Predictive entrainment of natural speech through two fronto-motor top-down channels

References

• Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2016). A multimodal spectral approach to characterize rhythm in natural speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(1), 215–226. doi: 10.1121/1.4939496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A. L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, L., Barrett, A. B., & Seth, A. K. (2009). Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. Physical Review Letters, 103(23), 238701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.238701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron, 76(4), 695–711. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl, P. J., & McKay, N. D. (1992). A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, 14, 239–256. doi: 10.1109/34.121791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, C., Trubanova, A., Stillittano, S., Caplier, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). The natural statistics of audiovisual speech. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(7), e1000436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., & Nobre, A. C. (2013). Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(9), 4002–4010. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4675-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164. doi: 10.1038/nn.4186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Patel, A. D., Chen, L., Butler, H., Luo, C., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Temporal modulations in speech and music. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt B), 181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florin, E., Gross, J., Pfeifer, J., Fink, G. R., & Timmermann, L. (2010). The effect of filtering on granger causality based multivariate causality measures. Neuroimage, 50(2), 577–588. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontolan, L., Morillon, B., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., & Giraud, A. L. (2014). The contribution of frequency-specific activity to hierarchical information processing in the human auditory cortex. Nature Communications, 5(4694), doi: 10.1038/ncomms5694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2015). Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex, 68, 129–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2011). Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. L., Ince, R. A. A., Gross, J., Schyns, P. G., Panzeri, S., & Kayser, C. (2017). Contributions of local speech encoding and functional connectivity to audio-visual speech perception. Elife, 6, doi: 10.7554/eLife.24763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A. L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517. doi: 10.1038/nn.3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Baillet, S., Barnes, G. R., Henson, R. N., Hillebrand, A., Jensen, O., … Schoffelen, J. M. (2013). Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage, 65, 349–363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biology, 11(12), e1001752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, U. (2017). The neurobiology of uncertainty: Implications for statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1711), doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., & Kawanami, H. (2002). Temporal rate change of dialogue speech in prosodic units as compared to read speech. Speech Communication, 36(1-2), 97–111. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, R. A., Mazzoni, A., Bartels, A., Logothetis, N. K., & Panzeri, S. (2012). A novel test to determine the significance of neural selectivity to single and multiple potentially correlated stimulus features. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 210(1), 49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, R. A., Schultz, S. R., & Panzeri, S. (2014). Estimating information-theoretic quantities. In D. Jaeger & R. Jung (Eds.), Encyclopedia of computational neuroscience.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science, 320(5872), 110–113. doi: 10.1126/science.1154735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. discussion 38–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication – origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, J. (1990). Causality, feedback and directed information. Proceedings International Symposium Information Theory Application (ISITA 1990), pp. 303–305.
   Google Scholar
• Morillon, B., & Baillet, S. (2017). Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(42), E8913–E8921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705373114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narain, C., Scott, S. K., Wise, R. J., Rosen, S., Leff, A., Iversen, S. D., & Matthews, P. M. (2003). Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 13(12), 1362–1368. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, G. (2003). The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 48(22), 3637–3652. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2016). Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 4–18. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1081703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzeri, S., Senatore, R., Montemurro, M. A., & Petersen, R. S. (2007). Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1064–1072. doi: 10.1152/jn.00559.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Ince, R. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2015). Frontal top-down signals increase coupling of auditory low-frequency oscillations to continuous speech in human listeners. Current Biology, 25(12), 1649–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Kayser, C., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2016). Lip movements entrain the observers’ low-frequency brain oscillations to facilitate speech intelligibility. Elife, 5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pefkou, M., Arnal, L. H., Fontolan, L., & Giraud, A. L. (2017). θ-Band and β-band neural activity reflects independent syllable tracking and comprehension of time-compressed speech. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(33), 7930–7938. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2882-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernet, C. R., Wilcox, R., & Rousselet, G. A. (2013). Robust correlation analyses: False positive and power validation using a new open source matlab toolbox. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D. (2003). The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as ‘asymmetric sampling in time’. Speech Communication, 41, 245–255. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohenkohl, G., & Nobre, A. C. (2011). Alpha oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(40), 14076–14084. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3387-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruspantini, I., Saarinen, T., Belardinelli, P., Jalava, A., Parviainen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2012). Corticomuscular coherence is tuned to the spontaneous rhythmicity of speech at 2–3 Hz. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 3786–3790. doi: 10.1523/Jneurosci.3191-11.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, T. (2000). Measuring information transfer. Physical Review Letters, 85(2), 461–464. doi:10.1103/PhysRev Lett.85.461 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416(6876), 87–90. doi: 10.1038/416087a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tree, J. E. F. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tree, J. E. F. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 320–326. doi: 10.3758/BF03194926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., … Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, I., Florin, E., von Papen, M., & Timmermann, L. (2017). The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy. PLoS One, 12(11), e0188210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wostmann, M., Herrmann, B., Wilsch, A., & Obleser, J. (2015). Neural alpha dynamics in younger and older listeners reflect acoustic challenges and predictive benefits. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(4), 1458–1467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3250-14.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion Golumbic, E., Cogan, G. B., Schroeder, C. E., & Poeppel, D. (2013). Visual input enhances selective speech envelope tracking in auditory cortex at a “cocktail party”. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(4), 1417–1426. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3675-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar