Phonetic encoding in utterance production: a review of open issues from 1989 to 2018

References

• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88, 148–159. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00296-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., Goslin, J., Michel, V., & Laganaro, M. (2010). The functional origin of foreign accent: Evidence from the syllable frequency effect in bilingual speakers. Psychological Science, 21, 15–20. doi: 10.1177/0956797609354725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderete, J, & Tupper, P. (2018). Phonological regularity, perceptual biases, and the role of phonotactics in speech error analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, 9(e1466). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1466
   Google Scholar
• Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 527–554. doi: 10.1080/01690960802299378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. (1990). Phonological deficits in aphasia: Theoretical perspectives. In A. Caramazza (Ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp. 33–53). Hillsdalle: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E., Cooper, W. E., Goodglass, H., Statlender, S., & Gottlieb, J. (1980). Production deficits in aphasia: A voice-onset time analysis. Brain and Language, 9, 153–170. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(80)90137-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H. (2010). Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1504–1529. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendel, B., Hertrich, I., Erb, M., Lindner, A., Riecker, A., Grodd, W., & Ackermann, H. (2010). The contribution of mesiofrontal cortex to the preparation and execution of repetitive syllable productions: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 50, 1219–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1988). Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica, 45, 140–155. doi: 10.1159/000261823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201–251. doi: 10.1017/S0952675700001019
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2011). Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: Evidence from sound-production impairment. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1113–1119. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürki, A., Pellet, P., & Laganaro, M. (2015). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? ERP comparison of high frequency and novel syllable production. Brain and Language, 150, 90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 109–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C. (1998). Major review: Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 12, 47–65. doi: 10.3109/02699209808985212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, A. (1981). Syllables and segments in speech production. Linguistics, 19, 663–716. doi: 10.1515/ling.1981.19.7-8.663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croot, K., Lalas, G., Biedermann, B., Rastle, K., Jones, K., & Cholin, J. (2017). Syllable frequency effects in immediate but not delayed syllable naming in English. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1119–1132. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1284340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1975). Motor speech disorders. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericcson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesche-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, S. A., & Write, R. (2000). The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 139–162. doi: 10.1006/jpho.2002.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: de Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 649–683. doi: 10.1080/01690960500181332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Chu, K. (2014). Gradient co-activation and speech error articulation: Comment on Pouplier and Goldstein 2010. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 452–458. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.807347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Keshet, J., Gustafson, E., Heller, J., & Needle, J. (2016). Automatic analysis of slips of the tongue: Insights into the cognitive architecture of speech production. Cognition, 149, 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103, 386–412. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (2002). Neural control of speech movements. In A. Meyer, & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 209–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280–301. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105, 611–633. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.611-633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. doi: 10.1038/nrn3158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2014). The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing. Language and Cognitive Process, 29, 2–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Language Sciences, 2, 255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology: Description and theory. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1990). Between-word speech errors in conduction aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 133–156. doi: 10.1080/02643299008253440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakow, R. A. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 23–54. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, B. J., Kannampuzha, J., & Neuschaefer-Rube, C. (2009). Towards a neurocomputational model of speech production and perception. Speech Communication, 51, 793–809. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowski, K., & Blumstein, S. E. (2016). Phonetic basis of phonemic paraphasias in aphasia: Evidence for cascading activation. Cortex, 75, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Alario, F. X. (2006). On the locus of syllable frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 178–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Croisier, M., Bagou, O., & Assal, F. (2012). Progressive apraxia of speech as a window into the study of speech planning processes. Cortex, 48, 963–971. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Python, G., & Toepel, U. (2013). Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: Evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls. Brain and Language, 126, 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Zimmermann, C. (2010). Origin of phoneme substitution and phoneme movement errors in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1–37. doi: 10.1080/01690960902719259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljeström, M., Kujala, J., Stevenson, C., & Salmelin, R. (2015). Dynamic reconfiguration of the language network preceding onset of speech in picture naming. Human Brain Mapping, 36(3), 1202–1216. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, C. T., & Corley, M. (2010). Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation. Cognition, 117, 243–260. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramirez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82. doi: 10.1126/science.1139940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42, 181–211. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., Pulvermuller, F., & Hauk, O. (2015). Early parallel activation of semantics and phonology in picture naming: Evidence from a multiple linear regression MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 3343–3355. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, J., Jansma, B. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). What the brain does before the tongue slips. Cerebral Cortex, 17(5), 1173–1178. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaco, E., Pellet, P., & Laganaro, M. (2017). Facilitation and interference of phoneme repetition and phoneme similarity in speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 650–660. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1257730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munding, D., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). On the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the MEG evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 441–462. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory phonology VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–139.
   Google Scholar
• Pouplier, M., & Hardcastle, W. (2005). A re-evaluation of the nature of speech errors in normal and disordered speakers. Phonetica, 62, 227–243. doi: 10.1159/000090100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173–200. doi: 10.1080/016909699386338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmelin, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., & Sams, M. (1994). Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature, 368, 463–465. doi: 10.1038/368463a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., Meyer, A. S., & Baayen, R. H. (1996). A comparison of lexeme and speech syllables in Dutch. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 8–28. doi: 10.1080/09296179608590060
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper, & E. C. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 295–342). Hillsdale: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1992). The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering. Cognition, 42, 213–259. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90044-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger, A., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22, 1201–1215. doi: 10.1080/02687030701820584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms. NeuroImage, 163, 206–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente A, Pinet S, Alario F-X, Laganaro M. (2016) “When” does picture naming take longer than word reading? Frontiers in Psychology 7, 31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe, A. (2008). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed., pp. 407–409). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, S. O., & Varley, R. A. (1998). A reconceptualisation of apraxia of speech: A synthesis of evidence. Cortex, 34, 221–231. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70749-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. (2002). Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16, 169–197. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2008). Apraxia of speech. In G. Goldenberg, & B. L. Miller (Eds.), Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology (pp. 269–286). Edinburgh: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2009). Modelling the architecture of phonetic plans: Evidence from apraxia of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 631–661. doi: 10.1080/01690960802327989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar