Next speakers plan word forms in overlap with the incoming turn: evidence from gaze-contingent switch task performance

References

• Alario, F., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(3), 741–764. doi:10.1080/713755907
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(328), 1–2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Meyer, A. S., & Levinson, S. C. (2017). Next speakers plan their turn early and speak after turn-final “go-signals”. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019). Speech planning at turn transitions in dialogue is associated with increased processing load. Cognitive Science, 43(7), e12768. doi:10.1111/cogs.12768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). The timing of utterance planning in task-oriented dialogue: Evidence from a novel list-completion paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1858). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01858
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using LME4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no …how the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. PloS One, 10(12), e0145474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5(12881), 1–11. doi:10.1038/srep12881
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P. C. (2017). BRMS : An R package for bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (pp. 229–253). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corps, R. E., Crossley, A., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2018). Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it. Cognition, 175, 77–95. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word associations: Norms for 1424 Dutch words in a continuous task. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 198–205. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.1.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove; Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fairs, A., Bögels, S., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing. Acta Psychologica, 191, 131–148. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2016). Neurophysiological modulations of non-verbal and verbal dual-tasks interference during word planning. PloS One, 11(12), e0168358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361–377. doi:10.3758/BF03193857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274–279. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halekoh, U., & Hojsgaard, S. (2014). A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – the R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1–2), 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, S. R., & Meyer, A. S. (2017). To plan or not to plan: Does planning for production remove facilitation from associative priming? Acta Psychologica, 181, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572, Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Herman, R. E., & Lian, C. H. T. (2003). The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: Talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 181–192. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983–997. doi:10.2307/2533558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaus, J., Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2017). Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: Effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 811–831. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1167926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 511–525. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.x
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. (2019). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R package].
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1–3), 1–22. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98(1), 122–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(731), 10–26. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1–36. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., & Butterfield, S. (2006). Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 146–193. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66(3), 180–194. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1995). Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(2), 291–321. doi:10.1080/01688639508405124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, A., & Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, L., Gonnerman, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (n.d.). Disambiguating the source of phonological inhibition effects in lexical decision: An MEG study (p. 27). Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Rajah, M. N., Languay, R., & Grady, C. L. (2011). Age-related changes in right middle frontal gyrus volume correlate with altered episodic retrieval activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(49), 17941–17954. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1690-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., Head, D., Williamson, A., …Acker, J. D. (2005). Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: General trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(11), 1676–1689. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 189–213. doi:10.1007/s10936-005-9011-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., …Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C., Singh, S., & Tattersall, C. (2016). Serial order in word form retrieval: New insights from the auditory picture-word interference task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 299–305. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0882-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar