761
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

The time course of orthographic and semantic activation in Chinese character recognition: evidence from anERP study

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 292-309 | Received 18 Nov 2018, Accepted 29 Jul 2019, Published online: 07 Aug 2019

References

  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  • Barber, H. A., & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 98–123. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.07.002
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343–355. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2
  • Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(3), 235–260. doi: 10.1162/089892999563373
  • Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102(1), 146–184. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146
  • Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 34–44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34
  • Byrne, J. M., Dywan, C. A., & Connolly, J. F. (1995). Assessment of children’s receptive vocabulary using event-related brain potentials: Development of a clinically valid test. Child Neuropsychology, 1(3), 211–223. doi: 10.1080/09297049508400226
  • Caramazza, A. (1997). Access of phonological and orthographic lexical forms: Evidence from dissociations in reading and spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
  • Chen, B., Liu, W., Wang, L., Peng, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). The timing of graphic, phonological and semantic activation of high and low frequency Chinese characters: An ERP study. Progress in Natural Science, 17(B07), 62–70.
  • Chen, H.-C., & Juola, J. F. (1982). Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English. Memory & Cognition, 10(3), 216–224. doi: 10.3758/BF03197632
  • Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 511–518. doi: 10.3758/BF03196186
  • Chen, M. J., & Weekes, B. S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chinese Journal of Psychology.
  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589–608. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
  • DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawaii Press.
  • Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: Apriming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530
  • Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71
  • Hsiao, J. H., Shillcock, R., & Lee, C. (2007). Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: Evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition. Neuropsychologia, 45(6), 1280–1292. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.001
  • Hsu, C.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2009). Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 108(1), 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.002
  • Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: Acritical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255–270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
  • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
  • Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. doi: 10.1038/307161a0
  • Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1988). Event-related brain potential studies of language. In P. K. Ackles & J. R. Jennings (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (pp. 139–187). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 13. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  • Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
  • Law, S.-P., Yum, Y.-N., & Cheung, G. W.-L. (2017). Neural correlates of concreteness effect in semantic processing of single Chinese characters using mixed-effects modeling. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 223–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.07.001
  • Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Chan, W.-H., Hsu, C.-H., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: An event-related potentials study. Neuroreport, 18(2), 147–151. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328010d4e4
  • Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Huang, H.-W., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1121(1), 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.117
  • Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 285. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.285
  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
  • Lin, S.-E., Chen, H.-C., Zhao, J., Li, S., He, S., & Weng, X.-C. (2011). Left-lateralized N170 response to unpronounceable pseudo but not false Chinese characters—the key role of orthography. Neuroscience, 190, 200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.071
  • Liu, I.-M. (1995). Script factors that affect literacy: Alphabetic vs. logographic languages. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 145–162). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Liu, B., Jin, Z., Qing, Z., & Wang, Z. (2011). The processing of phonological, orthographical, and lexical information of Chinese characters in sentence contexts: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1372, 81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.068
  • Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2003). ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1231–1247. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1231
  • Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 107–128. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.107
  • McCandliss, B. D., & Noble, K. G. (2005). The development of reading impairment: Acognitive neuroscience model. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 1(3), 13–205.
  • Möhring, N., Shen, C., & Neuhaus, A. H. (2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics of early cortical gesture processing. NeuroImage, 99, 42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.061
  • Okano, K., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2013). An ERP investigation of visual word recognition in syllabary scripts. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 390–404. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0149-7
  • Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 101–118. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.101
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
  • Qu, Q., Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2016). Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming. Brain and Language, 159, 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.008
  • Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 71–104.doi: 10.1080/026432997381628
  • R Development Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
  • Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 643–647. doi: 10.2307/1128667
  • Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
  • Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896–918. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896
  • Su, I.-F., Mak, S.-C. C., Cheung, L.-Y. M., & Law, S.-P. (2012). Taking a radical position: Evidence for position-specific radical representations in Chinese character recognition using masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 333–343.
  • Taft, M., Li, P., Bates, E., Tan, L. H., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). Processing of characters by native Chinese readers. In Handbook of east Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 237–249). Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Tzeng, O. J., & Hung, D. L. (1978). Reading the Chinese character: Some basic research. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica.
  • Wang, K. (2011). An electrophysiological investigation of the role of orthography in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3), 297–301. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.041
  • Wang, W. S. Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228(2), 50–60. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0273-50
  • Wang, K., Mecklinger, A., Hofmann, J., & Weng, X. (2010). From orthography to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience, 165(1), 101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.070
  • Wang, X., Pei, M., Wu, Y., & Su, Y. (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioraland ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2230–2238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02230
  • Weekes, B., Davies, R., & Chen, M. J. (2002). Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese. In H. S. R. Kao, C. K. Leong, & D.-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neurosciences studies of the Chinese language (pp. 101–127). Hong Kong: HongKong University Press.
  • Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2(2), 149–168. doi: 10.1071/CH9490149
  • Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 461–480. doi: 10.1080/016909699386158
  • Wong, A. W.-K., Chiu, H.-C., Wang, J., Cao, J., Wong, S.-S., & Chen, H.-C. (2017). An early locus of associative and categorical context effects in speech production: Evidence from an ERP study using the picture–word interference paradigm. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(10), 1305–1319. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1355060
  • Wong, A.-K., Wu, Y., & Chen, H.-C. (2014). Limited role of phonology in reading Chinese two-character compounds: Evidence from an ERP study. Neuroscience, 256, 342–351. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.035
  • Wu, Y., Mo, D., Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080
  • Yum, Y. N., Law, S.-P., Su, I.-F., Lau, K.-Y. D., & Mo, K. N. (2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 315–327.
  • Zhang, Q., Chen, H.-C., Weekes, B. S., & Yang, Y. (2009). Independent effects of orthographic and phonological facilitation on spoken word production in Mandarin. Language and Speech, 52(1), 113–126. doi: 10.1177/0023830908099885
  • Zhang, Q., Feng, C., Zhu, X., & Wang, C. (2016). Transforming semantic interference into facilitation in a picture–word interference task. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1025–1049. doi: 10.1017/S014271641500034X
  • Zhang, C., Peng, G., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2013). Achieving constancy in spoken word identification: Time course of talker normalization. Brain and Language, 126(2), 193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.010
  • Zhang, Q., & Weekes, B. S. (2009). Orthographic facilitation effects on spoken word production: Evidence from Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7–8), 1082–1096. doi: 10.1080/01690960802042133
  • Zhao, J., Li, S., Lin, S.-E., Cao, X.-H., He, S., & Weng, X.-C. (2012). Selectivity of N170 in the left hemisphere as an electrophysiological marker for expertise in reading Chinese. Neuroscience Bulletin, 28(5), 577–584. doi: 10.1007/s12264-012-1274-y
  • Zhou, L., Fong, M. C.-M., Minett, J. W., Peng, G., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2014). Pre-lexical phonological processing in reading Chinese characters: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 30, 14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.03.002
  • Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 37–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Zhu, X., Damian, M. F., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007
  • Ziegler, J. C., Benraïss, A., & Besson, M. (1999). From print to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology, 36(6), 775–785. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3660775

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.