Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of prosody and thematic fit during sentence comprehension

References

• Blodgett, A. R. (2004). The interaction of prosodic phrasing, verb bias, and plausibility during spoken sentence comprehension (Doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession = osu1085953482&disposition = inline(osu1085953482)
   Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., Chwilla, D. J., & Kerkhofs, R. (2010). The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: The case of subject-and object-control verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(5), 1036–1053. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Schriefers, H., Vonk, W., Chwilla, D. J., & Kerkhofs, R. (2013). Processing consequences of superfluous and missing prosodic breaks in auditory sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2715–2728. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 34–44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K., Frazier, L., & Clifton, J. C. (2009). How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 119(7), 1066–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2010). Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(4), 345–374. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Anes, M. D., & Horine, M. D. (1996). Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 273–290. doi: 10.1007/BF01708574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed, pp. 819–836). Boston, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage, 20, S18–S29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzhak, I., Pauker, E., Drury, J. E., Baum, S. R., & Steinhauer, K. (2010). Event-related potentials show online influence of lexical biases on prosodic processing. NeuroReport, 21(1), 8–13. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328330251d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159–201. doi: 10.1080/016909600386084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard, M., & Speer, S. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 153–194. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 45(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401316
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas Nagel, H., Shapiro, L. P., & Nawy, R. (1994). Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(6), 473–485. doi: 10.1007/BF02146686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 413–437. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauker, E., Itzhak, I., Baum, S., & Steinhauer, K. (2011). Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken English garden path sentences: ERP evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2731–2751. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2956–2970. doi: 10.1121/1.401770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(1-2), 165–192. doi: 10.1080/016909696387259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., Warren, P., & White, S. D. (2000). Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 169–182. doi:10.1023/A:100519291 doi: 10.1023/A:1005192911512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Yuan, S. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 574–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, S. R., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 249–271. doi: 10.1007/BF01708573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, S., Warren, P., & Schafer, A. (2003). Intonation and sentence processing. Paper presented at the proceedings of the fifteenth international congress of phonetic sciences, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2007). The parser doesn’t ignore intransitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 550–569. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191–196. doi: 10.1038/5757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain and Language, 86(1), 142–164. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00542-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, P., Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., & White, S. D. (2000). Prosodic resolution of prepositional phrase ambiguity in ambiguous and unambiguous situations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 99, 5–33.
   Google Scholar