448
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Backward-looking sentence processing in typically disfluent versus stuttered speech: ERP evidence

&
Pages 561-579 | Received 15 Apr 2018, Accepted 28 Sep 2018, Published online: 09 Oct 2018

References

  • Bailey, K. G., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 183–200. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00027-5
  • Beilby, J. M., Byrnes, M. L., Meagher, E. L., & Yaruss, J. S. (2013). The impact of stuttering on adults who stutter and their partners. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.12.001
  • Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7(6), 1129–1159. doi: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129
  • Blomgren, M. (2010). Stuttering treatment for adults: An update on contemporary approaches. Seminars in Speech and Language, 31(4), 272–282. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265760
  • Brown, S. F. (1945). The loci of stutterings in the speech sequence. Journal of Speech Disorders, 10(3), 181–192. doi: 10.1044/jshd.1003.181
  • Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
  • Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension?: ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128–145. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.008
  • Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y. (2009). The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34(2), 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002
  • Cyprus, S., Hezel, R. T., Rossi, D., & Adams, M. R. (1984). Effects of simulated stuttering on listener recall. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 9(3), 191–197. doi: 10.1016/0094-730X(84)90012-3
  • Dien, J. (2010). The ERP PCA toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1), 138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009
  • Dien, J., & Frishkoff, G. A. (2005). Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. In T. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 189–208). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00158
  • Friederici, A. D. (1998). Diagnosis and reanalysis: Two processing aspects the brain may differentiate. In J. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 177–200). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1219.
  • Frisch, S., Schlesewsky, M., Saddy, D., & Alpermann, A. (2002). The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition, 85(3), B83–B92. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00126-9
  • Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), 8051–8056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110
  • Glass, K. A., Frishkoff, G. A., Frank, R. M., Davey, C., Dien, J., Malony, A. D., & Tucker, D. M. (2004). A framework for evaluating ICA methods of artifact removal from multichannel EEG. In International conference on independent component analysis and signal separation (pp. 1033–1040). Berlin: Springer.
  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823
  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. doi: 10.1162/089892999563328
  • Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251–266.
  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141.
  • Hannah, E. P., & Gardner, J. G. (1968). A note on syntactic relationships in nonfluency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 11(4), 853–860. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1104.853
  • Hanulíková, A., Van Alphen, P. M., Van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 878–887. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00103
  • Healey, E. C. (2010). What the literature tells us about listeners’ reactions to stuttering: Implications for the clinical management of stuttering. Seminars in Speech and Language, 31(4), 227–235. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265756
  • Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17(1), 65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x
  • Holcomb, P. J., Coffey, S. A., & Neville, H. J. (1992). Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event-related brain potentials. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8(2-3), 203–241. doi: 10.1080/87565649209540525
  • Howell, P., Au-Yeung, J., & Sackin, S. (1999). Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 345–354. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4202.345
  • Hulit, L. M. (1976). Effects of nonfluencies on comprehension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42(3_suppl), 1119–1122. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.3c.1119
  • Iverach, L., O’Brian, S., Jones, M., Block, S., Lincoln, M., Harrison, E., … Onslow, M. (2009). Prevalence of anxiety disorders among adults seeking speech therapy for stuttering. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(7), 928–934. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.06.003
  • Jayaram, M. (1984). Distribution of stuttering in sentences: Relationship to sentence length and clause position. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27(3), 338–341. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2703.338
  • Kaasin, K., & Bjerkan, B. (1982). Critical words and the locus of stuttering in speech. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 7(4), 433–446. doi: 10.1016/0094-730X(82)90019-5
  • Klem, G. H., Lüders, H. O., Jasper, H. H., & Elger, C. (1999). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 52(3), 3–6.
  • Kolk, H. H., Chwilla, D. J., Van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5
  • Koopmans, M., Slis, I., & Rietveld, T. (1991). The influence of word position and word type on the incidence of stuttering. In H. F. M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C. W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering (pp. 333–340). New York: Elsevier.
  • Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  • Kutas, M., & King, J. W. (1996). The potentials for basic sentence processing: Differentiating integrative processes. In I. Ikeda & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 501–546). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Lanyon, R. I. (1969). Behavior change in stuttering through systematic desensitization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 34(3), 253–260. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3403.253
  • Logan, K. J. (2003). The effect of syntactic structure upon speech initiation times of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28(1), 17–35. doi: 10.1016/S0094-730X(03)00003-2
  • Lowder, M., Maxfield, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (submitted). Processing of self-repairs in stuttered and non-stuttered speech.
  • Manning, W. H., Burlison, A. E., & Thaxton, D. (1999). Listener response to stuttering modification techniques. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 24(4), 267–280. doi: 10.1016/S0094-730X(99)00022-4
  • Maxfield, N. D., Lyon, J. M., & Silliman, E. R. (2009). Disfluencies along the garden path: Brain electrophysiological evidence of disrupted sentence processing. Brain and Language, 111(2), 86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.003
  • Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), 151–165. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151
  • Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
  • Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 786.
  • Panico, J., & Healey, E. C. (2009). Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 534–546. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0238)
  • Panico, J., Healey, E. C., Brouwer, K., & Susca, M. (2005). Listener perceptions of stuttering across two presentation modes: A quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30(1), 65–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.01.003
  • Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., … Taylor, M. J. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 127–152. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720127
  • Posner, M. I., & Pavese, A. (1998). Anatomy of word and sentence meaning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 899–905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.899
  • Preisendorfer, R. W., & Mobley, C. D. (1988). Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography (Vol. 17). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Prins, D., & Ingham, R. J. (2009). Evidence-based treatment and stuttering—Historical perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 254–263. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0111)
  • Quarrington, B. (1956). Cyclical variation in stuttering frequency and some related forms of variation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 179–184. doi: 10.1037/h0083681
  • Ratner, N. B., & Benitez, M. (1985). Linguistic analysis of a bilingual stutterer. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10(3), 211–219. doi: 10.1016/0094-730X(85)90011-7
  • Richman, M. B. (1986). Rotation of principal components. Journal of Climatology, 6(3), 293–335. doi: 10.1002/joc.3370060305
  • Sander, E. K. (1965). Comments on investigating listener reaction to speech disfluency. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 30, 159–165. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3002.159
  • Silverman, S. W., & Ratner, N. B. (1997). Syntactic complexity, fluency, and accuracy of sentence imitation in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(1), 95–106. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4001.95
  • Soderberg, G. A. (1971). Relations of word information and word length to stuttering disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 4(1), 9–14. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(71)90057-8
  • Susca, M., & Healey, E. C. (2001). Perceptions of simulated stuttering and fluency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(1), 61–72. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/006)
  • Susca, M., & Healey, E. C. (2002). Listener perceptions along a fluency–disfluency continuum: A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27(2), 135–161. doi: 10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00126-2
  • Tataryn, D. J., Wood, J. M., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1999). Setting the value of k in promax: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(3), 384–391. doi: 10.1177/00131649921969938
  • Tornick, G. B., & Bloodstein, O. (1976). Stuttering and sentence length. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 19(4), 651–654. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1904.651
  • Tsiamtsiouris, J., & Cairns, H. S. (2013). Effects of sentence-structure complexity on speech initiation time and disfluency. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38(1), 30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.12.002
  • Wells, G. B. (1979). Effect of sentence structure on stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 4(2), 123–129. doi: 10.1016/0094-730X(79)90011-1
  • Wingate, M. E. (1964). A standard definition of stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29(4), 484–489. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2904.484
  • Yaruss, J. S. (2010). Assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35(3), 190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.010

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.