Planning for language production: the electrophysiological signature of attention to the cue to speak

References

• Acar, Z. A., & Makeig, S. (2013). Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization. Brain Topography, 26(3), 378–396. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0274-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). The timing of utterance planning in task-oriented dialogue: Evidence from a novel list-completion paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.32, Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Casillas, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Planning versus comprehension in turn-taking: Fast responders show reduced anticipatory processing of the question. Neuropsychologia, 109, 295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5, 12881. doi: 10.1038/srep12881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1197–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, 175, 77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker's turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515–535. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulitz, C., Hauk, O., & Cohen, R. (2000). Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(11), 2088–2097. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00441-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech & Language, 25(3), 601–634. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402. doi: 10.1038/nrn2113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical Update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Mazaheri, A. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Perret, C. (2011). Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topography, 24(1), 19–29. doi: 10.1007/s10548-010-0162-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S. K., Rohrbaugh, J. W., Adams, C. M., & Eckardt, M. J. (1993). Improving spatial and temporal resolution in evoked EEG responses using surface Laplacians. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 88(4), 309–322. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90055-T
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaheri, A., van Schouwenburg, M. R., Dimitrijevic, A., Denys, D., Cools, R., & Jensen, O. (2014). Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities. NeuroImage, 87, 356–362. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, P., Silberstein, R., Cadusch, P., Wijesinghe, R., Westdorp, A., & Srinivasan, R. (1994). A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90(1), 40–57. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90112-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). Fieldtrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, H. F. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11), 1842–1857. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., Dahlslätt, K., & Maris, E. (2015). Withholding planned speech is reflected in synchronized beta-band oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 549. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 253–279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from URL http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., & Draschkow, D. (2019). Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location. Psychophysiology, 56(6), e13335. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2016). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Present shortcomings and future avenues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 484–503. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Measures of spatial similarity and response magnitude in MEG and scalp EEG. Brain Topography, 20(3), 131–141. doi: 10.1007/s10548-007-0040-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 31–38. doi: 10.3758/BF03195818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar