“Entraining” to speech, generating language?

References

• Alderson-Day, B., Lima, C. F., Evans, S., Krishnan, S., Shanmugalingam, P., Fernyhough, C., & Scott, S. K. (2017). Distinct processing of ambiguous speech in people with non-clinical auditory verbal hallucinations. Brain, 140(9), 2475–2489. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnal, L. H., Doelling, K. B., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Delta-beta coupled oscillations underlie temporal prediction accuracy. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 3077–3085. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arns, M. M., Peters, S., Breteler, R., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Different brain activation patterns in dyslexic children: Evidence from EEG power and coherence patterns for the double-deficit theory of dyslexia. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 6(01), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635207001404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2019). Toward a neurobiologically plausible model of language-related, negative event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(FEB), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bosker, H. R. (2017). Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1206-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, V. J., Gilbert, A. C., & Jemel, B. (2018). The role of low-frequency neural oscillations in speech processing: Revisiting delta entrainment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(8), 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, M., Baart, M., Kapnoula, E. C., & Molinaro, N. (2020). Lip-reading enables the brain to synthesize auditory features of unknown silent speech. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(5), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1101-19.2019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, M., De Tiege, X., de Beeck, M. O., Ligot, N., Paquier, P., Van Bogaert, P., Goldman, S., Hari, R., & Jousmäki, V. (2013). The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener’s cortex to the reader’s voice. Human Brain Mapping, 34(2), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, M., Molinaro, N., Lizarazu, M., Taulu, S., Jousmäki, V., Lallier, M., Carreiras, M., & De Tiège, X. (2020). Neocortical activity tracks the hierarchical linguistic structures of self-produced speech during reading aloud. NeuroImage, 216(March), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan, J. R., & Martin, A. E. (2020). Phase synchronization varies systematically with linguistic structure composition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0305
   Google Scholar
• Breska, A., & Deouell, L. Y. (2017). Neural mechanisms of rhythm-based temporal prediction: Delta phase-locking reflects temporal predictability but not rhythmic entrainment. PLoS Biology, 15(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215808416249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015). A hierarchical generative framework of language processing: Linking language perception, interpretation, and production abnormalities in schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00643
   Google Scholar
• Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the brain. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzsáki, G. (2019). The Brain from inside out. The Brain from Inside Out. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190905385.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2015). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan, G. B., & Poeppel, D. (2011). A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(2), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00075.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowles, H. W., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M. (2007). Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 102(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2012). Oscillators and syllables: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(OCT), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daube, C., Ince, R. A. A., & Gross, J. (2019). Simple acoustic features can explain phoneme-based predictions of cortical responses to speech. Current Biology, 29(12), 1924–1937.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Liberto, G. M., O’Sullivan, J. A., & Lalor, E. C. (2015). Low-frequency cortical entrainment to speech reflects phoneme-level processing. Current Biology, 25(19), 2457–2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Patel, A. D., Chen, L., Butler, H., Luo, C., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Temporal modulations in speech and music. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2014). Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: Functional roles and interpretations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donhauser, P. W., & Baillet, S. (2019). Two distinct neural timescales for predictive speech processing. Neuron, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J. E., Baum, S. R., Valeriote, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2016). Punctuation and implicit prosody in silent reading: An ERP study investigating English garden-path sentences. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, SEP. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, H., & Chang, F. (2018). Sentence-level ERP effects as error propagation: A neurocomputational model. Cognitive Psychology, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/FRX2W
   Google Scholar
• Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 140, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Basilakos, A., Hickok, G., Bonilha, L., & Rorden, C. (2015). Speech entrainment compensates for Broca’s Area Damage. Cortex, 69(5), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Hubbard, H. I., Hudspeth, S. G., Holland, A. L., Bonilha, L., Fromm, D., & Rorden, C. (2012). Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech. Brain, 135(12), 3815–3829. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghitza, O. (2020). “Acoustic-driven oscillators as cortical pacemaker”: a commentary on Meyer, Sun & Martin (2019). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 0(0), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1737720
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. C., Boucher, V. J., & Jemel, B. (2015). The perceptual chunking of speech: A demonstration using ERPs. Brain Research, 1603, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A.-L. (2020). Oscillations for all A commentary on Meyer, Sun & Martin (2020). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1764990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A., Kleinschmidt, A., Poeppel, D., Lund, T. E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Laufs, H. (2007). Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron, 56(6), 1127–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Leong, V. (2013). Speech rhythm and temporal structure: Converging perspectives? Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2013-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biology, 11(12), e1001752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwilliams, L. (2020). Hierarchical oscillators in speech comprehension: A commentary on Meyer, Sun, and Martin (2019). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1740749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegens, S. (2020). Entrainment revisited: A commentary on Meyer, Sun, and Martin (2020). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1758335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegens, S., & Zion-Golumbic, E. M. (2018). Rhythmic facilitation of sensory processing: A critical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 86, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, G., Ponce-Alvarez, A., Deco, G., Aertsen, A., & Kumar, A. (2019). Portraits of communication in neuronal networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0094-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. T., Dyer, C., Kuncoro, A., & Brennan, J. R. (2018). Finding Syntax in Human Encephalography with Beam Search. ACL, 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p18-1254
