An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of phonological and orthographic encoding in written word production

References

• Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J. (2011). Phonological effects in handwriting production: Evidence from the implicit priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1474–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2009). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.999375-32) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package?lme4
   Google Scholar
• Baus, C., Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2013, December). When does word frequency influence written production? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 963. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2008). Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 20–34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Peereman, R. (1998). Masked form priming in writing words from pictures: Evidence for direct retrieval of orthographic codes. Acta Psychologica, 99, 311–328. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00017-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688–720. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D., & Kertesz, A. (1982). Evidence for lexicographic processing in a patient with preserved written over oral single word naming. Brain, 105, 697–717. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.4.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürki, A., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Tracking the time course of multi-word noun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 275–288. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Perea, M., Vergara, M., & Pollatsek, A. (2009). The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. Psychophysiology, 46(5), 1113–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00844.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1803–1817. doi: 10.1162/089892905774589217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 751–781. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. (2003). 现代汉语通用词表[Chinese lexicon] (CLDC-LAC-2003-001). Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C., & Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21442–21446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Dorjee, D., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2011). Long-term repetition priming in spoken and written word production: Evidence for a contribution of phonology to handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 813–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685–712. doi: 10.1080/01690960802351260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Qu, Q. (2013, October). Is handwriting constrained by phonology? Evidence from Stroop tasks with written responses and Chinese characters. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2009). Advance planning of form properties in the written production of single and multiple words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 555–579. doi: 10.1080/01690960802346500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunabeitia, J. A., Molinaro, N., Laka, I., Estevez, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: ‘Casual’ or ‘causal’? Cognitive Neurosciences and Neuropsychology, 20, 381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganushchak, L. Y., Christoffels, I. K., & Schiller, N. O. (2011, September). The use of electroencephalography in language production research: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, N. (1969). Problems in the anatomical understanding of the aphasias. In A. L. Benton (Ed.), Contributions to clinical neuropsychology (pp. 107–128). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Research, 1270, 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, D., & Buchwald, J. S. (1991). Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 240–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00417.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011, October). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., Garrett, M. F., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 951–964. doi: 10.1162/089892902760191162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Perret, C. (2011). Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topography, 24, 19–29. doi: 10.1007/s10548-010-0162-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Hao, M., Li, P., & Shu, H. (2011). Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese. PLoS ONE, 6(1), e16505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., & Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision, and response factors in picture–word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology, and treatment. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Hauk, O. (2014). Early parallel activation of semantics and phonology in picture naming: Evidence from a multiple linear regression MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 253343–253345. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munding, D., Dubarry, A. S., & Alario, F. X. (2016). On the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the MEG evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 441–462. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J. Y., & Chen, T. M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115, 282–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perret, C., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis. Brain and Language, 135, 20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perret, C., & Laganaro, M. (2012). Comparison of electrophysiological correlates of writing and speaking: A topographic ERP analysis. Brain Topography, 25, 64–72. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0200-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perret, C., & Laganaro, M. (2013). Why are written picture naming latencies (not) longer than spoken naming? Reading and Writing, 26, 225–239. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9365-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 14265–14270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200632109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., & Li, X. (2015). Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from a masked priming task. Language, Cognition & Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1091086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., Zhang, Q. F., & Zhu, X. B. (2011). Phonology contributes to writing: Evidence from written word production in a nonalphabetic script. Psychological Science, 22, 1107–1112. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q. Q., Zhang, Q. F., & Damian, M. F. (2016). Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming. Brain and Language, 159, 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 71–104. doi: 10.1080/026432997381628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scinto, L. F. (1986). Written language and psychological development. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X. R., Damian, M. F., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2013). Abstract graphemic representations support preparation of handwritten responses. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 69–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. C., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for names agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011, December). Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K, & Costa, A. (2016). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Present shortcomings and future avenues. Language, Cognition,and Neuroscience, 31(4), 484–503. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms. NeuroImage, 163, 206–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 912–928. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Costa, A. (2011). Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 345–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M.-J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitvie neuropsychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thierry, G., Cardebat, D., & Demonet, J. F. (2003). Electrophysiological comparison of grammatical processing and semantic processing of single spoken nouns. Brain Research, 17, 535–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Phonological codes constrain output of orthographic codes via sublexical and lexical routes in Chinese written production. PLoS One, 10(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. (2010). Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks. Memory & Cognition, 38, 519–528. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Wang, C. (2015, April). Phonology is not accessed earlier than orthography in Chinese written production: Evidence for the orthography autonomy hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Wang, C. (2016). The temporal courses of phonological and orthographic encoding in handwritten production in Chinese: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 417. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Weekes, B. S. (2009). Orthographic facilitation effects on spoken word production: Evidence from Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1082–1096. doi: 10.1080/01690960802042133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O. (2012). Orthographic and phonological facilitation in speech production: New evidence from picture naming in Chinese. Acta Psychologica, 139(2), 272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar