.1080/15475440701360168
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). Whence and whither in spatial language and spatial cognition? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 255–265. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Imai, M., Haryu, E., Vanegas, S., … Sanchez-Davis, B. (2010). A developmental shift from similar to language-specific strategies in verb acquisition: A comparison of English, Spanish, and Japanese. Cognition, 114(3), 299–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture (Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özçalışkan, S., Lucero, C. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016a). Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition, 148, 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçalışkan, S., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016b). Is seeing gesture necessary to gesture like a native speaker? Psychological Science, 27, 737–747. doi:10.1177/0956797616629931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. (2003). Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp. 259–270). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture, and conceptualization. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 507–512). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S. E., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5(1–2), 219–240. doi:10.1075/gest.5.1.15ozy
   Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34(6), 1064–1092. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155–184. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98(3), B75–B87. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010a). Event categorization and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 224–260. doi:10.1080/01690960903017000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouw, W. T., De Nooijer, J. A., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruden, S. M., Göksun, T., Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2012). Find your manners: How do infants detect the invariant manner of motion in dynamic events? Child Development, 83(3), 977–991. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01737.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruden, S. M., Roseberry, S., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Infant categorization of path relations during dynamic events. Child Development, 84(1), 331–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01843.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regier, T. (1996). The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constrained connectionism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Ströqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientations: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225–282). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verkerk, A. (2013). Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(2), 169–217. doi:10.1163/22105832-13030202
   Google Scholar
• Verkerk, A. (2014). Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 4(1), 40–83. doi: 10.1075/jhl.4.1.02ver
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar