Cognitive loads and time courses related to word order preference in Kaqchikel sentence production: an NIRS and eye-tracking study

References

• Aissen, J. L. (1992). Topic and focus in Mayan. Language, 68, 43–80. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajsivinac Sian, J. E., García Matzar, L. P. O., Cutzal, M. C., & Alonzo Guaján, I. E. (2004). Gramática descriptiva del idioma maya Kaqchikel: Rutzijoxik rucholik ri Kaqchikel ch’ab’äl. Chimaltenango: Comunidad Lingüística Kaqchikel de la Academia de las Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 121–143. doi: 10.1023/A:1023206208142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. Cambridge: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, J. (1984). Some problems with the concept of basic word order. Linguistics, 22, 711–736. doi: 10.1515/ling.1984.22.5.711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chujo, K. (1983). The interrelationships among strategies for sentence comprehension. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 54, 250–256. (published in Japanese). doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.54.250
   Google Scholar
• De Smedt, K. (1990). IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp. 167–192). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• England, N. C. (1991). Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 57, 446–486. doi: 10.1086/ijal.57.4.3519735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Missé, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque. Brain and Language, 109, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Matzar, P. O., & Rodríguez Guaján, J. O. (1997). Rukemik ri Kaqchikel chi’: Gramática kaqchikel. Ciudad de Guatemala: Editorial Cholsamaj.
   Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., Mirković, J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2012). Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2000). Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project Symposium (pp. 95–126). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S. T., Brink, K., Bergen, L., Lim, E., & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation. Psychological Science, 24, 1079–1088. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 544–569. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewe, T., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Zysset, S., Wiese, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in the processing of unmarked transitivity. NeuroImage, 35, 343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiwara, H., Soshi, T., Ishihara, M., & Imanaka, K. (2007). A topographical study on the event-related potential correlates of scrambled word order in Japanese complex sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 175–193. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakulinen, A., & Karlsson, F. (1980). Finnish syntax in text: Methodology and some results of a quantitative study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 3, 93–129. doi: 10.1017/S0332586500000536
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. L., Mayberry, R. I., & Ferreira, V. S. (2013). Cognitive constraints on constituent order: Evidence from elicited pantomime. Cognition, 129, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homae, F., Watanabe, H., Nakano, T., & Taga, G. (2007). Prosodic processing in the developing brain. Neuroscience Research, 59, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshi, Y. (2003). Functional near-infrared optical imaging: Utility and limitations in human brain mapping. Psychophysiology, 40, 511–520. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura, S., & Koizumi, M. (2011). A centering analysis of word order in Japanese. Tohoku Studies in Linguistics, 20, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94, 113–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2012). Priming effects in scrambled sentences in Korean. Culture, 75, 228–213. (published in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Koizumi, M., Ikuta, N., Fukumitsu, Y., Kimura, N., Iwata, K., … Kawashima, R. (2009). Scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinno, R., Kawamura, M., Shioda, S., & Sakai, K. L. (2008). Neural correlates of non-canonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture-sentence matching task. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 1015–1027. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., Kim, J., & Koizumi, M. (2013). Effect of animacy on word order processing in Kaqchikel Maya. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 203–207. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.33027
   Google Scholar
• Koizumi, M., & Imamura, S. (2017). Interaction between syntactic structure and information structure in the processing of a head-final language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 247–260. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9433-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi, M., & Kim, J. (2016). Greater left inferior frontal activation for SVO than VOS during sentence comprehension in Kaqchikel. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1541–1549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi, M., Yasugi, Y., Tamaoka, K., Kiyama, S., Kim, J., Ajsivinac Sian, J. E., & García Matzar, P. O. (2014). On the (non) universality of the preference for subject-object word order in sentence comprehension: A sentence-processing study in Kaqchikel Maya. Language, 90, 722–736. doi: 10.1353/lan.2014.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovelman, I., Shalinsky, M. K., White, K., Schmitt, S. N., Berens, M. S., Paymer, N., & Petitto, L.-A. (2009). Dual language use in sign-speech bimodal bilinguals: FNIRS brain-imaging evidence. Brain and Language, 109, 112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J. (2015). Referential precedents in spoken language comprehension: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo, T., Ono, H., Tanaka, M., Koizumi, M., & Sakai, H. (2015). Mechanisms for VOS sentence production in Kaqchikel: Evidence from animacy effects on choice of word order. Cognitive Studies, 22, 591–603. (published in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. W. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Incrementality in language production. Cognition, 129, 544–562. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. (2005). Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review, 22, 429–445. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. M., & Little, W. E. (2006). Tijonïk Kaqchikel oxlajuj aj -Curso de idioma y cultura maya Kaqchikel. Guatemala: Editorial Junajpu.
