References
- Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802
- Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000123
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
- Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Behrens, H. (1998). How difficult are complex verbs? Evidence from German, Dutch and English. Linguistics, 36(4), 679–712. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.4.679
- Blom, C. (2005). Complex predicates in Dutch: Synchrony and diachrony. LOT.
- Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017). Enriching word vectors with subword information. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00051
- Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. (2005). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in Eye Guidance (pp. 53–77). Oxford University Press.
- Ciaccio, L. A., Kgolo, N., & Clahsen, H. (2020). Morphological decomposition in Bantu: A masked priming study on Setswana prefixation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1722847
- Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D. (2020). Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055
- Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895
- Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954
- Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
- Felfe, M. (2012). Das system der Partikelverben mit “an “: Eine konstruktionsgrammatische Untersuchung. Walter de Gruyter.
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression, third edition. Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
- Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841
- Geyken, A. (2007). The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. In C. Fellbaum (Ed.), Collocations and Idioms: Linguistic, lexicographic, and computational aspects (pp. 23–41). London: Continuum Press.
- Grainger, J. (2003). Moving eyes and reading words: How can a computational model combine the two? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 457–470). Elsevier.
- Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in research and theory, 67 (pp. 285–317). Elsevier Academic Press. [Chapter Nine].
- Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
- Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalised linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
- Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
- Hyönä, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers’ attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.68
- Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S. (2018). Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1267233
- Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B. M., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 803–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000639
- Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208203
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.
- Juhasz, B. J., & Pollatsek, A. (2011). Lexical influences on eye movements in reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 873–893). Oxford University Press.
- Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1560–1579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012319
- Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.658820
- Kwantes, P. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1999). Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.376
- Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55–75). Elsevier Science Ltd.
- Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960244000036
- Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2011). Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: Production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 65(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023794
- McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28(10), 1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-X
- McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208086
- McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2004). The potential contribution of preplanned refixations to the preferred viewing location. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(6), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194993
- Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2017). Discrimination in lexical decision. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171935
- Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2010). SLRT-II: Lese- und Rechtschreibtest: Weiterentwicklung des Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtests (SLRT). Huber.
- Mousikou, P., & Schroeder, S. (2019). Morphological processing in single-word and sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 881–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000619
- Murray, W. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (1994). Referential context effects on syntactic processing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 359–388). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Olsen, S. (1996). Partikelverben im Deutsch-Englischen Vergleich [Particle verbs in a comparison of German and English]. In E. Lang & G. Zifonum (Eds.), Deutsch–typologisch (pp. 261–288). De Gruyter.
- Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02
- Raney, G. E., & Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 49(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.49.2.151
- Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
- Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
- Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
- Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty Fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
- Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0
- Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
- Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 751–766). Oxford University Press.
- Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 16(8), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(76)90143-7
- Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The Psychology of reading. Prentice Hall.
- Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: Comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1188–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
- Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555
- R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/
- Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
- Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199
- Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1793–1820. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000411
- Schreuder, R., Grendel, M., Poulisse, N., Roelofs, A., & van de Voort, M. (1990). Lexical processing, morphological complexity and reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 125–141). Erlbaum.
- Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roelofs, A. (1991). The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90009-9
- Slattery, T. J., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movements and display change detection during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1924–1938. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024322
- Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F. (2009). When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802075497
- Smolka, E., Libben, G., & Dressler, W. U. (2019). When morphological structure overrides meaning: Evidence from German prefix and particle verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1552006
- Smolka, E., Preller, K., & Eulitz, C. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
- Springorum, S., Schulte im Walde, S., & Roßdeutscher, A. (2013). Sentence Generation and Compositionality of Systematic Neologisms of German particle verbs. Talk at the 5th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, 12-14 September 2013.
- SR Research Experiment Builder Version 1.10.165. (2011). [Computer software]. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: SR Research Ltd.
- Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
- Twain, M. (1880). The awful German language. BVK.
- Vergilino, D., & Beauvillain, C. (2000). The planning of refixation saccades in reading. Vision Research, 40(25), 3527–3538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00192-9
- Weiß, R. H. (2006). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 (CFT 20-R) mit Wortschatztest (WS) und Zahlenfolgentest (ZF) [Basic test of intelligence scale 2 (CFT 20-R) with vocabulary test (WS) and digit sequence test (ZF)]. Hogrefe.
- White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193789
- Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132(2), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.008
- Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971