Zero-Adjective contrast in much-less ellipsis: the advantage for parallel syntax

References

• Altmann, G., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33, 583–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T., van Nice, K. Y., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459–484. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, D. I., & Clark, B. Z. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781444304176
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365–391. doi: 10.1177/002383099503800403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 571–588. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.30. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cappelle, B., Dugas, E., & Tobin, V. (2015). An afterthought on let alone. Journal of Pragmatics, 80, 70–85. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. (2001). The effects of parallelism and prosody on the processing of gapping structures. Language and Speech, 44, 1–26. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440010101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. (2002). Parallelism and prosody in the processing of ellipsis sentences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S., Ladusaw, W. A., & McCloskey, J. (1995). Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 239–282. doi: 10.1007/BF01248819
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American english: 520 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., & Bunger, A. C. (2011). Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 63–78. doi: 10.1080/01690961003691074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drubig, H. B. (1994). Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus. Arbeitspapiere des sonderforschungsbereichs 340: Sprachtheoretische grundlagen der computerlinguistik Vol. 51. Tübingen: IBM Deutschland, Wiss. Zentrum, Inst. für Wissensbasierte Systeme.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2012). Ibex farm. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/latest_ibex_manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. E., & Ferreira, F. (2010). Processing coordination ambiguity. Language and Speech, 53, 494–509. doi: 10.1177/0023830910372499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501–538. doi: 10.2307/414531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559. doi: 10.1007/BF00138988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1998). Comprehension of sluiced sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 499–520. doi: 10.1080/016909698386474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy α. Syntax, 4, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9612.00034
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Munn, A., & Clifton Jr., C. (2000). Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 343–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1005156427600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Taft, L., Roeper, T., Clifton, C., & Ehrlich, K. (1984). Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 12, 421–430. doi: 10.3758/BF03198303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, M., Potter, D., & Yoshida, M. (2012). Pseudo noun phrase coordination. In N. Arnett, & R. Bennett (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 142–152). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Schütze, C. T. (1999). Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunction do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 263–279. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. (2016). Processing let alone coordination in silent reading. Lingua, 169, 70–94. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., & Carlson, K. (2016). Keep it local (and final): remnant preferences in “let alone” ellipsis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1278–1301. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1062526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., & Carlson, K. (submitted). Information structure preferences in focus-sensitive ellipsis: How defaults persist (Ms), UCLA and Morehead State University.
   Google Scholar
• Henstra, J. A. (1996). On the parsing of syntactically ambiguous sentences: Coordination and relative clause attachment (PhD dissertation), University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C., Hendriks, P., Vonk, W., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1581–1599. doi:10.1080/1747210500268982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 99–119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, L. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In R. I. Binnick, A. Davidson, G. M. Green, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 97–108). Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Hulsey, S. (2008). Focus sensitive coordination (Unpublished PhD thesis). MIT, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kadmon, N., & Landman, F. (1993). Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 353–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00985272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P. (2014). Conjunction meaning can modulate parallelism facilitation: Eye-tracking evidence from German clausal coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 140–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2009). Constituent order and semantic parallelism in on-line comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2338–2371. doi: 10.1080/17470210902790070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck, & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (1985). On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 3, 217–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00133841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauner, G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). A note on parallelism effects in processing deep and surface verb-phrase anaphora. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, J. (2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 661–738. doi: 10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., & Brasoveanu, A. (2014). Strict and sloppy reflexives in VP ellipsis. In C. Piñon (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 10 (pp. 251–268). Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Semantique de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Partee, B., & Rooth, M. (1983). Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. Reprinted. In B. H. Partee & P. Portner (Eds.), Formal semantics: The essential readings (pp. 334–356). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, J., Walenski, M., & Shapiro, L. (2012). The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 868–886. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.601623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (PhD thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. (1999). On the syntax of either … or. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 17, 339–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1006046306942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), Handbook of phonological theory (pp. 550–569). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. E. (1984). Gapping and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 523–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2015). The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language & Linguistics Compass, 9, 311–327. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Clifton Jr., C. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either … or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 425–436. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Keller, F., & Dubey, A. (2010). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 333–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toosarvandani, M. (2009). Letting negative polarity alone for let alone. In T. Friedman & S. Ito (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18^th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference, vol. 18 (pp. 729–746). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Toosarvandani, M. (2010). Association with foci (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346, 165–168. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, M., Dickey, M. W., & Sturt, P. (2014). The effect of either on the processing of disjunctive coordination (Ms). Northwestern University, University of Pittsburgh, and University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar