Wait a second! delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction

References

• Altmann, G. T. M. (1999). Thematic role assignment in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 124–145. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 23–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (Ed.). (2011). Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendixen, A., Schroger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26), 8447–8451. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicknell, K., Elman, J. L., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Kutas, M. (2010). Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kretzschmar, F., Tune, S., Wang, L., Genç, S., Philipp, M., … Schlesewsky, M. (2011). Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 117(3), 133–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for one’s age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 417–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. M, & Hagoort, P. (1993). The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusini, P., Brun, M., Brunet, I., & Christophe, A. (2015). Listeners exploit syntactic structure on-line to restrict their lexical search to a subclass of verbs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(December), 1841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Momma, S., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). Prediction as memory retrieval : Timing and mechanisms. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 617–627. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1160135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., & Phillips, C. (2013). No semantic illusions in the semantic P600 phenomenon: ERP evidence from mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1506, 76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2016). A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 577–596. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwilla, D. J., Virgillito, D., & Vissers, C. T. W. M. (2011). The relationship of language and emotion: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2400–2414. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21–58. doi: 10.1080/016909698386582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Braun, M., Wille, K., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1852–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084(1), 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2012). Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading. Brain and Language, 121(3), 226–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61(1), 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology, 48(9), 1203–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demberg, V., & Keller, F. (2008). Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109(2), 193–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkanen, L. (2010). Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category Is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21(5), 629–634. doi: 10.1177/0956797610367751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110(3), 293–321. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. A., Yan, S., Bicknell, K., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Form-To-Expectation matching effects on first-pass Eye movement measures during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 958–976. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8(3), 373–392. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00036-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00274.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115(3), 149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. doi: 10.1017/S0048577202001373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146(1), 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-Enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, I, Bloom, P. A, Childers, D. G, Roucos, S. E, & Perry, N. W. J. (1983). Brain Potentials Related to Stages of Sentence Verification. Psychophysiology, 20(4), 400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. M., & Mathalon, D. H. (2012). Anticipating the future: Automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlanc, D., & Kirby, K. N. (2013). bootES. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bootES/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(20), 8051–8056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1177/0267658312437990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 438(2004), doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
   Google Scholar
• Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis : early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Proceedings of NAACL 2001, 2, 159–166. doi: 10.3115/1073336.1073357
   Google Scholar
• Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2004). On intelligence. New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23–B32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilkin, Z., & Sturt, P. (2011). Active prediction of syntactic information during sentence processing. Dialogue and Discourse, 2(1), 35–58. doi: 10.5087/dad.2011.103
   Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). On predicting form and meaning in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 635–652. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(2), 257–282. doi: 10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing. Linguistics and Language Compass, 2(4), 647–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama, J, Miyata, Y, & Yagi, A. (1987). Sentence verification and event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 25(2), 173–185. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(87)90036-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Lai, V. (2012). Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1104–1112. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Sikos, L. (2011). Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: An ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction. Brain and Language, 118(1-2), 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95(1), 95–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos, M., Vosse, T., van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2010). About edible restaurants: Conflicts between syntax and semantics as revealed by ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(DEC), 1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kounios, J, & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 459–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukona, A., Fang, S. Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition, 119(1), 23–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). Language in schizophrenia part 1: An introduction. Linguistics and Language Compass, 4(8), 576–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00216.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). The proactive comprehender: What event-related potentials tell us about the dynamics of reading comprehension. Gina. In B. Miller, L. Cutting, & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 176–119). Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1130233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117–129. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00086-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 533–572. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M, DeLong, K. A, & Smith, N. J. (2011). A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing. In Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future (pp. 190–207). New York: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0065
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electropsysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(12), 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(August), 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials reflect word expectancy and semantic association during reading. Nature, 307, 161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K, & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem : The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition. Induction , and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/Nrn2532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E, Stroud, C, Plesch, S, & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., Swaab, T. Y., & Gordon, P. C. (2006). Reading words in discourse: The modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5(3), 107–127. doi: 10.1177/1534582306289573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy, R. P. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. P., Fedorenko, E., Breen, M., & Gibson, E. (2012). The processing of extraposed structures in English. Cognition, 122(1), 12–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinás, R. (2002). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, J, Friedrich, C. K, De_Filippis, M, & Kaup, B. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(8), 1355–1370. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, N., & Huettig, F. (2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake—But only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847. doi: 10.1037/a0029284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., & Ferretti, T. R. (2005). A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1174–1184. doi: 10.3758/BF03193221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K., Singh, N., Pandey, A., & Huettig, F. (2012). Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye- movements are modulated by reading ability - evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momma, S., Sakai, H., & Phillips, C. (2015). Give me several hundred more milliseconds: Temporal dynamics of verb prediction. Talk given at the 28th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S, & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi, H., & Sakamoto, T. (2010). Immediate interaction between syntactic and semantic outputs: Evidence from event-related potentials in Japanese sentence processing. Poster presented at the 22nd annual CUNY human sentence processing conference, Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., Lau, E., White, I. D., Dakan, M. L., Apple, A., & Phillips, C. (2015). Hyper-active gap filling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(MAR), 1–30. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2007). Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction or priming? Discourse Processes, 45(6), 464–496. doi: 10.1080/01638530802356463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paczynski, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). Multiple influences of semantic memory on sentence processing: Distinct effects of semantic relatedness on violations of real-world event/state knowledge and animacy selection restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 426–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Hockley, W., & McKoon, G. (1985). Components of activation: Repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 114(4), 435–450. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.114.4.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. P. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A, & Clifton, C. J. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 425–436. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, C., & Phillips, C. (2012). Examining the evidence for an independent semantic analyzer: An ERP study in Spanish. Brain and Language, 120(2), 108–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., & Luck, S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology, 52, 997–1009. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), 415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, D. E., & van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). The neuropragmatics of “simple” utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantic and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–316). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van_Berkum, J. J. A, Hagoort, P, & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671. doi: 10.1162/089892999563724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M. J. Y., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Vissers, C. T. W. M., & Chwilla, D. J. (2010). Monitoring in language perception: Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(1), 67–82. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1181–1197. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 241–255. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2015). Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that’s what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2012). To predict or not to predict: Age-related differences in the use of sentential context. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 975–988. doi: 10.1037/a0029206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 209–216. doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015). Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(6), 648–672. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2008). Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1203, 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, M., Dickey, M. W., & Sturt, P. (2013). Predictive processing of syntactic structure: Sluicing and ellipsis in real-time sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 272–302. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.622905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar