Contextual speech rate influences morphosyntactic prediction and integration

References

• Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, K. S., Bullock-Rest, N., Rhone, A. E., Jongman, A., & McMurray, B. (2014). Contingent categorisation in speech perception. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1070–1082. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.824995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audacity Team. (2019). Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer application].
   Google Scholar
• Baese-Berk, M. M., Dilley, L. C., Henry, M. J., Vinke, L., & Banzina, E. (2019). Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(2), 571–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E, MacWhinney, B, &. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 157–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., & Shah, V. B. (2017). Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review, 59, 65–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5) [52]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bölte, J., & Connine, C. M. (2004). Grammatical gender in spoken word recognition in German. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(6), 1018–1032. doi: 10.3758/BF03194992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R. (2017a). Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 333–343. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1206-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R. (2017b). How our own speech rate influences our perception of others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1225–1238. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., & Ghitza, O. (2018). Entrained theta oscillations guide perception of subsequent speech: Behavioural evidence from rate normalisation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(8), 955–967. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1439179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., & Reinisch, E. (2017). Foreign languages sound fast: Evidence from implicit rate normalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., Reinisch, E., & Sjerps, M. J. (2017). Cognitive load makes speech sound fast, but does not modulate acoustic context effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Dilley, L. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2012). Real-time expectations based on context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 34, No. 34).
   Google Scholar
• Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (1994). Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science, 264(5163), 1333–1336. doi: 10.1126/science.8191289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012). Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1038/nrn3136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. J., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Lee, W. Y. (2018). Autoregressive generalized linear mixed effect models with crossed random effects: An application to intensive binary time series eye-tracking data. Psychometrika, 83(3), 751–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(03), 181–204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M., & Clifton, C. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2013). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilley, L. C., & Pitt, M. A. (2010). Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1664–1670. doi: 10.1177/0956797610384743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). Multipic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 808–816. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetsch, C. R., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013). Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(6), 429–442. doi: 10.1038/nrn3503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. A. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(4), 526–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(1), 110–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C. (1988). Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 43(2), 137–146. doi: 10.3758/BF03214191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerra, E., Nicenboim, B., & Helo, A. V. (2018). A crack in the crystal ball: Evidence against pre-activation of gender features in sentence comprehension. Poster presented at the AMLaP conference (Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing), Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Gwilliams, L., Linzen, T., Poeppel, D., & Marantz, A. (2018). In spoken word recognition, the future predicts the past. The Journal of Neuroscience, 38(35), 7585–7599. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-18.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner, C. C., Newman, R. S., Dilley, L. C., & Idsardi, W. J. (2015). Age-related differences in speech rate perception do not necessarily entail age-related differences in speech rate use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1341–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner, C. C., Newman, R. S., & Idsardi, W. J. (2017). Support for context effects on segmentation and segments depends on the context. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(3), 964–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillert, D., & Bates, E. (1996). Morphological constraints on lexical access: Gender priming in German. La Jolla: Center for Research in Language.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 37–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufeld, G., Ravenschlag, A., Meyer, A. S., Martin, A. E., & Bosker, H. R. (in press). Knowledge-based and signal-based cues are weighted flexibly during spoken language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochari, A. R., & Flecken, M. (2019). Lexical prediction in language comprehension: A replication study of grammatical gender effects in Dutch. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, M. S., Banks, M. S., & Knill, D. C. (2011). Ideal-observer models of Cue integration. In J. Trommershäuser, K. Kording, & M. S. Landy (Eds.), Sensory Cue integration (pp. 5–29). Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387247.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E. (2016). Language processing as Cue integration: Grounding the psychology of language in perception and neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., Monahan, P. J., & Samuel, A. G. (2017). Prediction of agreement and phonetic overlap shape sublexical identification. Language and Speech, 60(3), 356–376. doi: 10.1177/0023830916650714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowski, M., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2018). Listening to yourself is special: Evidence from global speech rate tracking. PLoS One, 13(9), e0203571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowski, M., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2019a). How the tracking of habitual rate influences speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowski, M., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2019b). Listeners normalize speech for contextual speech rate even without an explicit recognition task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5116004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. doi: 10.3758/BF03206780
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., Melhorn, J. F., & White, L. (2007). Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 960–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., Cole, J. S., & Munson, C. (2011). Features as an emergent product of computing perceptual cues relative to expectations. In Where do features come from (pp. 197–236).
   Google Scholar
• McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011). What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological Review, 118(2), 219–246. doi: 10.1037/a0022325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., & Baer, T. (1983). Some effects of speaking rate on the production of/b/and/w. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(5), 1751–1755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., & Dexter, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H. (2018). The singleton-geminate distinction can be rate dependent: Evidence from Maltese. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 9(1), 6. doi: 10.5334/labphon.66
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, T., Baese-Berk, M., Heffner, C., & Dilley, L. (2015). Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1451–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R. S., & Sawusch, J. R. (2009). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another. Journal of Phonetics, 37(1), 46–65. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85(3), 172–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. M., & Decker, L. R. (1960). Time factors in perception of a double consonant. Language and Speech, 3(1), 11–17. doi: 10.1177/002383096000300103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 699–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., Szostak, C., & Dilley, L. C. (2016). Rate dependent speech processing can be speech specific: Evidence from the perceptual disappearance of words under changes in context speech rate. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 334–345. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0981-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quene, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Rabagliati, H., & Bemis, D. K. (2013). Prediction is no panacea: The key to language is in the unexpected. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 372–373. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 978–996. doi: 10.1037/a0021923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch, E., & Sjerps, M. J. (2013). The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context. Journal of Phonetics, 41(2), 101–116. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, H., & Ettlinger, M. (2012). Integration of pragmatic and phonetic cues in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 967–983. doi: 10.1037/a0026786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., Praamstra, P., & Huettig, F. (2013). The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R., & Newman, R. S. (2000). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 285–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawusch, J. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1974). On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 181–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2012). Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0306-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2015). The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5), 529–543. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.946427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Alphen, P., & McQueen, J. M. (2001). The time-limited influence of sentential context on function word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1057–1071. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, T., & Holt, L. L. (2005). Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 939–950. doi: 10.3758/BF03193621
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Bates, E. A., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Potato not pope: Human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neuroscience Letters, 346(3), 165–168. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00599-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39(3), 483–508. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar