The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: structural and semantic influences

References

• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicknell, K., Elman, J. L., Hare, M., McRae, K., & Kutas, M. (2010). Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodal inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33, 261–304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex Farm. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/ibexfarm
   Google Scholar
• Dziak, J. J., Coffman, D. L., Lanza, S. T., Li, R., & Jermiin, L. S. (2019). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Briefings in Bioinformatics, bbz016. doi: 10.1101/449751. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Yang, Z. (2019). The problem of comprehension in psycholinguistic. Discourse Processes. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1591885. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T. R., & McRae, K. (1999). Modeling the role of plausibility and verb-bias in the direct object/sentence complement ambiguity. Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the cognitive science society, 89, 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Fraundorf, P. (n.d.). Examples of Surprisal. Retrieved from http://www.umsl.edu/~fraundorfp/egsurpri.html
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 437–468. doi: 10.1007/BF02143161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S, Jurafsky, D, & Roland, D. (2004). Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 432–443. doi: 10.3758/BF03195591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 281–303. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00516-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2004). Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(2), 181–224. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668–689. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M. (2001). Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 132–138. doi: 10.3758/BF03196149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizach, J., Nyvad, A. M., & Christensen, K. R. (2013). Structure before meaning: Sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e76326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2009). People use their knowledge of common events to understand language, and do so as quickly as possible. Language Linguistics Compass, 3(6), 1417–1429. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00174.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohamed, M. T., & Clifton, C. (2011). Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: The effect of contextual bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 1797–1820. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.582127
   Google Scholar
• Newmeyer, F. J. (2006). On Gahl and Garnsey on grammar and usage. Language, 82(2), 399–404. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Kim, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: Lexical priming, parsing, and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 57–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1021985032200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 786–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., Traxler, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43(4), 447–475. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2708
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi: 10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Roark, B. (2001). Probabilistic top-down parsing and language modeling. Computational Linguistics, 27(2), 249–276. doi: 10.1162/089120101750300526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark, B., Bachrach, A., Cardenas, C., & Pallier, C. (2009). Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1, 324–333. doi: 10.3115/1699510.1699553
   Google Scholar
• Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 348–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, D., Elman, J. L., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition, 98(3), 245–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Levy, R. (2011). Cloze but no cigar: The complex relationship between cloze, corpus, and subjective probabilities in language processing. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33, 1637–1642.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 605–611. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 102–123. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M. (2009). Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 368–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar