Cortical entrainment: what we can learn from studying naturalistic speech perception

References

• Ahissar, E., Nagarajan, S., Ahissar, M., Protopapas, A., Mahncke, H., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001). Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(23), 13367–13372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2016). A multimodal spectral approach to characterize rhythm in natural speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(1), 215–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2018). Cortical tracking of global and local variations of speech rhythm during connected natural speech perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrou, A. M., Saarinen, T., Mäkelä, S., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2017). The right hemisphere is highlighted in connected natural speech production and perception. NeuroImage, 152(C), 628–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaneo, M. F., Sitt, J., Varoquaux, G., Sigman, M., Cohen, L., & Trevisan, M. A. (2016). Exploring the anatomical encoding of voice with a mathematical model of the vocal system. NeuroImage, 141, 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016). A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaauw, E. (1994). The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, 14(4), 359–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, A. F. T., Giraud, A.-L., Mansvelder, H. D., & Linkenkaer-Hansen, K. (2018). Scale-free amplitude modulation of neuronal oscillations tracks comprehension of accelerated speech. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(3), 710–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, M., De Tiege, X., de Beeck, M. O., Ligot, N., Paquier, P., Van Bogaert, P., … Jousmäki, V. (2013). The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice. Human Brain Mapping, 34(2), 314–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 274–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderone, D. J., Lakatos, P., Butler, P. D., & Castellanos, F. X. (2014). Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., … Knight, R. T. (2006). High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science, 313(5793), 1626–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, C., Trubanova, A., Stillittano, S., Caplier, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). The natural statistics of audiovisual speech. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(7), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, P., & Krauss, R. M. (1994). Gesture and speech in spontaneous and rehearsed narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(6), 580–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37(3), 201–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., Barker, J., Cunningham, S., & Shao, X. (2006). An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2421–2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1982). Segmental durations in connected speech signals: Preliminary results. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(3), 705–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2012a). Looking for rhythm in speech. Empirical Musicology Review, 7(1-2), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2012b). Oscillators and syllables: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F., & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debener, S., Herrmann, C. S., Kranczioch, C., Gembris, D., & Engel, A. K. (2003). Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity. Neuroreport, 14(5), 683–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Liberto, G. M., O’Sullivan, J. A., & Lalor, E. C. (2015). Low-frequency cortical entrainment to speech reflects phoneme-level processing. Current Biology, 25(19), 2457–2465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., & Pitt, M. A. (2010). Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1664–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Chatterjee, M., & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Robust cortical entrainment to the speech envelope relies on the spectro-temporal fine structure. NeuroImage, 88, 41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Patel, A. D., Chen, L., Butler, H., Luo, C., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Temporal modulations in speech and music. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(B), 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012). Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(1), 78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: Functional roles and interpretations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 311–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelling, K. B., Arnal, L. H., Ghitza, O., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Acoustic landmarks drive delta–theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. NeuroImage, 85, 761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 704–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(2), 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, M., & Rogina, I. (1997). Wide context acoustic modeling in read vs. spontaneous speech 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 3, pp. 1743-1746). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazanfar, A. A., Morrill, R. J., & Kayser, C. (2013). Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like speech rhythm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(5), 1959–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2011). Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2012). On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsing in decoding speech: Intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2013). The theta-syllable: A unit of speech information defined by cortical function. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O., & Greenberg, S. (2009). On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: Intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica, 66(1-2), 113–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. L., Ince, R. A. A., Gross, J., Schyns, P. G., Panzeri, S., & Kayser, C. (2017). Contributions of local speech encoding and functional connectivity to audio-visual speech perception. eLife, 6, e24763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A.-L., Kleinschmidt, A., Poeppel, D., Lund, T. E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Laufs, H. (2007). Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron, 56(6), 1127–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Leong, V. (2013). Speech rhythm and temporal structure: Converging perspectives? Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biology, 11(12), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegens, S., & Zion Golumbic, E. (2018). Rhythmic facilitation of sensory processing: A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 86, 150–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(49), 20095–20100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., & Ackermann, H. (2013). Tracking the speech signal – time-locked MEG signals during perception of ultra-fast and moderately fast speech in blind and in sighted listeners. Brain and Language, 124(1), 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., Trouvain, J., Moos, A., & Ackermann, H. (2012). Magnetic brain activity phase-locked to the envelope, the syllable onsets, and the fundamental frequency of a perceived speech signal. Psychophysiology, 49(3), 322–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., Farahbod, H., & Saberi, K. (2015). The rhythm of perception: Entrainment to acoustic rhythms induces subsequent perceptual oscillation. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1006–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., & Kawanami, H. (2002). Temporal rate change of dialogue speech in prosodic units as compared to read speech. Speech Communication, 36(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. F., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(5), 2500–2511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J. R., Repp, B. H., & Patel, A. D. (2009). Top-down control of rhythm perception modulates early auditory responses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 58–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen, O., Kaiser, J., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2007). Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(7), 317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, S. J., Ince, R. A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2015). Irregular speech rate dissociates auditory cortical entrainment, evoked responses, and frontal alpha. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(44), 14691–14701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, A., & Gross, J. (2016). Individual human brain areas can be identified from their characteristic spectral activation fingerprints. PLoS Biology, 14(6), e1002498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, A., Ince, R. A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2017). Auditory cortical delta-entrainment interacts with oscillatory power in multiple fronto-parietal networks. NeuroImage, 147, 32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösem, A., Basirat, A., Azizi, L., & Wassenhove, V. v. (2016). High-frequency neural activity predicts word parsing in ambiguous speech streams. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(6), 2497–2512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8(4), 194–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science, 320(5872), 110–113. doi: 10.1126/science.1154735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Shah, A. S., Knuth, K. H., Ulbert, I., Karmos, G., & Schroeder, C. E. (2005). An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(3), 1904–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Boemio, A., Gordon, M., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The perception of FM sweeps by Chinese and English listeners. Hearing Research, 224(1-2), 75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Liu, Z., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biology, 8(8), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron, 54(6), 1001–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, G., Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2016). Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing. NeuroImage, 133, 516–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295(5555), 690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, J. P., Ahonen, A., Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Llmoniemi, R., Kajola, M., … Salmelin, R. (1993). Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole-head neuromagnetic recordings. Human Brain Mapping, 1(1), 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, K. E., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., & Ro, T. (2009). To see or not to see: Prestimulus α phase predicts visual awareness. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(9), 2725–2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. (2017). The neural oscillations of speech processing and language comprehension: State of the art and emerging mechanisms. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1–13. doi:10.1111/ejn.13748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Henry, M. J., Gaston, P., Schmuck, N., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4293–4302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Sun, Y., & Martin, A. E. (2018). Entrainment in disguise: The exogenous and endogenous cortical rhythms of speech and language processing. PsyArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., Grosjean, F., & Lomanto, C. (1984). Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: A reanalysis and some implications. Phonetica, 41(4), 215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millman, R. E., Johnson, S. R., & Prendergast, G. (2015). The role of phase-locking to the temporal envelope of speech in auditory perception and speech intelligibility. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(3), 533–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morillon, B., & Schroeder, C. E. (2015). Neuronal oscillations as a mechanistic substrate of auditory temporal prediction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima, S. y., & Allen, J. F. (1993). A study on prosody and discourse structure in cooperative dialogues. Phonetica, 50(3), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuling, T., Rach, S., Wagner, S., Wolters, C. H., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012). Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception. NeuroImage, 63(2), 771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, F., & Jeon, H.-S. (2014). Speech rhythm: A metaphor? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourski, K. V., Reale, R. A., Oya, H., Kawasaki, H., Kovach, C. K., Chen, H., … Brugge, J. F. (2009). Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(49), 15564–15574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Ince, R. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2015). Frontal top-down signals increase coupling of auditory low-frequency oscillations to continuous speech in human listeners. Current Biology, 25(12), 1649–1653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payton, K. L., Uchanski, R. M., & Braida, L. D. (1994). Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3), 1581–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E. (2018). Speech comprehension: Stimulating discussions at a cocktail party. Current Biology, 28(2), R68–R70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Gross, J., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 23(6), 1378–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28(1), 96–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puschmann, S., Steinkamp, S., Gillich, I., Mirkovic, B., Debener, S., & Thiel, C. M. (2017). The right temporoparietal junction supports speech tracking during selective listening: Evidence from concurrent EEG-fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(47), 11505–11516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruspantini, I., Saarinen, T., Belardinelli, P., Jalava, A., Parviainen, T., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2012). Corticomuscular coherence is tuned to the spontaneous rhythmicity of speech at 2–3 Hz. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 3786–3790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., Wilson, D. A., Radman, T., Scharfman, H., & Lakatos, P. (2010). Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Lang, H., & Wise, R. J. S. (2006). Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech—A positron emission tomography study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(2), 1075–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416(6876), 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinschneider, M., Nourski, K. V., & Fishman, Y. I. (2013). Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: Is it special. Hearing Research, 305, 57–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swerts, M., Strangert, E., & Heldner, M. (1996). F0 declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech. In H. T. Bunnel & W. Idsardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on spoken language processing (Vol. 3, pp. 1501–1504). Philadelphia, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Telkemeyer, S., Rossi, S., Koch, S. P., Nierhaus, T., Steinbrink, J., Poeppel, D., … Wartenburger, I. (2009). Sensitivity of newborn auditory cortex to the temporal structure of sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(47), 14726–14733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S., & Arvaniti, A. (2013). Speech rhythm analysis with decomposition of the amplitude envelope: Characterizing rhythmic patterns within and across languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), 628–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tree, J. E. F. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tree, J. E. F. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchanski, R. M., Choi, S. S., Braida, L. D., Reed, C. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1996). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(3), 494–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.-J. (2010). Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiological Reviews, 90(3), 1195–1268. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaruss, J. S. (1999). Utterance length, syntactic complexity, and childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 329–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Melloni, L., Poeppel, D., & Ding, N. (2016). Interpretations of frequency domain analyses of neural entrainment: Periodicity, fundamental frequency, and harmonics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion-Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., … Simon, J. Z. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron, 77(5), 980–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., Archer-Boyd, A., & Davis, M. H. (2018). Phase entrainment of brain oscillations causally modulates neural responses to intelligible speech. Current Biology, 28(3), 401–408. e405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., ten Oever, S., & Sack, A. T. (2018). The involvement of endogenous neural oscillations in the processing of rhythmic input: More than a regular repetition of evoked neural responses. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., & VanRullen, R. (2015). The role of high-level processes for oscillatory phase entrainment to speech sound. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar