Using the visual-world paradigm to explore the meaning of conditionals in natural language

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: papers3://publication/doi/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 502–518. doi: papers3://publication/doi/10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., Douven, I., Evans, J. S. B. T., Oaksford, M., Over, D., & Politzer, G. (2015). The new paradigm and mental models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 547–548. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrouillet, P., Gauffroy, C., & Lecas, J.-F. (2008). Mental models and the suppositional account of conditionals. Psychological Review, 115(3), 760–771. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrouillet, P., & Lecas, J.-F. (1998). How can mental models theory account for content effects in conditional reasoning? A developmental perspective. Cognition, 67, 209–253. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00037-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. Retrieved from arXiv:1506.04967 (stat.ME).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84–107. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005a). Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(2), 123–150. doi: 10.1080/13546780442000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005b). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 349–381. doi: 10.1080/13546780442000222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudman, V. H. (1994). On conditionals. Journal of Philosophy, 91(3), 113–128. doi: 10.2307/2940989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2011). Subtracting “ought” from “is”: descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(05), 233–248. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1100001X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 978–996. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.978 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 378–395. doi: 10.3758/BF03193858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Thinking twice: Two minds in one brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. E. (2007). Thinking about conditionals: A study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1772–1784. doi: 10.3758/BF03193509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. E. (2008). Understanding causal conditionals: A study of individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1291–1297. doi: 10.1080/17470210802027961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Neilens, H., Handley, S. J., & Over, D. E. (2008). When can we say “if”? Cognition, 108, 100–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If: Supposition, pragmatics, and dual processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Over, D. E., & Handley, S. J. (2005). Suppositions, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002). Psychological Review, 112(4), 1040–1052. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauffroy, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2009). Heuristic and analytic processes in mental models for conditionals: An integrative developmental theory. Developmental Review, 29, 249–282. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauffroy, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2011). The primacy of thinking about possibilities in the development of reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1000–1011. doi: 10.1037/a0023269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–96. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhle, B., Berger, F., Müller, A., Schmitz, M., & Weissenborn, J. (2009). Focus particles in children’s language: Production and comprehension of auch “also” in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of Age. Language Acquisition, 16(1), 36–66. doi: 10.1080/10489220802584550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71–115. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Mental models and thought. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 185–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(43), 18243–18250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012933107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646–678. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.646 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Khemlani, S. S. (2013). Toward a unified theory of reasoning. In H. R. Brian (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 1–42). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., Khemlani, S. S., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(4), 201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Famar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23(1), 1–53. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffh033
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. (2015). Conditional reasoning: The unruly syntactics, semantics, thematics, and pragmatics of “if”. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Hall, S. (2016). On the source of human irrationality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado, J., & Noveck, I. A. (2006). How reaction time measures elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed. Thinking & Reasoning, 12(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1080/13546780500371241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. (1929). Law and causality. In D. H. Mellor (Ed.), Foundations: Essays in philosophy, logic, mathematics and economics (1978) (pp. 129–151). London: Routledge & Henley.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Teem. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1903/2010). The principle of mathematics. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1906). The theory of implication. American Journal of Mathematics, 28(2), 159–202. doi: 10.2307/2369962
   Google Scholar
• Salverda, A. P., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W. J. (2010a). A meta-analytic review of thinking about what is true, possible, and irrelevant in reasoning from or reasoning about conditional propositions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 897–921. doi: 10.1080/09541440902928915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W. J. (2010b). Mistaking the instance for the rule: A critical analysis of the truth-table evaluation paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 246–259. doi: 10.1080/17470210902888726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W. J., & Braem, S. (2010). The initial representation in reasoning towards an interpretation of conditional sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 339–362. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.513734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W. J., Schaeken, W., & Dieussaert, K. (2008). “The” interpretation(s) of conditionals. Experimental Psychology, 55(2), 113–120. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.xxx doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.2.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenants, A., Schroyens, W. J., Dieussaert, K., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2008). Truth table tasks: The relevance of irrelevant. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(4), 409–433. doi: 10.1080/13546780802388125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SR Research Ltd. (2012). Eyelink II technical specifications. Mississauga. Retrieved from http://www.sr-research.com/pdf/elII_table.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, L. (2018). Scalar and ignorance inferences are both computed immediately upon encountering the sentential connective: The online processing of sentences with disjunction using the visual world paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, L., Crain, S., & Zhou, P. (2015). The online processing of only if and even if conditional statements: Implications for mental models. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(7), 367–379. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1016527
   Google Scholar