   Google Scholar
• Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Costs of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East Asian languages (pp. 131–166). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. L., Bock, K., & Kelly, M. H. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188–230. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minagawa-Kawai, Y., Mori, K., Furuya, I., Hayashi, R., & Sato, Y. (2002). Assessing cerebral representations of short and long vowel categories by NIRS. Neuroreport, 13, 581–584. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200204160-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minagawa-Kawai, Y., Mori, K., Sato, Y., & Koizumi, T. (2004). Differential cortical responses in second language learners to different vowel contrasts. Neuroreport, 15, 899–903. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200404090-00033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momma, S., & Phillips, C. (2018). The relationship between parsing and generation. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 233–254. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myachykov, A., & Tomlin, R. S. (2008). Perceptual priming and structural choice in Russian sentence production. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9, 31–48. doi: 10.17791/jcs.2008.9.1.31
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi, Y., Takeuchi, T., & Sakai, K. L. (2002). Lateralized activation in the inferior frontal cortex during syntactic processing: Event-related optical topography study. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 89–99. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcliffe, E., Konopka, A. E., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 1187–1208. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1006238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka, Y., Nakato, E., Kanazawa, S., Yamaguchi, M. K., Watanabe, S., & Kakigi, R. (2007). Neural activation to upright and inverted faces in infants measured by near infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage, 34, 399–406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, B., & Whitman, J. (1995). Syntactic representation and interpretive preference. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing. Lawrence Erlbaum and associates (pp. 65–76). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Guaján, J. O. (1994). Rutz’ib’axik ri Kaqchikel: Manual de redacción Kaqchikel. Ciudad de Guatemala: Editorial Cholsamaj.
   Google Scholar
• Ros, I., Santesteban, M., Fukumura, K., & Laka, I. (2015). Aiming at shorter dependencies: The role of agreement morphology. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 1156–1174. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.994009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Roeder, B., & Hennighausen, E. (1998). Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 150–176. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeter, M., Zysset, S., Kruggel, F., & von Cramon, D. (2003). Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage, 19, 555–564. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00155-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekerina, I. A. (1997). The syntax and processing of Russian scrambled constructions in Russian (Doctoral Dissertation). City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, H., Sugiyama, T., Suzuki, M., Kim, J., Gyoba, J., & Koizumi, M. (2006). Nihongo-setsunai-kakimazebun-no konsekiitishuuhen-ni okeru shorikatei-no kentou. Cognitive Studies, 13, 301–315. (published in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strangman, G., Culver, J. P., Thompson, J. H., & Boas, D. A. (2002). A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation. NeuroImage, 17, 719–731. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symeonidou, I., Dumontheil, I., Chow, W. Y., & Breheny, R. (2016). Development of online use of theory of mind during adolescence: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 81–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taga, G., Asakawa, K., Maki, A., Konishi, Y., & Koizumi, H. (2003). Brain imaging in awake infants by near-infrared optical topography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 10722–10727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1932552100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshima, Y., Saito, G., Tachibana, R., Asaoka, R., Gyoba, J., & Koizumi, M. (2014). Processing loads related to word order preference during sentence production in Japanese: An NIRS and eye tracking study. Tohoku Psycholog. Folia, 73, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tamaoka, K., Kanduboda, P. B. A., & Sakai, H. (2011). Effects of word order alternation on the sentence processing of Sinhalese written and spoken forms. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 1, 24–32. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2011.12004
   Google Scholar
• Tamaoka, K., & Koizumi, M. (2006). Issues on the scrambling effects in the processing of Japanese sentences: Reply to Miyamoto and Nakamura (2005) regarding the experimental study by Koizumi and Tamaoka (2004). Gengo Kenkyu, 129, 181–226.
   Google Scholar
• Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 281–332. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-3641-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. N., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Pickering, M. J. (2011). Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 318–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichoc, C. R., Sian, J. E. A., García Matzar, L. P. O., Espantzay, I. C., Cutzal, M. C., & Guajan, E. A. (2000). Runuk’ul pa rub’eyal rutz’ib’axik ri Kaqchikel ch’ab’ äl: Gramática normativa del idioma Maya Kaqchikel. Chimaltenango: Comunidad Lingüística Kaqchikel de la Academia de las Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.
   Google Scholar
• Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. (2003). Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain and Language, 86, 243–271. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00543-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, E., Maki, A., Kawaguchi, F., Takashiro, K., Yamashita, Y., Koizumi, H., & Mayanagi, Y. (1998). Non-invasive assessment of language dominance with near-infrared spectroscopic mapping. Neuroscience Letters, 256, 49–52. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00754-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, M., Yasunaga, D., & Koizumi, M. (2017). Event-related brain indices of gap-filling processing in Kaqchikel. In S. R. Harris (Ed.), Event-Related Potential (ERP): Methods, outcomes, research insights (pp. 89–122). Hauppauge: NOVA Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yasunaga, D., Yano, M., Yasugi, Y., & Koizumi, M. (2015). Is the subject-before-object preference universal? An event-related potential study in the Kaqchikel Mayan language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 1209–1229. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1080372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar