The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: language-general vs. language-specific aspects

References

• Arsenijevič, B. (2005). VP semantics as a temporal structure. In M. Salzmann, & L. Vicente (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Syntax AiO Meeting (pp. 17–42). Leiden Papers in Linguistics, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, Μ, & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M., de León, L., & Choi, S. (1995). Verbs, particles, and spatial semantics: Learning to talk about spatial actions in typologically different languages. Proceedings from the 27th Annual Child Language Research Forum, USA, 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bunger, A., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2012). The relation between event apprehension and utterance formation in children: Evidence from linguistic omissions. Cognition, 122, 135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of langauge-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filip, H. (2003). Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 11, 55–101.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. R. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 92, 333–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, B. (2005). The prepositional aspect of Slavic prefixes and the goal-source asymmetry. In Online Proceedings from ESSLI Workshop “Formal Semantics and Cross-Linguistic Data’, Radboud Universit, Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Gennari, S., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickmann, M. (2003). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihara, H., & Fujita, I. (2000). A cognitive approach to errors in case marking in Japanese agrammatism: The priority of the goal –ni over the source –kara. In A. Foolen, & F. Van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics: Selected Papers from the 5th International cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 123–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, M., & Papafragou, A. (2014). What does children’s spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–30. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. R., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 529–545. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000252X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & Carey, S. (2015). Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development, 11(2), 152–175. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2014.896168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & DiFabrizio, S. (2017). And, the winner is … A visual preference for end points over starting points in infants’ motion event representations. Infancy, 22, 323–343. doi: 10.1111/infa.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96, 1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & Landau, L. (2012). Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between goal and source paths. Cognitive Science, 36, 517–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Muentener, P., Petrillo, L., Mullanaphy, N., & Muniz, L. (2017). Does making something move matter? Representations of goals and sources in causal motion events. Cognitive Science, 41, 814–826. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Spinelli, D., & Garcia, K. (2017). The relationship between pre-verbal event representations and semantic structures: The case of goal and source paths. Cognition, 164, 174–187. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K., & Landau, B. (2007). Conceptual foundations of spatial language: Evidence for a goal bias in infants. Language Learning and Development, 3(3), 179–197. doi: 10.1080/15475440701360168
   Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Yoshida, H., Landau, B., & Smith, L. (2006). Cross-linguistic evidence for a Goal ⁄ Source asymmetry: The case of Japanese. Poster presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 217–238. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00029733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, B., Johannes, K., Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A. (2017). Containment and support: Core and complexity in spatial language learning. Cognitive Science, 41, 748–779. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Zukowski, A. (2003). Objects, motions, and paths: Spatial language in children with Williams Syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1&2), 105–137. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN231&2_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1997). From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In E. Pederson, & J. Nuyts (Eds.), With language in mind: The relationship between linguistic and conceptual representation (pp. 13–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Imai, M., Haryu, E., Vanegas, S., … Davis, B. S. (2010). A developmental shift from similar to language-specific strategies in verb acquisition: A comparison of English, Spanish and Japanese. Cognition, 114(3), 299–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02074.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99(4), 587–604. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovskaya, E. (2006). Goal-source asymmetry and Russian spatial prefixes. In Nordlyd: Tromso working Papers in Linguistics, 33 (Special issue on Adpositions, Ed. P. Svenonius) (pp. 200–219). Tromso: CASTL.
   Google Scholar
• Naigles, L. R., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9, 363–369. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, S. (2004). Goal and source: Asymmetry in their Syntax and Semantics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-Goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34, 1064–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98, B75–B87. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Lexical and structural biases in the acquisition of motion verbs. Language Learning and Development, 6, 87–115. doi: 10.1080/15475440903352781
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Regier, T. (1997). Constraints on the learning of spatial terms: A computational investigation. In R. Goldstone, P. Schyns, & D. Medin (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 36: Mechanisms of perceptual learning (pp. 171–271). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31, 705–719. doi: 10.1080/15326900701399954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selimis, S., & Katis, D. (2010). Motion descriptions in English and Greek: A cross-typological developmental study of conversations and narratives. Linguistik Online, 42, 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Skordos, D., & Papafragou, A. (2014). Lexical, syntactic and semantic-geometric factors in the acquisition of motion predicates. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1985–1998. doi: 10.1037/a0036970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., Carstensen, A., Regier, T., & Xu, Y. (2016). A computational investigation of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: The case of spatial relations. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ünal, E., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2017). How children map event participants onto language. Talk at the 14th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Lyon, 17–21 July.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Thought before language: How deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures. Cognition, 85, 145–175. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00105-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar