Context-dependent categorisation of vowels: a mismatch negativity study of positional neutralisation

References

• Barbosa, P. A., & Albano, E. C. (2004). Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34(2), 227–232. doi: 10.1017/S0025100304001756
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, P. A., Eriksson, A., & Akesson, J. (2013). On the robustness of some acoustic parameters for signalling word stress across styles in Brazilian Portuguese. In Interspeech 2013 (pp. 282–286). Lyon, France: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. (2006). Strength and weakness at the interface: Positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. G., Hardiman, M. J., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2009). Mismatch response to polysyllabic nonwords: A neurophysiological signature of language learning capacity. PLOS ONE, 4(7), e6270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv:1406.5823 [Stat]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, J. N. (2013). Positional faithfulness: An optimality theoretic treatment of phonological asymmetries. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29(4), 1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.23). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A., Peter, V., Wijnen, F., Schnack, H., & Burnham, D. (2018). Are lexical tones musical? Native language’s influence on neural response to pitch in different domains. Brain and Language, 180–182, 31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1(5), 351–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheour, M., Korpilahti, P., Martynova, O., & Lang, A.-H. (2001). Mismatch negativity and late discriminative negativity in investigating speech perception and learning in children and infants. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 6(1), 2–11. doi: 10.1159/000046804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. A., Lahiri, A., & Eulitz, C. (2011). “What you encode is not necessarily what you store”: Evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity. Brain Research, 1394, 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosswhite, K. (2004). Vowel reduction. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 191–231). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Baene, W., Vandierendonck, A., Leman, M., Widmann, A., & Tervaniemi, M. (2004). Roughness perception in sounds: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Biological Psychology, 67(3), 319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. Neuroreport, 8(4), 919–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. NeuroImage, 24(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delattre, P. (1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 7(4), 295–326. doi: 10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.295
   Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007). Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. NeuroImage, 34(4), 1443–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M. F., Kewley-Port, D., Brady, S., & Turvey, M. T. (1977). Vowel recognition: Inferences from studies of forward and backward masking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(3), 483–497. doi: 10.1080/14640747708400624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulitz, C., & Lahiri, A. (2004). Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey, R. P., & Diehl, R. L. (1996). The missing fundamental in vowel height perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(5), 725–733. doi: 10.3758/BF03213105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fails, W., & Clegg, J. H. (1992). A spectrographic analysis of Portuguese stressed and unstressed vowels. In D. Macedo, & D. Koike (Eds.), Romance Linguistics: The Portuguese context (pp. 31–42). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, E. (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology, 18(1), 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, D., Maurer, D., Rosen, S., & Dellwo, V. (2017). Vowel recognition at fundamental frequencies up to 1 kHz reveals point vowels as acoustic landmarks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1025–1033. doi: 10.1121/1.4998706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frömer, R., Maier, M., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2018). Group-level EEG-processing Pipeline for flexible single trial-based analyses including linear mixed models. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011a). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: A critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1711–1725. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011b). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields II: Simulation studies. Psychophysiology, 48(12), 1726–1737. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01272.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2005). Vowel reduction as information loss. In P. Carr & C. J. Durand, J. Ewen (Eds.), Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity (pp. 119–132). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hestvik, A., & Durvasula, K. (2016). Neurobiological evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain and Language, 152, 28–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. R., McArthur, G. M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2004). Phonological categorization of vowels: A mismatch negativity study. Neuroreport, 15(14), 2195–2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoemeke, K. A., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Perception of vowel height: The role of F₁-F₀ distance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(2, Pt 1), 661–674. doi: 10.1121/1.410305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010). Speech perception as categorization. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1218–1227. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., & Csépe, V. (2013). Saliency or template? ERP evidence for long-term representation of word stress. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honbolygó, F., Kolozsvári, O., & Csépe, V. (2017). Processing of word stress related acoustic information: A multi-feature MMN study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 118, 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacewicz, E., & Fox, R. A. (2018). Regional variation in fundamental frequency of American English vowels. Phonetica, 75(4), 273–309. doi: 10.1159/000484610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanina, N., Phillips, C., & Idsardi, W. (2006). The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(30), 11381–11386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604821103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenstowicz, M., & Sandalo, F. (2016). Pretonic vowel reduction in Brazilian Portuguese: Harmony and dispersion. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 15(0), doi: 10.5334/jpl.7
   Google Scholar
• Kewley-Port, D. (2001). Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(4), 2141–2155. doi: 10.1121/1.1400737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewley-Port, D., Li, X., Zheng, Y., & Neel, A. T. (1996). Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4), 2462–2470. doi: 10.1121/1.417954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawyer, L. A., & Corina, D. P. (2017). Distinguishing underlying and surface variation patterns in speech perception. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1176–1191. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1318213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawyer, L. A., & Corina, D. P. (2018). Putting underspecification in context: ERP evidence for sparse representations in morphophonological alternations. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(1), 50–64. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1359635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H. (2010). Contraste das vogais no PB e OT. Estudos Linguísticos, 39(1), 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H. (2013). Phonological variation and phonology as a comprehension grammar. Organon, 28(54), 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Massini-Cagliari, G., Cagliari, L. C., & Redenbarger, W. J. (2016). A comparative study of the sounds of European and Brazilian Portuguese. In The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 56–68). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118791844.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Mateus, M. H., & d’Andrade, E. (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miglietta, S., Grimaldi, M., & Calabrese, A. (2013). Conditioned allophony in speech perception: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 126(3), 285–290. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, J. A. d. (1998). Intonation in Brazilian Portuguese. In D. Hirst, & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems (pp. 179–194). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulines, E., & Charpentier, F. (1990). Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication, 9(5), 453–467. doi: 10.1016/0167-6393(90)90021-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R. (2001). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3810001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., & Winkler, I. (2011). Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology, 48(1), 4–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01114.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., … Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385(6615), 432–434. doi: 10.1038/385432a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24(4), 375–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 826–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeu, M. (2014). Stress- and speech rate-induced vowel quality variation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins, A. (2012). Vowel lenition and fortition in Brazilian Portuguese. Letras de Hoje, 47(3), 228–233.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (2001). Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognitive Science, 25(5), 711–731. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B. (1972). Perceptual processing time for consonants and vowels (Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Perception No. SR-31/32) (pp. 83–92). New Haven, CT: Haskins Laboratories. Retrieved from http://www.haskins.yale.edu/SR/SR031/SR031_08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 564–573.
   Google Scholar
• Rosario-Martinez, H. D., Fox, J., & R Core Team. (2015). phia: Post-Hoc Interaction Analysis (Version 0.2-1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=phia
   Google Scholar
• Salo, S., Lang, A. H., Aaltonen, O., Lertola, K., & Kärki, T. (1999). Automatic detection of frequency changes depends on auditory stimulus intensity. Ear and Hearing, 20(3), 265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, A. P. (2018). The role of phonological processes in determining the vowel inventory of Brazilian Portuguese. Acta Linguistica Academica, 65(1), 69–86. doi: 10.1556/2062.2018.65.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Scharinger, M., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others. PloS One, 7(7), e40953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharinger, M., Lahiri, A., & Eulitz, C. (2010). Mismatch negativity effects of alternating vowels in morphologically complex word forms. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(4), 383–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharinger, M., Monahan, P. J., & Idsardi, W. J. (2012). Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(3), 903–918. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0065)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharinger, M., Monahan, P. J., & Idsardi, W. J. (2016). Linguistic category structure influences early auditory processing: Converging evidence from mismatch responses and cortical oscillations. NeuroImage, 128, 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter, K. T., Politzer-Ahles, S., Al Kaabi, M., & Almeida, D. (2017). Laryngeal features are phonetically abstract: Mismatch negativity evidence from Arabic, English, and Russian. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter, K. T., Politzer-Ahles, S., & Almeida, D. (2016). No place for /h/: An ERP investigation of English fricative place features. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1151058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröger, E. (1996). The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 100(6), 517–526. doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95576-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schröger, E. (1998). Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30(1), 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Mill, R. W., Bőhm, T. M., & Winkler, I. (2014). Predictive regularity representations in violation detection and auditory stream segregation: From conceptual to computational models. Brain Topography, 27(4), 565–577. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0334-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (1999). Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(2), 1078–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5 Pt 1), 2697–2703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, D. M. R., Melges, D. B., & Rothe-Neves, R. (2017). N1 response attenuation and the mismatch negativity (MMN) to within- and across-category phonetic contrasts. Psychophysiology, 54(4), 591–600. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, D. M. R., & Rothe-Neves, R. (2016). Perception of height and categorization of Brazilian Portuguese front vowels. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 32(2), 355–373. doi: 10.1590/0102-4450984064164376868
   Google Scholar
• Spahr, C. (2014). A contrastive hierarchical account of positional neutralization. The Linguistic Review, 31(3–4), 551–585. doi: 10.1515/tlr-2014-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steriade, D. (1994). Positional neutralization and the expression of contrast. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/812b/be5afa77bf089a7d3ee1788a148e264e9269.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, E. S., Chen, S., Sussman-Fort, J., & Dinces, E. (2014). The five Myths of MMN: Redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research. Brain Topography, 27(4), 553–564. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0326-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrdal, A. K., & Gopal, H. S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79(4), 1086–1100. doi: 10.1121/1.393381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervaniemi, M., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1997). Pre-attentive categorization of sounds by timbre as revealed by event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 8(11), 2571–2574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traunmüller, H. (1981). Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69(5), 1465–1475. doi: 10.1121/1.385780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traunmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(1), 97–100. doi: 10.1121/1.399849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtala, P., Partanen, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Kujala, T. (2018). Neural discrimination of speech sound changes in a variable context occurs irrespective of attention and explicit awareness. Biological Psychology, 132, 217–227. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Bersick, M. (2005). ERP correlates of involuntary attention capture by prosodic salience in speech. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00260.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, W. L. (2011). The representation of vowel height and vowel height neutralization in Brazilian Portuguese. In J. A. Goldsmith, E. Hume, & W. L. Wetzels (Eds.), Tones and features: Phonetic and phonological perspectives (pp. 331–359). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H., & Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 23(3), 349–366. doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modelling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(12), 532–540. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., … Näätänen, R. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 638–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Lehtokoski, A., Alku, P., Vainio, M., Czigler, I., Csépe, V., … Näätänen, R. (1999). Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. Cognitive Brain Research, 7(3), 357–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Event-related potentials in auditory backward recognition masking: A new way to study the neurophysiological basis of sensory memory in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 140(2), 239–242. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90111-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Event-related brain potentials reflect traces of echoic memory in humans. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 443–449. doi: 10.3758/BF03206788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zachau, S., Rinker, T., Körner, B., Kohls, G., Maas, V., Hennighausen, K., & Schecker, M. (2005). Extracting rules: Early and late mismatch negativity to tone patterns. NeuroReport, 16(18), 2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., & Tohkura, Y. (2005). Effects of language experience: Neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. NeuroImage, 26(3), 703–720. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar