How long can you hold the filler: maintenance and retrieval

References

• Acuña-Fariña, J. C., Meseguer, E., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Gender and number agreement in comprehension in Spanish. Lingua, 143, 108–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 23–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Lewis, R. L. (2009). In search of decay in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 317–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 774–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 26, 211–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Gibson, E., & Wolf, F. (2005). Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 144–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, W.-Y., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6), 1297–1307. doi: 10.1177/1747021818804988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 85–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 250–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(3), 427–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2008). The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 329–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 93–126.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Flores D’Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(3), 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7(1), 55–78.
   Google Scholar
• Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial [sentential] complexity. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology, 29(2), 261–290.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, L. A., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 94(C), 316–339.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keine, S. (2015). Locality domains in syntax: Evidence from sentence processing (Ms.). University of Massachusetts Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Brehm, L., & Yoshida, M. (2019). The online processing of noun phrase ellipsis and mechanisms of antecedent retrieval. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), 190–213. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1513542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Shalom, D. E., Sigman, M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. W. (2004). Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 51–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Geiger, S. M., & Oberauer, K. (2008). Interference-based forgetting in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(2), 200–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 817–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Bever, T. G. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: Time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 53–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani, K., & Gibson, E. (2008). Distinguishing theories of syntactic expectation cost in sentence comprehension: Evidence from Japanese. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 46(1), 63.
   Google Scholar
• Nicenboim, B., Logačev, P., Gattei, C., & Vasishth, S. (2016). When high-capacity readers slow down and low-capacity readers speed up: Working memory and locality effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 280–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Engelmann, F., & Suckow, K. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses in sentence processing: A case study of number interference in German. Cognitive Science, 42(S4), 1075–1100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Gattei, C., Sigman, M., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 312. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross–modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1229–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J., Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1997). Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(4), 569–587. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 5–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 601–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., Lau, E. F., Davidson White, I., Dakan, M. L., Apple, A., & Phillips, C. (2015). Hyper-active gap filling. Frontiers in Psychology, 06, 384.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Phillips, C. (2017). Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 272–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 427–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (2006). The real-time status of island phenomena. Language, 82(4), 795–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Wagers, M., & Lau, E. F. (2011). Grammatical illusions adn selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. Syntax and Semantics 37: Experiments at the Interfaces, 37(2011), 53–186.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(3), 229–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. (2003). Linger: A flexible platform for language processing experiments, version 2.94, Online. Retrieved from http://tedlab.mit.edu/~dr/Linger
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D., & Phillips, C. (2001). Grammatical search and reanalysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 308–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Clifton, C. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either … or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 425–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanov, A., & Stateva, P. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for memory storage costs in filler-gap dependencies with wh-adjuncts. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowe, L. (1986). Parsing wh–constructions: Evidence for on–line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(3), 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2001). The preservation of structure in language comprehension: Is reanalysis the last resort? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 283–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Boland, J., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N. (1989). Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Grey, S., & van Hell, J. G. (2017). Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 54(2), 248–259. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 740–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 454–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 407–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasishth, S., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Guo, G., & Paterson, K. (2013). Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. (2006). Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language, 82(4), 767–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2009). Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension. Journal of Linguistics, 45(2), 395–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2014). Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1274–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Science, 85(1), 79–112.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (1978). Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(1), 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar