Lexical and sublexical effects on visual word recognition in Greek: comparing human behavior to the dual route cascaded model

References

• Adelman, J., & Brown, G. (2008). Methods of testing and diagnosing model error: Dual and single route cascaded models of reading aloud. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 524–544. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using Eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighborhood effects on Nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 75–95. doi: 10.1023/B:JOPR.0000010515.58435.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 90–115). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 424–434. doi: 10.3758/BF03195471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J. C., & Devega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 766–780. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90(1), 393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Furber, S., & Welbourne, S. (2012). “Serial” effects in parallel models of reading. Cognitive Psychology, 64(4), 267–291. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F. (2015). Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Dornic, S. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1197. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 193–210. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 296–326. doi: 10.1080/01690960701571570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: Orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 461–479. doi: 10.1037/a0013480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 974–983. doi: 10.3758/BF03193470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 861–893. doi: 10.1080/09541440903356777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488–496. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(5), 708–723. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning And Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. K., & Forster, J. J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–24. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., Gagl, B., & Hutzler, F. (2013). Beyond single syllables: The effect of first syllable frequency and orthographic similarity on eye movements during silent reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(8), 1134–1153. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.696665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. Advances in Psychology. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62789-2
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2014). The time course of the syllable frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence for both facilitatory and inhibitory effects in French. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 171–187. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9438-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli, C. V., Romani, C., Burani, C., McGowan, V. A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2016). Costs and benefits of orthographic inconsistency in reading: Evidence from a cross-linguistic comparison. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0157457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175–199. doi: 10.1007/BF01067101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Moss, H. E., & Van Halen, S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1376–1392. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousikou, P., Sadat, J., Lucas, R., & Rastle, K. (2017). Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 169–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUETM//A lexical database for contemporary French : LEXIQUETM. L’année Psychologique, 101(3), 447–462. doi: 10.3406/psy.2001.1341
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134–144. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrounias, E. (2002). Neoellinikı grammatikı kai sigkritikı análisi, tómos A: Fonitikı kai eisagogı sti fonologıa [Modern Greek grammar and comparative analysis], Vol A: Phonetics. Thessaloniki: Ziti.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Marinus, E., & Castles, A. (2016). Modelling the implicit learning of phonological decoding from training on whole-word spellings and pronunciations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 49–63. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1085384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Palethorpe, S., & Castles, A. (2012). Nonword reading: Comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10.1037/a0026703
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Checkvocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859–862. doi: 10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., & Kapnoula, E. C. (2013). Exploring word recognition with selected stimuli: The case for decorrelated parameters. In I. W. M. Knauff, M. Pauen, & N. Sebanz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1169–1174). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., & Kapnoula, E. C. (2016). Short-term and long-term effects on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 542–565. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., & Nomikou, E. (2009). Rules vs. Lexical statistics in Greek nonword reading. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society. (pp. 1030–1035). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Orfanidou, E., Taylor, J. S. H., Karavasilis, E., Kapnoula, E. C., Panagiotaropoulou, G., … Kelekis, D. (2016). Evaluating cognitive models of visual word recognition using fMRI: Effects of lexical and sublexical variables. NeuroImage, 128, 328–341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., & Outos, K. D. (2009). Reading aloud multisyllabic words: A single-route connectionist model for Greek, (pp. 24–26). 9th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Tzakosta, M., Chalamandaris, A., & Tsiakoulis, P. (2012). IPLR: An online resource for Greek word-level and sublexical information. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(3), 449–459. doi: 10.1007/s10579-010-9130-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., & Vlahou, E. (2009). A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 991–1008. doi:0.3758/BRM.41.4.991 doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 482. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, A. K., Moll, K., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Snowling, M. J., & Landerl, K. (2016). Same same, but different: Word and sentence reading in German and English. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 203–219. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1136913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2004). Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 13–31. doi: 10.1037/h0087437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, X., Robidoux, S., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., & Marinus, E. (2017). German and English bodies: No evidence for cross-linguistic differences in preferred orthographic grain size. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 5. doi: 10.1525/collabra.72
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, K. A. (2009). Feedforward, -backward, and neutral transparency measures for British English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 220–227. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 225–231. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(2), 439–456. doi: 10.1080/713755710
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 502–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Corpus, 29, 600–618. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M. (2010). The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 836–860. doi: 10.1080/09541440903435621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1131. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar