Predictive processing of syntactic information: evidence from event-related brain potentials

References

• Arao, H., Suwazono, S., Sakamoto, T., & Nakada, T. (2007). ERP correlates of the processing of object-verb integration in Japanese. In T. Sakamoto (Ed.), Communicating skills of intention (pp. 319–336). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 55–73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H. (2014). The electrophysiology of language comprehension: A neurocomputational model (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y. (2013). The linguistic dimensions of linguistic prediction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., & Phillips, C. (2013). No semantic illusions in the “Semantic P600” phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1506, 76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C., Lau, E., & Phillips, C. (2015). A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 577–596. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response tomorphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58. doi: 10.1080/016909698386582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentence: Syntactic parsing strategies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: Psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Freunberger, D., & Roehm, D. (2017). The costs of being certain: Brain potential evidence for linguistic pre-activation in sentence processing. Psychophysiology, 54(6), 824–832. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time-course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based onneuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–281. doi: 10.1006/brln.1995.1048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument specific information. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 476–507. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, M. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, S., Tanner, D., & van Hell, J. G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 27–43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668–689. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Sikos, L. (2011). Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: An ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction. Brain and Language, 118(1–2), 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos, M., van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Individual variation in the late positive complex to semantic anomalies. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Caplan, D., Sitnikova, T., Eddy, M., & Holcomb, P. (2006). Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic and thematic relationships in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 489–530. doi: 10.1080/01690960500094279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Kreher, D. A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 100(3), 223–237. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117–129. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00086-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-29.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livitz, I., Wood, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). The role of animacy information in syntactic processing: A case study of middle constructions. Paper presented at 22nd CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, UC Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(1), 213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maekawa, K., Yamazaki, M., Ogiso, T., Maruyama, T., Ogura, H., Kashino, W., … Den, T. (2014). Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48(2), 345–371. doi: 10.1007/s10579-013-9261-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Loches, M., Muñoz, F., Casado, P., Melcón, A., & Fernández-Frías, C. (2005). Are the anterior negativities to grammatical violations indexing working memory? Psychophysiology, 42(5), 508–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00308.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momma, S. (2016). Parsing, generation and grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language, 106(2), 119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTT Communication Science Laboratories. (1999). Nihongo-no goitokusei [Lexical properties of Japanese]. In Amano, S., and Kondo, K. Sanseido, Tokyo: Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Oishi, H., & Sakamoto, T. (2009). Immediate interaction between syntactic and semantic outputs: evidence from event-related potentials in Japanese sentence processing. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language, 59, 494–522. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 786–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Pace yourself: Intraindividual variability in context used revealed by self-paced event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(5), 837–854. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Lee, C-L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 52(11), 1456–1469. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiplelinear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. doi: 10.3102/10769986031004437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R CoreTeam. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2014). The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revised: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned. Brain and Language, 137, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stites, M. C., Payne, B. R., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates N400 during sentence reading. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 475–490. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0492-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, C., & Phillips, C. (2012). Examining the evidence for an independent semantic analyzer: An ERP study in Spanish. Brain and Language, 120, 108–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN) in electrophysiological studies of morphosyntactic agreement: A commentary on “Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions” by Molinaro et al., 2014. Cortex, 66, 149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 277–293. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367–382. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56(4), 289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. (2009). On the processing of Japanese wh-questions: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1290(22), 63–90. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 241–255. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, M. (2017). Predictive processing of aspectual information: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1416150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, M., & Sakamoto, T. (2016). The interaction of morphosyntactic and semantic processing in Japanese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Gengo Kenkyu, 149, 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yano, M., Tateyama, T., & Sakamoto, T. (2014). Processing of Japanese cleft constructions in context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 277–286.
   Google Scholar