The N400 as an index of lexical preactivation and its implications for prediction in language comprehension

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Peled, B.-S. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 359–366. doi: 10.3758/BF03197125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, M., & Kutas, M. (1993). The many facets of repetition: A cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1115–1133. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, M., Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1992). An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 132–149. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.2.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, S. M. (2008). Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from electrophysiological studies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(3), 231–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary, K. K., Schlesewsky, M., Roehm, D., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2009). The N400 as a correlate of interpretively relevant linguistic rules: Evidence from Hindi. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 3012–3022. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394–20120394. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A. (2009). Electrophysiological explorations of linguistic pre-activation and its consequences during online sentence processing. San Diego, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2012). Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading. Brain and Language, 121(3), 226–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61, 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007). Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. NeuroImage, 34(4), 1443–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 321–338. doi: 10.1023/A:1010447102554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Word surprisal predicts N400 amplitude during reading. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 878–883). Sofia, Bulgaria. Retrieved from http://anthology.aclweb.org/P/P13/P13-2.pdf#page=926
   Google Scholar
• Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 140, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1219–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chapman, R. M. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 51–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01069046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699–1702. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2008). The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 1055–1069. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 163–178. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karayanidis, F., Andrews, S., Ward, P. B., & McConaghy, N. (1991). Effects of inter-item lag on word repetition: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 28(3), 307–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb02200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M.-S., Kim, J.-J., & Kwon, J. S. (2001). The effect of immediate and delayed word repetition on event-related potential in a continuous recognition task. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(3), 387–396. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00011-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 533–572. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. doi: 10.1038/307161a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 176–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., Schoffelen, J.-M., Schriefers, H., & Bastiaansen, M. (2016). A predictive coding perspective on beta oscillations during sentence-level language comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 85. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1), 71–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzke, M., Mai, H., Nager, W., Rüsseler, J., & Münte, T. F. (2002). The costs of freedom: An ERP – study of non-canonical sentences. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 844–852. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00059-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. F., Andrews, S., & Ward, P. B. (1993). An event-related potential study of semantic congruity and repetition in a sentence-reading task: Effects of context change. Psychophysiology, 30(5), 496–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, M. E., & Rugg, M. D. (1989). Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: The effects of inter-item lag. Psychophysiology, 26(4), 431–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, H. J., Kutas, M., Chesney, G., & Schmidt, A. L. (1986). Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(1), 75–92. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90022-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Huettig, F. (2017). Limits on prediction in language comprehension: A multi-lab failure to replicate evidence for probabilistic pre-activation of phonology. BioRxiv, 111807. doi: 10.1101/111807
   Google Scholar
• Olichney, J. M., Van Petten, C., Paller, K. A., Salmon, D. P., Iragui, V. J., & Kutas, M. (2000). Word repetition in amnesia: Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123(9), 1948–1963. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, P. L., & Van Petten, C. (2011). Morphological agreement at a distance: Dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential. Brain Research, 1392, 62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Abada, S. H. (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 407–428. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, M., & McRae, K. (2014). Simulating the N400 ERP component as semantic network error: Insights from a feature-based connectionist attractor model of word meaning. Cognition, 132(1), 68–89. doi: 10.1111/j.14698986.1997.tb01744.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87. doi: 10.1038/4580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1985). The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22(6), 642–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 367–379. doi: 10.3758/BF03197126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D., & Doyle, M. C. (1992). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low-and high-frequency words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(1), 69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., & Lorist, M. (1988). The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. Psychophysiology, 25(1), 55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Gilchrist, J., & Roberts, R. C. (1997). ERP repetition effects in indirect and direct tasks: Effects of age and interitem lag. Psychophysiology, 34(5), 572–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01744.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2014). The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned. Brain and Language, 137, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 9(10), 2195–2200. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M. (2017). Two mechanisms of prediction updating that have consequences for the N400 on the predicted word. Presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing conference, Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1368, 208–221. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Understanding sentences in context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 376–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). The neuropragmatics of “simple” utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–316). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Meerendonk, N., Indefrey, P., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2011). Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2350–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1181–1197. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. doi: 10.3758/BF03197127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., & McIsaac, H. (1991). Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), 131–150. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Senkfor, A. J. (1996). Memory for words and novel visual patterns: Repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 33(5), 491–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38(01), 41–63. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not Pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 165–168. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event-related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39, 483–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2012). To predict or not to predict: Age-related differences in the use of sentential context. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 975–988. doi: 10.1037/a0029206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., Schlesewsky, M., Hirotani, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2008). The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese. Brain and Language, 107(2), 133–157. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar