ERP Effects of masked orthographic neighbour priming in deaf readers

References

• Andrews, S. (2008). Lexical expertise and reading skill. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 49, 247–281. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 139(2), 299–318. doi: 10.1037/a0018366
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163. doi: 10.1037/a0024953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, L., Pezzulo, G., Castrataro, M., Rinaldi, P., Caselli, M. C., & Paterson, K. (2013). Visual word recognition in deaf readers: Lexicality is modulated by communication mode. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, J. R., & Harris, M. (1997). The prelingually deaf young reader: A case of reliance on direct lexical access? Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 105–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00024
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., Baum, S. R., & Mayberry, R. I. (2012). Reading difficulties in adult deaf readers of French: Phonological codes, not guilty!. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 263–285. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.568555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2013). Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2237–2252. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2015). What eye movements reveal about deaf readers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 220–226. doi: 10.1177/0963721414567527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, D., Caclin, A., Giard, M.-H., Pavani, F., & Sirigu, A. (2011). Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1977–1989. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Midgley, K. J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2017). Interactions in the neighborhood: Effects of orthographic and phonological neighbors on N400 amplitude. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 41, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cripps, J. H., McBride, K. A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Lexical processing with deaf and hearing: Phonology and orthographic masked priming. Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 12, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70. doi: 10.3758/BF03206399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 107–143). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Elsherif, M., Wheeldon, L. R., & Frisson, S. (2018). Lexical and phonological precision for word and pseudoword recognition in skilled readers. Paper presented at the Psycholinguistics in Flanders, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., & Weisberg, J. (2016). The neural underpinnings of reading skill in deaf adults. Brain and Language, 160, 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Lopéz, M., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (in press). Can response congruency effects be obtained in masked priming lexical decision? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, D. C., & Joanisse, M. F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: Evidence from lexical decision. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 375–388. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2014). Phonological and orthographic overlap effects in fast and masked priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1742–1767. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.869614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: Effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(5), 951–964. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A(6), 981–998. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000386
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2017). Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 106, 261–279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, V. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 199–207. doi: 10.3758/BF03197717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshorn, E. A., Dye, M. W. G., Hauser, P., Supalla, T. R., & Bavelier, D. (2015). The contribution of phonological knowledge, memory, and language background to reading comprehension in deaf populations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1153), 1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(8), 1101–1110. doi: 10.3758/BF03208367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual Achievement test - Revised manual. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory & Cognition, 6(5), 568–581. doi: 10.3758/BF03198246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Holcomb, P. J. (2010). Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: An ERP investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 162–174. doi: 10.1037/a0017614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 164–188. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, L., & Parrila, R. (2009). Phonological representations in deaf children: Rethinking the “functional equivalence” hypothesis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 137–154. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, G., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., Emmorey, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming. Brain Research, 1685, 29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2009). Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(3), 281–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Clark, M. D. (2011). Phonemic awareness is not necessary to become a skilled deaf reader. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 459–476. doi: 10.1007/s10882-011-9246-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P., Occhibo-Kehoe, C., Piñar, P., Wilkinson, E., & Kroll, J. F. (2017). The time course of cross-language activation in deaf ASL-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 337–350. doi: 10.1017/S136672891500067X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavani, F., & Bottari, D. (2012). Visual abilities in individuals with profound deafness: A critical review. In M. M. Murray & M. T. Wallace (Eds.), The neural bases of multisensory processes (pp. 421–445). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Jiménez, M., & Gómez, P. (2014). A challenging dissociation in masked identity priming with the lexical decision task. Acta Psychologica, 148, 130–135. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Marcet, A., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Xu, B. (2016). Phonological-lexical feedback during early abstract encoding: The case of deaf readers. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32–50. doi: 10.1093/deafed/5.1.32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rastle, K. (in press). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000206
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Gómez, P., Jiménez, M., & Perea, M. (2015). Lexical enhancement during prime-target integration: ERP evidence from matched-case identity priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 492–504. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0330-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welcome, S. E., & Trammel, E. R. (2019). ERPs reveal relationships between neural orthographic priming effects and reading skill. Journal of Psychophysiology, 33, 76–84. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1385–1397. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 452–457. doi: 10.3758/BF03196594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar