Visuo-spatial construals that aid in understanding activity in visual-centred narrative

References

• Aarons, D., & Morgan, R. (2003). Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African sign language. Sign Language Studies, 3(2), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Adams, S. (1991–2017). Dilbert comic strips about Loud Howard. https://www.google.com/search?q=loud+howard+dilbert&rlz=1C1LENP_enUS508US508&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiug93ewJvUAhUE04MKHVkWD3sQ7AkINA&biw=1002&bih=542
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 81(2), 301–344. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahan, B. (2006). Face to face tradition in the American deaf Community. In H.-D. Bauman, J. Nelson, & H. Rose (Eds.), Signing the body poetic (pp. 21–50). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, H.-D. (2003). Redesigning literature: The cinematic poetics of American sign language poetry. Sign Language Studies, 4(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0021
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, H.-D., Nelson, J., & Rose, H. M. (Eds.). (2006). Signing the body poetic: Essays in American sign language literature. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(2), 163–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedicto, E., & Brentari, D. (2004). Where did all the arguments go? Argument changing properties of classifiers in American sign language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(4), 743–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Elorrieta, E., Kastner, I., Emmorey, K., & Pylkkänen, L. (2018). Shared neural correlates for building phrases in signed and spoken language. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 5492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23915-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2004). Neo-structuralist narratology and the functions of filmic storytelling. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.), Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling (pp. 203–219). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2013). Narration in the fiction film. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I. (2006). Grammatical processing in American sign language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(5), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500139363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, A. R., Guillemin, A., Hosey, L., & Varga, M. (2001). The neural organization of discourse: An H215O-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language. Brain, 124(10), 2028–2044. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.10.2028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan, M. (1990). Word formation in British Sign Language. University of Stockholm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brueggemann, B. J. (1999). Lend me your ear: Rhetorical constructions of deafness. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S. (1997). Deaf poets’ society: Subverting the hearing paradigm. Literature and Medicine, 16(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.1997.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1997). Do constraints on word meanings reflect prelinguistic cognitive architecture? Cognitive Studies, 4(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.4.1_35
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, S. B. (1980). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cienki, A., & Mittelberg, I. (2013). Creativity in the forms and functions of spontaneous gesture with speech. In T. Veale, K. Feyaerts, & C. Forceville (Eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon (pp. 231–252). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, Z., Pople, S., Hood, B., & Kita, S. (2014). Young children make their gestural communication systems more language-like: Segmentation and linearization of semantic elements in motion events. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1518–1525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogill-Koez, D. (2000a). Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language & Linguistics, 3(2), 153–207. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.2.03cog
   Google Scholar
• Cogill-Koez, D. (2000b). A model of signed language ‘classifier predicates’ as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics, 3(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.2.04cog
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, N. (2013). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, N. (2016). Sequential images are not universal, or Caveats for using visual narratives in experimental tasks. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2057–2062). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, N., & Ehly, S. (2016). The vocabulary of manga: Visual morphology in dialects of Japanese visual language. Journal of Pragmatics, 92(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G., Magee, D. R., Galata, A., Hogg, D. C., & Hazarika, S. M. (2003). Towards an architecture for cognitive vision using qualitative spatio-temporal representations and abduction. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning (pp. 232–248). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Petronio, K. (1998). What happens in tactile ASL? In C. Lucas (Ed.), Pinky extension & eye gaze: Language use in deaf communities (pp. 18–38). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, P. S. (2011). Features in American Sign Language storytelling. Storytelling, Self, Society, 7(1), 36–62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15505340.2011.535723
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, M. (2002). The emergence of grammatical categories in home sign: Evidence from family-based gesture systems in Nicaragua [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, M., & Senghas, A. (2010). Deixis in an emerging sign language. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey (pp. 543–569). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Sevcikova, Z. (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics, 18(2), 167–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuxac, C., & Sallandre, M.-A. (2007). Iconicity and arbitrariness in French sign language: High iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea, & R. Simone (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies (pp. 13–33). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. (2008). Concerto for the left hand: Disability and the defamiliar body. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Beuzeville, L. (2006). Visual and linguistic representation in the acquisition of depicting verbs: A study of native signing deaf children of Auslan (Australian sign language) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44461433/LdB_PhD.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1529482935&Signature=N6JDD7kKda34EbDdin1fbJKZF9Y%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DVisual_and_Linguistic_Representation_in.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Beuzeville, L., Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2009). The use of space with indicating verbs in Auslan: A corpus-based investigation. Sign Language & Linguistics, 12(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.12.1.03deb
   Google Scholar
• Denis, M., Logie, R. H., Cornoldi, C., de Vega, M., & Engelkamp, J. (Eds.). (2001). Imagery, language, and visuo-spatial thinking. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deuchar, M. (1984). British Sign Language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. (2010). Comic book visualities: A methodological manifesto on geography, montage and narration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobel, C., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Hummert, M., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2011). Conceptual representation of actions in sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(3), 392–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudis, P. (2004). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earis, H., & Cormier, K. (2013). Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: The example of “The tortoise and the hare”. Language and Cognition, 5(4), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, G. (1989). From sign to mime. TJ Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (2017). Sign-creation in the Seattle DeafBlind community: A triumphant story about the regeneration of obviousness. Gesture, 16(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.06edw
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, W. (2008). Graphic storytelling and visual narrative: Principles and practices from the legendary cartoonist. W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., & Falgier, B. (1999). Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 3–26). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013118114571
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Signum.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L. (2012). The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in Australian Sign Language (Auslan) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Macquarie University, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2013). Creative visual duality in comics balloons. In T. Veale, K. Feyaerts, & C. Forceville (Eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon (pp. 253–273). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Foulsham, T., Wybrow, D., & Cohn, N. (2016). Reading without words: Eye movements in the comprehension of comic strips. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, A. T., & Mayberry, R. I. (2016). Who's on first? Investigating the referential hierarchy in simple native ASL narratives. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale de Linguistique Generale, 180, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvan, D. (1989). A sensitive period for the acquisition of complex morphology: Evidence from American Sign Language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 28, 107–114. ED335892
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Kegl, J. A. (1983). Narrative/story structure, pausing, and American Sign Language. Discourse Processes, 6(3), 243–258. EJ294842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, D. (Ed.). (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gilinsky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58(6), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language. The Linguistic Review, 22(2–4), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). The impact of time on predicate forms in the manual modality: Signers, homesigners, and silent gesturers. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1990). Beyond the input given: The child's role in the acquisition of language. Language, 66(2), 323–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/414890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1961). Art and illusion. A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1963). Meditations on a hobby horse or the roots of artistic form. In E. H. Gombrich (Ed.), Mediations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art (pp. 1–11). Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L. (2008). Gestalt theory in interactive media design. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–12. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4719/da4f55d4a4633b7f81ca1eea5571c5364504.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2014). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, G. (2011). The semiotic spectrum [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers University at New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/36033/
   Google Scholar
• Hanfmann, G. (1957). Narration in Greek art. American Journal of Archeology, 61(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/501083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriman, G. (1919). Krazy Kat. Comic strip from 25 April 1919. http://www.comicstriplibrary.org/
   Google Scholar
• Herriman, G. (1921). Krazy Kat. Comic strip from 6 January 1921. http://www.comicstriplibrary.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hiraga, M. K. (1994). Diagrams and metaphors: Iconic aspects in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., & Ferrara, L. N. (2014). Showing the story: Enactment as performance in Auslan narratives. In L. Gawne, & J. Vaughan (Eds.), Selected papers from the 44th conference of the Australian linguistic Society (pp. 372–397). University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., Ferrara, L. N., & Anible, B. D. (2019). The semiotic diversity of doing reference in a deaf signed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoiting, N., & Slobin, D. I. (2007). From gestures to signs in the acquisition of sign language. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill [gesture studies 1] (pp. 51–65). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, R., Barnard, M., & Collomosse, J. (2010, September 26–29). Gradient field descriptor for sketch based retrieval and localization. 17th IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), Hong Kong: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, T. (2006). Visual communication: Signed language and cognition. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 359–378). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, T., Leeson, L., & Shaffer, B. (2012, 18 July). Understanding pronoun location choice in signed language discourse: Grammar, semantics and pragmatics [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of visual language Interpreters of Canada, Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Jarque, M. J., & Pascual, E. (2016). Mixed viewpoints in factual and fictive discourse in Catalan Sign Language narratives. In B. Dancygier, W.-I. Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 259–280). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2013). Formational and functional characteristics of pointing signs in a corpus of Auslan (Australian Sign Language): Are the data sufficient to posit a grammatical class of ‘pronouns’ in Auslan? Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 109–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, A. (2005). Two cameras and American Sign Language storytelling: Visual vernacular, video recording and the body [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kocab, A., Pyers, J., & Senghas, A. (2015). Referential shift in Nicaraguan Sign Language: A transition from lexical to spatial devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. P. K., & Poovaiah, R. (2011). Presence of universal elements across static visual narratives. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 5(3), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v05i03/38078
   Google Scholar
• Kunzle, D. (1973). History of the comic strip: The nineteenth century. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, J., & Woll, B. (1985). Sign language: The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1993). Universals of construal. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 19(1), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1532
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, L., & Saeed, J. I. (2012). Irish Sign Language: A cognitive linguistic account. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeson, L., Saeed, J. I., Shaffer, B., & Janzen, T. (2013, July 10–13). An embodied view of pragmatic inferencing in Signed Language discourse [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the Theoretical Issues in sign linguistics Conference (TISLR 12), University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de Carrasquel, S. R., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K. (2000a). Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In K. Emmorey, & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 303–320). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K. (2000b). Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 331–357). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K., & Metzger, M. (1998). Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(6), 657–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00061-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillo-Martin, D., & Meier, R. P. (2011). On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics, 37(3–4), 95–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., & Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 5(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, G., & Rathmann, C. (2010). Verb agreement in sign language morphology. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 173–196). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. A. (1996a). The Irish deaf community. Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann [the Linguistics Institute of Ireland].
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. A. (1996b). Extending the lexicon of Irish Sign Language. TEANGA: The Irish Yearbook of Applied Linguistics, 16, 135–167. ED414756
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, M. M. (1990). Visual-centered narratives of the deaf. Linguistics and Education, 2(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80020-8
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? Dial Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCay, W. (1905). Dream of the Rarebit Fiend. Comic strip. Retrieved April 26, 1905, from http://www.comicstriplibrary.org/images/comics/dream-of-the-rarebit-fiend/dream-of-the-rarebit-fiend-19050426-l.png
   Google Scholar
• McCay, W. (1906). Little Nemo in Slumberland. Comic strip. Retrieved March 4, 1906, from http://www.comicstriplibrary.org/display/149
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, P. (1996). Verb categories in Irish Sign Language. Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2008). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, R. P. (2002). The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status. In G. Morgan, & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 115–142). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, R. P. (2003). Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In R. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 1–25). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meir, I. (2012). The evolution of verb classes and verb agreement in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics, 38(1–2), 145–152. doi:10.1515/tl-2012-0008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. (1995). Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. W. (2002). Pretending and imagination in animals and children. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. E. (2014). The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P., & MacFarlane, J. (2003). Frequency characteristics of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1999). Event packaging in BSL discourse. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 27–58). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (2006). The development of narrative skills in British Sign Language. In B. Schick, M. Marschark, & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children (pp. 314–343). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mylander, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1991). Home sign systems in deaf children: The development of morphology without a conventional language model. In P. Siple, & S. D. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research (pp. 41–64). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, D. J. (2017). Iconicity chains in sign languages. In C. Bowern, L. Horn, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), On looking into words (and beyond) (pp. 517–546). Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, D. J., & Sutton-Spence, R. (2010). Limitations on simultaneity in sign language. Language, 86(3), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, D. J., Sutton-Spence, R., & Quadros, R. M. d. (2017). Influence of predicate sense on word order in sign languages: Intensional and extensional verbs. Language, 93(3), 641–670. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (1988). Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences, 10(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A-L. (2010). Studies in Swedish Sign Language: Reference, real space blending, and interpretation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stockholm University, Stockholm. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:305811/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nöth, W. (2001). Semiotic foundations of iconicity in language and literature. In O. Fischer, & M. Nänny (Eds.), The motivated sign (pp. 17–28). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Baoill, D., & Matthews, P. (2000). The Irish deaf community, the structure of ISL, Volume 2. Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann [the Linguistics Institute of Ireland].
   Google Scholar
• Occhino, C., Anible, B. D., Wilkinson, E., & Morford, J. P. (2017). Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder. Gesture, 16(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, A. (2015, November 24). “Flying Words”: A review of a performance by deaf poet Peter Cook, Boilerplate Magazine, Arts + Culture. http://boilerplatemagazine.com/?p=1725
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. Ed. Peirce Edition Project. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Vol. 2 (1893–1913). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. (2007). Space and iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS) [Doctoral dissertation]. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 45. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P., & Özyürek, A. (2008). Representations of action, motion, and location in sign space: A comparison of German (DGS) and Turkish (TİD) Sign Language narratives. In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 8 (pp. 353–378). Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (Eds.). (2007). Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children ( M. Cook Trans.). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pimenta, S., & Poovaiah, R. (2010, August). On defining visual narratives. Design Thoughts, 25–46. Bombay: School of Design, IIT.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzuto, E., & Volterra, V. (2000). Iconicity and transparency in sign language: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In K. Emmorey, & H. Lane (Eds.), Signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 261–286). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D., Emmorey, K., Hickok, G., & Pylkkänen, L. (2012). Towards a new neurobiology of language. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(41), 14125–14131. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3244-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puupponen, A. (2019). Towards understanding nonmanuality: A semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinto-Pozos, D. (2007). Why does constructed action seem obligatory? An analysis of classifiers and the lack of articulator-referent correspondence. Sign Language Studies, 7(4), 458–506. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0027
   Google Scholar
• Rayman, J. (1999). Storytelling in the visual mode: A comparison of ASL and English. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 59–82). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, H. M. (1995). Apprehending deaf culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365421
   Google Scholar
• Roy, C. B. (2012). Discourse in signed languages. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1914). Our knowledge of the external world. The Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, J., & Leeson, L. (2004). Windowing of attention in simultaneous constructions in Irish Sign Language (ISL). In T. Cameron, C. Shank, & K. Holley (Eds.), Fifth Annual high Desert linguistics Society Conference (pp. 1–17). High Desert Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, A. (2001). Issues in the analysis of polycomponential verbs in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, A. (2003). Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 3–34). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and non-signers’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, B. S. (1990). Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1(1), 15–40. ID (NAID) 10025462623
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, P., & Lamberton, J. (2012). Formal indices and iconicity in ASL. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Weidman Sassoon, K. Schultz, & M. Westera (Eds.), Logic, language and meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 1–11). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, A. I. (1973). Recognition memory and the recall of spatial location. Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senghas, A. (2011). The emergence of two functions for spatial devices in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Human Development, 53(5), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. G., & Stockman, G. C. (2001). Computer vision. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7(5), 301–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siple, L. A. (1994). Cultural patterns of deaf people. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (2012). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Anniversary Session: Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 20(1), 487–505. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a67/4a24347e8f0709abf0083ff9b89fa5eb9e99.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Cormier, K. (2014). In or out?: Spatial scale and enactment in narratives of native and nonnative signing deaf children acquiring British Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 14(3), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2014.0008
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, T. (2006). Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in shape descriptions. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory. In S. Carey, & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 133–169). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S. (2010). Core systems and the growth of human knowledge: Natural geometry. Human Neuroplasticity and Education, 27, 73–99. http://www.xn--academiadascincias-6wb.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv117/sv117.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spelke, E. S., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the development of knowledge. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 275–340). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strehlow, C. (1978). The sign language of the Aranda. [an extract from 1915: C. C. Chewings (translator), Die Aranda-und-Loritja-Stamme in Zentral-Australien, Frankfurt: Baer]. Reprinted (1978). In D. J. Umiker-Sebeok, & T. A. Sebeok (Eds.), Aboriginal sign languages of the Americas and Australia, Vol II (pp. 349–370). Plenum Press (Original work published 1915).
   Google Scholar
• Struiksma, M. E., Noordzij, M. L., & Postma, A. (2009). What is the link between language and spatial images? Behavioral and neural findings in blind and sighted individuals. Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in ASL [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Supalla, T. (2003). Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 249–257). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R. (2011). Sign language narratives for deaf children –identity, culture and language. Journal of Folklore Research, 47(3), 265–305. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.2010.47.3.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Kaneko, M. (2016). Introducing sign language literature: Folklore and creativity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Napoli, D. J. (2010). Anthropomorphism in sign languages: A look at poetry and storytelling with a focus on British Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 10(4), 442–475. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0055
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Napoli, D. J. (2013). How much can classifiers be analogous to their referents? Gesture, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.1.01sut
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & West, D. (2010, July 6). Personification in creative sign language. Cognitive linguistics Conference 3University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5g15p348
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language. Vol. 4, Syntax (pp. 625–649). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–205). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G. (2003). Verbs of motion and location in Hong Kong Sign Language: Conflation and lexicalization. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 143–166). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L. (2006). Eye gaze in American Sign Language: Linguistic functions for verbs and pronouns [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/12r3h13m
   Google Scholar
• Thumann, M. (2011). Identifying depiction constructed action and constructed dialogue. In A. S. L. presentations, & I. C. B. Roy (Eds.), Discourse in signed languages (pp. 46–64). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valli, C. (1993). Poetics of American Sign Language poetry [Doctoral dissertation]. The Union Institute Graduate School, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• van Hoek, K. (1992). Conceptual spaces and pronominal reference in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500002596
   Google Scholar
• Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeerbergen, M., & Leeson, L. (2011). European signed languages–towards a typological snapshot. In B. Kortmann, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide (pp. 269–287). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. A. (2007). Simultaneity in signed languages. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. B. (2003). Representations of telicity in ASL. Proceedings From the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 39(1), 354–368. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cls/pcls/2003/00000039/00000001/art00023
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. B. (2008). Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004 (pp. 217–250). Signum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. B. (2010). The semantics-phonology interface. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 357–382). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, P. P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S. (2004). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 119–148. 0936–5907/04/0015–0119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Morford, J. P. (2007). Empirical methods in sign language research. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 171–200). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. P. (2016). Alternative representations of space: Arrernte narratives in sand. In M. Biemans, & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLS opening Academic Year ‘97 –’98 (pp. 133–164). Nijmegen: Nijmegen/Tilburg Center for Language Studies. Reprinted in 2016 in N. Cohn (Ed.), The visual narrative reader (pp. 253–282). London: Bloomsbury (Original work published 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Woll, B. (2003). Modality, universality and the similarities among sign languages: An historical perspective. In A. Baker, B. van den Bogaerde, & O. Crasborn (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives in sign language research; selected papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 17–31). Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. (2007). Degrees of resiliency in acquisition of language. Nanzan Linguistics, 3(1), 315–330. https://www.ic.nanzan-u.ac.jp/LINGUISTICS/publication/pdf/NLSI3_1-12-wood.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2007). How iconic gestures enhance communication: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 101(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–245). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar