Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia

References

• Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Quin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of syntactic priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2016). What children learn from adults’ utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult–child dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Cleland, A. A. (2007). Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Cognition, 104(2), 163–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 373–443). New York , NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G., DeDe, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language, 101(2), 103–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A, & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(5), 259–278.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2010). What goes wrong during passive sentence production in agrammatic aphasia: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 24(12), 1576–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., Mack, J. E., & Thompson, C. K. (2016). Grammatical encoding and learning in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 202–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G., Ricca, M., Knilans, J., & Trubl, B. (2014). Construct validity and reliability of working memory tasks for people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(6), 692–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., Kleinman, D., Kraljic, T., & Siu, Y. (2012). Do priming effects in dialogue reflect partner- or task-based expectations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, A. B., & Florian Jaeger, T. (2013). Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 578–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. A. (2000). Moving verbs in agrammatic production. In R Bastiaanse & Y Grodzinsky (Eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective (pp. 152–170). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. A., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Clark, A. (1993). The development of dialogue co-ordination skills in schoolchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 101–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53(3), 181–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruberg, N., Ostrand, R. O., Momma, S., & Ferreira, V. S. (under review). Syntactic entrainment: Repetition of syntactic structure in event descriptions. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Gruberg, N., Wardlow, L., & Ferreira, V. S. (2014). Young children represent syntax abstractly, but prefer to use it concretely. Poster presented at AMLaP XX, Edinburgh, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Guendouzi, J., Loncke, F., & Williams, M. J. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: Perspectives in communication disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. (1991). Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasics: Evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5(3), 247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S. M., Messenger, K., & Maylor, E. A. (2017). Aging and syntactic representations: Evidence of preserved syntactic priming and lexical boost. Psychology and Aging, 32(6), 588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargiwara, H. (1995). The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language, 50, 92–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 214–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. (1998). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 62, 221–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2001). Cognitive linguistic Quick Test: Examiner’s Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Greiner, L. H., Marquis, J. G., Prenovost, K., & Mitzner, T. L. (2001a). Language decline across the life span: Findings from the nun study. Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., & Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 312–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Thompson, M., & Marquis, J. (2001b). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and semantic content.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western aphasia battery–revised (WAB-R) pro-ed. Austin, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels, R. P., Van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & De Haan, E. H. (2000). The Corsi block-tapping task: Standardization and normative data. Applied Neuropsychology, 7(4), 252–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2000). Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74(1), 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. (1995). A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language, 50(3), 282–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1992). Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7(2), 89–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Man, G. (2017). Language recovery in aphasia following implicit syntactic priming training: A case study. Aphasiology, 31(12), 1441–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2011a). Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 985–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2011b). Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 813–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Yoshida, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). Grammatical planning units during real-time sentence production in speakers with agrammatic aphasia and healthy speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1182–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C, Schwartz, M. F, Romania, J. R, Kohn, S. E, & Stephens, D. L. (2000). Grammatical encoding in aphasia: Evidence from a “processing prosthesis”. Brain and Language, 75(3), 416–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13(3), 361–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, M, Chang, F, Pine, J. M, Blything, R, & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Syntactic priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitter, D., & Moore, J. D. (2014). Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2015). Modulating the sensitivity to syntactic factors in production: Evidence from syntactic priming in agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 639–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from syntactic priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125(1), 49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1997). Effects of structural priming on sentence production in aphasics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 877–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Marin, O. S. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: II. Production. Brain and Language, 10(2), 263–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., Raffray, C. N., & Myachykov, A. (2017). The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 102–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard, J., Nerantzini, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2017). Implicit learning and implicit treatment outcomes in individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(1), 25–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F, Saffran, E. M, Fink, R. B, Myers, J. L, & Martin, N. (1994). Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology, 8(1), 19–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10(2), 249–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 371–377.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2011). Northwestern assessment of verbs and sentences. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Lee, J. (2015). Models of sentence production. In A. E. Hillis (Ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders (pp. 328–354). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verreyt, N., Bogaerts, L., Cop, U., Bernolet, S., De Letter, M., Hemelsoet, D., … Duyck, W. (2013). Syntactic priming in bilingual patients with parallel and differential aphasia. Aphasiology, 27(7), 867–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warker, J. A., Dell, G. S., Whalen, C. A., & Gereg, S. (2008). Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1289–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Clark, H. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H, Martin, R. C, & Slevc, L. R. (2018). Lexical overlap increases syntactic priming in aphasia independently of short-term memory abilities: Evidence against the explicit memory account of the lexical boost. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 48, 76–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar