Meaning-based attentional guidance as a function of foveal and task-related cognitive loads

References

• Barber, H. A., Doñamayor, N., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. (2010). Parafoveal N400 effect during sentence reading. Neuroscience Letters, 479(2), 152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H. A., Van der Meij, M., & Kutas, M. (2013). An electrophysiological analysis of contextual and temporal constraints on parafoveal word processing. Psychophysiology, 50(1), 48–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01489.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. T. (2010). Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss. Optometry and Vision Science: Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 87(4), 276–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. T., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (1998). Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38(19), 2949–2962. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00072-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dampuré, J., Benraiss, A., & Vibert, N. (2016). Task-dependent modulation of word processing mechanisms during modified visual search tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1145–1163. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1070886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dampuré, J., Ros, C., Rouet, J.-F., & Vibert, N. (2014). Task-dependent sensitisation of perceptual and semantic processing during visual search for words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 530–549. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.907576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deco, G., & Zihl, J. (2006). The neurodynamics of visual search. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 1006–1024. doi: 10.1080/13506280500195425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Kliegl, R., & Sommer, W. (2012). Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials. Neuroimage, 62(1), 381–393. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11(6), 467–473. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Espal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1246–1258. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Eye guidance and visual search. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 251–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 166–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1150–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 128–149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh-Yee, I. (2001). Research on Web search behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 23(2), 167–185. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(01)00069-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: Consonance-driven orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 148–153. doi: 10.3758/BF03194042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., & Hochstein, S. (2009). Comparing eye movements to detected vs undetected target stimuli in an identity search task. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 20. doi: 10.1167/9.5.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., & De Fockert, J. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 669–674. doi: 10.3758/BF03196756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W., Legge, G. E., & Ortiz, A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? Vision Research, 43(26), 2837–2846. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00479-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., & Vibert, N. (2012). Orthographic versus semantic matching in visual search for words within lists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 32–43. doi: 10.1037/a0026111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Niefind, F., Wang, S., Sommer, W., & Dimigen, O. (2015). Parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 52(10), 1361–1374. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pérez, P. J., Dampuré, J., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., & Barber, H. A. (2016). Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from fixation related potentials. Brain and Language, 162, 29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Telling, A. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Early activation of object names in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 710–716. doi: 10.3758/BF03196826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, E., Laiti, L., & Chelazzi, L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 182–189. doi: 10.1038/nn996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N, Meijer, F, & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Stites, M. C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2016). Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1839–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petre, K. L., Hazel, C. A., Fine, E. M., & Rubin, G. S. (2000). Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optometry and Vision Science, 77(1), 34–39. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200001000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., & Drieghe, D. (2014). Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1067–1072. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0582-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114. doi: 10.2307/3002019
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J., MacNamara, A., Proudfit, G. H., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2014). More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: Evidence from contralateral delay activity. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 8–8. doi: 10.1167/14.3.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 619–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroyens, W., Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(4), 1021–1046. doi: 10.1080/713755859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top–down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 730–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(5), 924–934. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.5.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stites, M. C., Payne, B. R., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Getting ahead of yourself: Parafoveal word expectancy modulates the N400 during sentence reading. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 475–490. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0492-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telling, A. L., Kumar, S., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 2212–2225. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2015). Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers’ lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J. (1988). Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 171–191. doi: 10.2307/1422833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 561–566. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1069–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. L., He, S., & Cavanagh, P. (2012). Semantic priming from crowded words. Psychological Science, 23(6), 608–616. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787–835. doi: 10.1037/a0013118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Li, N., Wang, X., & Wang, S. (2015). Integration of sentence-level semantic information in parafovea: Evidence from the RSVP-flanker paradigm. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0139016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar