Analysis of continuous neuronal activity evoked by natural speech with computational corpus linguistics methods

References

• Alday, P. M. (2019). How much baseline correction do we need in ERP research? Extended GLM model can replace baseline correction while lifting its limits. Psychophysiology, 56(12), e13451. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.v56.12 doi: 10.1111/psyp.13451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila-Meléndez, M. E., Kranen-Mastenbroek, V. H., Valente, G., Correia, J., Gommer, E. D., Jansma, B. M., Rouhl, R. P., & Roberts, M. J. (2018). S09. The role of oscillatory activity in attentive speech perception: An Ecog study in epilepsy patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 129, e145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnaud, L., Sato, M., Ménard, L., & Gracco, V. L. (2013). Repetition suppression for speech processing in the associative occipital and parietal cortex of congenitally blind adults. PLoS One, 8(5), e64553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston, G., & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC handbook: Exploring the British national corpus with SARA. Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, L., Cornelissen, P., Simpson, M., Urooj, U., Woods, W., & Ellis, A. W. (2011). The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: An MEG analysis using virtual electrodes. Brain and Language, 118(3), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)59012-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 69–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational english. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2002). ‘Little words’ – not really: Function and content words in normal and aphasic speech. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15(3-5), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(01)00031-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Denker, J. S., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Jackel, L. D., LeCun, Y., Muller, U. A., Sackinger, E., Simard, P., & Vapnik, V. (1994). Comparison of classifier methods: A case study in handwritten digit recognition. Proceedings of the 12th IAPR international conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 3-conference C: Signal Processing (Cat. No. 94CH3440-5) (Vol. 2, pp. 77–82). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. R., & Pylkkänen, L. (2012). The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing. Neuroimage, 60(2), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. R., & Pylkkänen, L. (2017). Meg evidence for incremental sentence composition in the anterior temporal lobe. Cognitive Science, 41, 1515–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.2017.41.issue-S6 doi: 10.1111/cogs.12445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, C., Presacco, A., & Simon, J. Z. (2018). Neural source dynamics of brain responses to continuous stimuli: Speech processing from acoustics to comprehension. NeuroImage, 172, 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick, M. P., Anderson, A. J., Di Liberto, G. M., Crosse, M. J., & Lalor, E. C. (2018). Electrophysiological correlates of semantic dissimilarity reflect the comprehension of natural, narrative speech. Current Biology, 28(5), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M. G., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, P. L., Kringelbach, M. L., Ellis, A. W., Whitney, C., Holliday, I. E., & P. C. Hansen (2009). Activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in the first 200 ms of reading: Evidence from magnetoencephalography (MEG). PloS One, 4(4), e5359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. A., & Cox, T. F. (2008). Multidimensional scaling. In C.-h. Chen, W. Härdle, & A. Unwin (Eds.), Handbook of data visualization (pp. 315–347). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Craddock, M., Martinovic, J., & Müller, M. M. (2015). Early and late effects of objecthood and spatial frequency on event-related potentials and gamma band activity. BMC Neuroscience, 16(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0144-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalal, S. S., Baillet, S., Adam, C., Ducorps, A., Schwartz, D., Jerbi, K., Bertrand, O., Garnero, L., Martinerie, J., & Lachaux, J. -P. (2009). Simultaneous MEG and intracranial EEG recordings during attentive reading. Neuroimage, 45(4), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 4957–4960. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.11.4957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2010). The corpus of contemporary american english as the first reliable monitor corpus of english. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq018
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M., & Hagoort, P. (2017). Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (Vol. 9). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, F., A. O. Nunez-Elizalde, Huth, A. G., & Gallant, J. L. (2019). The representation of semantic information across human cerebral cortex during listening versus reading is invariant to stimulus modality. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(39), 7722–7736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, M. T., & McCarthy, G. (2009). A comparison of brain activity evoked by single content and function words: An FMRI investigation of implicit word processing. Brain Research, 1282, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012). Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00297.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. C., Janke, A. L., Collins, D. L., & Baillet, S. (2012). Brain templates and atlases. Neuroimage, 62(2), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evert, S. (2005). The statistics of word cooccurrences: Word pairs and collocations [PhD thesis]. University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Evert, S., Uhrig, P., Bartsch, S., & Proisl, T. (2017). E-VIEW-alation – a large-scale evaluation study of association measures for collocation identification. In I. Kosem, C. Tiberius, M. Jakubíçek, J. Kallas, S. Krek, & V. Baisa (Eds.), Proceedings of the eLex 2017 conference on Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century (pp. 531–549). Lexical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Explosion, A. (2017). spacy-industrial-strength natural language processing in python. https://spacy.io.
   Google Scholar
• Files, B. (2011). An introduction to EEG. Perception.
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I. D., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1709–1717. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & S. M. Gierhan (2013). The language network. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(93)90026-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M., Kastner, J., Wagner, M., Hawes, S., & Ebersole, J. S. (2002). A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00030-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerum, R. C., Erpenbeck, A., Krauss, P., & Schilling, A. (2020). Sparsity through evolutionary pruning prevents neuronal networks from overfitting. Neural Networks, 128, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhahn, D., Eckart, T., & Quasthoff, U. (2012). Building large monolingual dictionaries at the leipzig corpora collection: From 100 to 200 languages. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12), Istanbul, Turkey (Vol. 29, pp. 31–43).
   Google Scholar
• Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., Goj, R., Jas, M., Brooks, T., Parkkonen, L., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., Parkkonen, L., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2014). MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage, 86, 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2001). FMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107(1–3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00019-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). Erp effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1518–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00052-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993). Magnetoencephalography – theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65(2), 413. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., & Huth, A. G. (2020). The revolution will not be controlled: Natural stimuli in speech neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(5), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1499946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, T. C. (2005). Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of erp data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. N. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(03)00086-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, T. (2011). The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 59(4), 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, T. (2014). The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions–collocations–patterns (pp. 167–216). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, T., & Schüller, S. (2008). Introduction to syntactic analysis: A valency approach. Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Højlund, A., Gebauer, L., McGregor, W. B., & Wallentin, M. (2019). Context and perceptual asymmetry effects on the mismatch negativity (MMNM) to speech sounds: An MEG study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1572204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, A. G., De Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide, N., & Suderman, K. (2004). The American national corpus first release. Proceedings of the Fourth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Lisbon (pp. 1681–1684).
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2014). Speech and language processing (Vol. 3). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01947-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsamanis, A., Black, M., Georgiou, P. G., Goldstein, L., & Narayanan, S. (2011, January 28–31). Sailalign: Robust long speech-text alignment. Proceedings of the workshop on New Tools and Methods for Very Large Scale Research in Phonetic Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D. (2014). Cognitive neuroscience of language. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L. (1998). Harking: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keurs, M. t., Brown, C., Hagoort, P., Praamstra, P., & Stegeman, D. (1995). ERP characteristics of function and content words in Broca's aphasics with agrammatic comprehension.
   Google Scholar
• Kisler, T., Reichel, U., & Schiel, F. (2017). Multilingual processing of speech via web services. Computer Speech & Language, 45, 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, M., & Seppä, M. (2014). Uncovering cortical MEG responses to listened audiobook stories. Neuroimage, 100, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Joshi, N., Schulze, H., Traxdorf, M., Maier, A., & Schilling, A. (2020). Analysis and visualization of sleep stages based on deep neural networks. bioRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Schilling, A., Schütz, C., Tziridis, K., Fabry, B., & Schulze, H. (2017). Adaptive stochastic resonance for unknown and variable input signals. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Schilling, A., Tziridis, K., Traxdorf, M., Wollbrink, A., Rampp, S., Pantev, C., & Schulze, H. (2018). A statistical method for analyzing and comparing spatiotemporal cortical activation patterns. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17765-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krauss, P., Prebeck, K., Schilling, A., & Metzner, C. (2019). Recurrence resonance in three-neuron motifs. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 13, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2019.00064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Schilling, A., Bauer, J., Tziridis, K., Metzner, C., Schulze, H., & Traxdorf, M. (2018). Analysis of multichannel EEG patterns during human sleep: A novel approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Schuster, M., Dietrich, V., Schilling, A., Schulze, H., & Metzner, C. (2019). Weight statistics controls dynamics in recurrent neural networks. PloS One, 14(4), e0214541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Tziridis, K., Metzner, C., Schilling, A., Hoppe, U., & Schulze, H. (2016). Stochastic resonance controlled upregulation of internal noise after hearing loss as a putative cause of tinnitus-related neuronal hyperactivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Tziridis, K., Schilling, A., & Schulze, H. (2018). Cross-modal stochastic resonance as a universal principle to enhance sensory processing. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, P., Zankl, A., Schilling, A., Schulze, H., & Metzner, C. (2019). Analysis of structure and dynamics in three-neuron motifs. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2019.00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegeskorte, N., & Douglas, P. K. (2018). Cognitive computational neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 21(9), 1148–1160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0210-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. (1978). Multidimensional scaling (Vol. 11). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the n400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V. T., Howerton, O., & Desai, R. H. (2019). Concrete processing of action metaphors: Evidence from ERP. Brain Research, 1714, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2019.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Salmelin, R., Helenius, P., & Marttila, R. (2000). Brain activation during reading in deep dyslexia: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). The n400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-2 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E., Almeida, D., Hines, P. C., & Poeppel, D. (2009). A lexical basis for n400 context effects: Evidence from MEG. Brain and Language, 111(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, G. (2014). The state of the art in corpus linguistics. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 20–41). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG-and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Màrquez, L., & Rodríguez, H. (1998). Part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In European conference on machine learning (pp. 25–36). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, U., & Gruber, T. (2012). Sharpening and formation: Two distinct neuronal mechanisms of repetition priming. European Journal of Neuroscience, 36(7), 2989–2995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08222.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrhauser, L., Bergmann, J., Crone, J., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Neural repetition suppression: Evidence for perceptual expectation in object-selective regions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, P., Pinker, S., M. A. Nowak, & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science, 331(6014), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millett, D. (2001). Hans berger: From psychic energy to the EEG. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44(4), 522–542. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2001.0070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90073-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, P. J., Joerg, C., Thong, J. -M. V., & Glickman, O. (1998). A recursive algorithm for the forced alignment of very long audio segments. Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, R. L., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Sensorimotor semantics on the spot: Brain activity dissociates between conceptual categories within 150 ms. Scientific Reports, 3, 1928. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, N., & Weisz, N. (2012). Lateralized auditory cortical alpha band activity and interregional connectivity pattern reflect anticipation of target sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1604–1613. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., N. P. Du Sert, Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E. -J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortmann, K., Roussel, A., & Dipper, S. (2019). Evaluating off-the-shelf NLP tools for German. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Özçalışkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Sex differences in language first appear in gesture. Developmental Science, 13(5), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.2010.13.issue-5 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00933.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy – psychophysics software in python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using psychopy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller, G., & Da Silva, F. L. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11), 1842–1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preissl, H., Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs. Neuroscience Letters, 197(1), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(95)11892-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proverbio, A. M., Calbi, M., Manfredi, M., & Zani, A. (2014). Comprehending body language and mimics: An ERP and neuroimaging study on italian actors and viewers. PLoS One, 9(3https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F. (2003). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94(5), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00291-R
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Preissl, H. (1999). Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: Evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses. Cerebral Cortex, 9(5), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/9.5.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Preißl, H., Eulitz, C., Pantev, C., Lutzenberger, W., Feige, B., Elbert, T., & Birbaumer, N. (1994). Gamma-band responses reflect word/pseudoword processing. In Oscillatory event-related brain dynamics (pp. 243–258). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Preissl, H., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1996). Brain rhythms of language: Nouns versus verbs. European Journal of Neuroscience, 8(5), 937–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.1996.8.issue-5 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2008). Spatiotemporal signatures of large-scale synfire chains for speech processing as revealed by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 19(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language, 110(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnaparkhi, A. (1996). A maximum entropy model for part-of-speech tagging. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F. (2012). Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. C. C. Chair, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eight international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'12) (pp. 486–493). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   Google Scholar
• Schiel, F. (1999). Automatic phonetic transcription of non-prompted speech. Proceedings of the ICPhS, San Francisco, CA (pp. 607–610).
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, A., Gerum, R. C., Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Tziridis, K., & Schulze, H. (2019). Objective estimation of sensory thresholds based on neurophysiological parameters. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, A., Gerum, R., Zankl, A., Schulze, H., Metzner, C., & Krauss, P. (2020). Intrinsic noise improves speech recognition in a computational model of the auditory pathway. bioRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, A., Metzner, C., Rietsch, J., Gerum, R., Schulze, H., & Krauss, P. (2018). How deep is deep enough? – quantifying class separability in the hidden layers of deep neural networks. Preprint. arXiv:1811.01753.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, A., Tziridis, K., Schulze, H., & Krauss, P. (2020). The stochastic resonance model of auditory perception: A unified explanation of tinnitus development, zwicker tone illusion, and residual inhibition. bioRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Snoek, G. L., Drew, A. R., Barile, E. C., & Agauas, S. J. (2015). Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Weber, K., de Lange, F. P., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2013). The suppression of repetition enhancement: A review of FMRI studies. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early MEG activation dynamics in the left temporal and inferior frontal cortex reflect semantic context integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(10), 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014). Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), E4687–E4696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323812111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text. In Trust the text (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Souter, C., & Atwell, E. (1993). Corpus-based computational linguistics Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer, M., Kischka, U., Gückel, F., Bellemann, M. E., Kammer, T., Seyyedi, S., Weisbrod, M., Schwartz, A., & Brix, G. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of category-specific cortical activation: Evidence for semantic maps. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00020-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauß, A., Kotz, S. A., & Obleser, J. (2013). Narrowed expectancies under degraded speech: Revisiting the n400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, C., Trittschuh, E. H., J. M. Monti, Mesulam, M.-M., & Egner, T. (2008). Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, R., Kim, C., Dreyer, F. R., Grisoni, L., & Pulvermüller, F. (2019). Neurophysiological evidence for rapid processing of verbal and gestural information in understanding communicative actions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torgerson, W. S. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika, 17(4), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288916
   Google Scholar
• Trinkle, D. A., Auchter, D., Merriman, S. A., & Larson, T. E. (2016). The history highway: A 21st-century guide to internet resources. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsigka, S., Papadelis, C., Braun, C., & Miceli, G. (2014). Distinguishable neural correlates of verbs and nouns: A MEG study on homonyms. Neuropsychologia, 54, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhrig, P. (2018). I don't want to go all yoko ono on you – creativity and variation in a family of constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 66(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhrig, P. (2020). Creative intentions: The thin line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. Cognitive Semiotics, 13(1). doi: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2027
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PloS One, 9(11), e112575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz, N., Hartmann, T., Müller, N., & Obleser, J. (2011). Alpha rhythms in audition: Cognitive and clinical perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2031–2046. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., & Liberman, M. (2009). Investigating/l/variation in English through forced alignment. Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar