Nuclear vowel priming and anticipatory oral postures: evidence for parallel phonological planning?

References

• Averbeck, B. B., Chafee, M. V., Crowe, D. A., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2002). Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(20), 13172–13177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltrusaitis, T., Zadeh, A., Lim, Y. C., & Morency, L. (2018). OpenFace 2.0: Facial Behavior Analysis Toolkit. 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018)(FG), Xi'an, China, pp. 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2018). Parsimonious mixed models. Available from arXiv:1506.04967 (stat.ME).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H. (2010). Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1504–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N. (1995). A solvable connectionist model of immediate recall of ordered lists. In G. Tesauro, D. S. Touretzky, & T. K. Leen (Eds.). Advances in neural information processing systems (p. 7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, C. B., Gevers, W., & Verguts, T. (2018). The unfolding action model of initiation times, movement times, and movement paths. Psychological Review, 125(5), 785–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99(2), 205–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, E., & Corley, M. (2015). Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 43(8), 1136–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P. E., Remez, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In G. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 373–420). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimura, O., & Lovins, J. B. (1978). Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., McClain, R., Cibelli, E., Adi, Y., Gustafson, E., Moers, C., & Keshet, J. (2018). The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, T., & Houghton, G. (1996). A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, B. B., Kawamoto, A. H., & Liu, Q. (2019). Task demands and segment priming effects in the naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 807–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Hartley, T. (1996). Parallel models of serial behaviour: Lashley revisited. Psyche: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, 2(25).
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 862–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., & Kello, C. T. (2015). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: Evidence and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Lee, R. J., & Grebe, P. R. (2014). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Kawamoto, A. H. (1998). Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming responses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30(3), 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S. (2000). The left-to-right nature of the masked onset priming effect in naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, V. A., & Chistovich, L. A. (1965). Speech: Articulation and perception. Oxford, UK: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2019). Anticipatory mechanisms influence articulation in the form preparation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(3), 319–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior; The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). ACL-MIT Press series in natural-language processing. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 217–245).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2010). Simulating the elimination and enhancement of the plosivity effect in reading aloud. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2284–2289). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Kawamoto, A. H., Payne, K. K., & Dorsey, G. N. (2018). Anticipatory coarticulation and the minimal planning unit of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 139–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mik, L., Lorenc, A., Król, D., Wielgat, R., Święciński, R., & Jędryka, R. (2018). Fusing the electromagnetic articulograph, high-speed video cameras and a 16-channel microphone array for speech analysis. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 66(3), 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, M., Kinoshita, S., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2016). The emergence of a phoneme-sized unit in L2 speech production: Evidence from Japanese-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H., & Saltzman, E. (2003, August 3–9). A competitive, coupled oscillator model of syllable structure. Proc. XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• O’Séaghdha, P. G., & Frazer, A. K. (2014). The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 797–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, M., Shadle, C., & Iskarous, K. (2006). An MRI study of vocalic context effects and lip rounding in the production of English sibilants. In P. Warren & C. I. Watson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australian international conference on speech science & technology (pp. 307–312). Auckland, New Zealand: Australian Speech Science & Technology Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2000). Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms. Human Movement Science, 19, 499–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1, 333–382.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2013). A dynamical model of hierarchical selection and coordination in speech planning. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2016). Selection and coordination: The articulatory basis for the emergence of phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 53–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S., Spincemaille, P., Xu, B., Doerschuk, P., Luh, W.-M., Feldman, E., & Wang, Y. (2016). Anticipatory posturing of the vocal tract reveals dissociation of speech movement plans from linguistic units. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 356–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding in speech recognition, articulation, and developments. In K. N. Leibovec (Ed.), Information processing in the nervous system (pp. 85–96). New York: Springer-Verlag New York.
   Google Scholar