   Google Scholar
• Halle, M., & Stevens, K. (1962). Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 8(2), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1962.1057686
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, J. A., Rupp, A., Soltész, F., Szücs, D., & Goswami, U. (2012). Reduced phase locking to slow amplitude modulation in adults with dyslexia: An MEG study. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2952–2961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D. J., & Rubin, N. (2008). A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(10), 2539–2550. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(49), 20095–20100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213390109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., Farahbod, H., & Saberi, K. (2015). The rhythm of perception entrainment to acoustic rhythms induces subsequent perceptual oscillation. Psychological Science, 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615576533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzgrefe, J., Wellmann, C., Petrone, C., Truckenbrodt, H., Höhle, B., & Wartenburger, I. (2013). Brain response to prosodic boundary cues depends on boundary position. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(JUL), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyafil, A., Giraud, A.-L., Fontolan, L., Gutkin, B., & Hya, A. (2015). Neural cross-frequency coupling: connecting architectures, mechanisms, and functions. Trends in Neurosciences, 38(11), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochaut, D., Lehongre, K., Saitovitch, A., Devauchelle, A. D., Olasagasti, I., Chabane, N., Zilbovicius, M., & Giraud, A. L. (2015). Atypical coordination of cortical oscillations in response to speech in autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(March), 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joliot, M., Ribary, U., & Llinás, R. (1994). Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11748
   Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321107855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandylaki, K. D., & Kotz, S. A. (2020). Distinct cortical rhythms in speech and language processing and some more: A commentary on Meyer, Sun, & Martin (2019). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1757729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufeld, G., Bosker, H. R., Alday, P. M., Meyer, A. S., & Martin, A. E. (2020). Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy. BioRxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, S. J., Ince, R. A. A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2015). Irregular speech rate dissociates auditory cortical entrainment, evoked responses, and frontal alpha. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(44), 14691–14701. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2243-15.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, A., & Gross, J. (2016). Individual human brain areas can be identified from their characteristic spectral activation fingerprints. PLoS Biology, 14(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher, T., Bröhl, H., Meier, F., & Engelen, J. (2018). Formal thought disorders: From phenomenology to neurobiology. The Lancet Psychiatry, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30059-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., Hanslmayr, S., Gruber, W. R., & Freunberger, R. (2007). Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 31(7), 1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimovich-Gray, A., & Molinaro, N. (2020). Synchronising internal and external information: A commentary on Meyer, Sun & Martin (2020). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1743875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösem, A., Bosker, H. R., Takashima, A., Meyer, A. S., Jensen, O., & Hagoort, P. (2018). Neural entrainment determines the words we hear. Current Biology, 28(18), 2867–2875.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2014). The missing link in the embodiment of syntax: Prosody. Brain and Language, 137, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Brothers, T., & Wlotko, E. W. (2019). A tale of two positivities and the N400: Distinct neural signatures Are evoked by confirmed and violated predictions at different levels of representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019). A new unifying account of the roles of neuronal entrainment. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science, 320(5872), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, P., Schroeder, C. E., Leitman, D. I., & Javitt, D. C. (2013). Predictive suppression of cortical excitability and its deficit in schizophrenia. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(28), 11692–11702. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0010-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehongre, K., Ramus, F., Villiermet, N., Schwartz, D., & Giraud, A.-L. (2011). Altered low-gamma sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron, 72(6), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011). Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(8), 2906–2915. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G. (2020). Balancing exogenous and endogenous cortical rhythms for speech and language requires a lot of entraining: a commentary on Meyer, Sun & Martin (2020). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1734640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. G., & Bastiaansen, M. C. M. (2015). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex, 68, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4736938.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Liu, Z., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biology, 8(8), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron, 54(6), 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, G., Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2016). Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing. NeuroImage, 133, 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E. (2016). Language processing as Cue integration: Grounding the psychology of language in perception and neurophysiology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E. (2020). A compositional neural architecture for language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., & Doumas, L. A. A. (2017). A mechanism for the cortical computation of hierarchical linguistic structure. PLoS Biology, 15(3), e2000663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory ( Vol. 46, pp. 155–200). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(06)46005-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Elsner, A., Turker, S., Kuhnke, P., & Hartwigsen, G. (2018). Perturbation of left posterior prefrontal cortex modulates top-down processing in sentence comprehension. Neuroimage, 181, 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., & Gumbert, M. (2018). Synchronization of delta-band oscillations to syntax benefits linguistic information processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Henry, M. J., Gaston, P., Schmuck, N., & Friederici, A. D. (2016). Linguistic bias modulates interpretation of speech via neural delta-band oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4293–4302. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., Sun, Y., & Martin, A. E. (2019). Synchronous, but not entrained: Exogenous and endogenous cortical rhythms of speech and language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1693050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinaro, N., Lizarazu, M., Lallier, M., Bourguignon, M., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Out-of-synchrony speech entrainment in developmental dyslexia. Human Brain Mapping, 37(8), 2767–2783. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morillon, B., Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Arnal, L. H., Benar, C. G., Giraud, A.-L., & Bénar, C. (2012). Asymmetric function of theta and gamma activity in syllable processing: An intra-cortical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(July), 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nourski, K. V., Steinschneider, M., Rhone, A. E., Oya, H., Kawasaki, H., Howard, M. A., & McMurray, B. (2015). Sound identification in human auditory cortex: Differential contribution of local field potentials and high gamma power as revealed by direct intracranial recordings. Brain and Language, 148, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., & Kayser, C. (2019). Neural entrainment and attentional selection in the listening brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen, B. (2013). Perception as an inference problem. In M. S. Gazzaniga & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 295–304). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagnotta, M. F., Zouridakis, G., Li, L., Lizarazu, M., Lallier, M., Molinaro, N., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Low frequency overactivation in dyslexia: Evidence from resting state Magnetoencephalography. 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 6959–6962. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Palva, J. M., Palva, S., & Kaila, K. (2005). Phase synchrony among neuronal oscillations in the human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(15), 3962–3972. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4250-04.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Ince, R. A. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2015). Frontal top-down signals increase coupling of auditory low-frequency oscillations to continuous speech in human listeners. Current Biology, 25(12), 1649–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Thut, G., & Gross, J. (2018). Predictive entrainment of natural speech through two fronto-motor top-down channels. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1506589
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Gross, J., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 23(6), 1378–1387. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., Kurths, J., & Hilborn, R. C. (2002). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear science. American Journal of Physics, 70(6), 655–655. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1475332
   Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, M., Hansen, S. S., & McClelland, J. L. (2018). Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0406-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018). Proactive sensing of periodic and aperiodic auditory patterns. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(10), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochet-Capellan, A., & Fuchs, S. (2014). Take a breath and take the turn: How breathing meets turns in spontaneous dialogue. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130399. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehm, D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). The internal structure of the N400: Frequency characteristics of a language related ERP component. In Chaos and Complexity: New Research.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, M., Lindgren, M., Alter, K., & Horne, M. (2012). Time-driven effects on parsing during reading. Brain and Language, 121(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., & Fiebach, C. J. (2019). Finding the P3 in the P600: Decoding shared neural mechanisms of responses to syntactic violations and oddball targets. NeuroImage, 200, 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenhagen, J., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2014). The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned. Brain and Language, 137, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schremm, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M. (2015). Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. E., Lakatos, P., Kajikawa, Y., Partan, S., & Puce, A. (2008). Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, G. (1983). Why we need iconic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00014564
   Google Scholar
• Stefanics, G., Hangya, B., Hernádi, I., Winkler, I., Lakatos, P., & Ulbert, I. (2010). Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(41), 13578–13585. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0703-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain and Language, 86(1), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00542-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/5757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010443001646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzer, P., Adams, R. A., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Lawrie, S. M., Muckli, L., Petrovic, P., Uhlhaas, P., Voss, M., & Corlett, P. R. (2018). The Predictive Coding account of Psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 84(9), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelag, E., Von Steinbüchel, N., & Pöppel, E. (1997). Temporal processing disorders in patients with Broca’s aphasia. Neuroscience Letters, 235(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00703-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2018). Syntax with oscillators and energy levels.
   Google Scholar
• VanRullen, R. (2016). Perceptual cycles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanrullen, R., Busch, N., Drewes, J., & Dubois, J. (2011). Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(April), 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00060
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vollrath, M., Kazenwadel, J., & Krüger, H.-P. (1992). A universal constant in temporal segmentation of human speech. Naturwissenschaften, 79(10), 479–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weissbart, H., Kandylaki, K. D., & Reichenbach, T. (2019). Cortical tracking of surprisal during continuous speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissbart, H., Kandylaki, K. D., Reichenbach, T., Weißbart, H., Kandylaki, K. D., & Reichenbach, T. (2019). Cortical tracking of surprisal during continuous speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Ding, N. (2016). Time-domain analysis of neural tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures. NeuroImage, 146(July 2016), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zoefel, B., ten Oever, S., & Sack, A. T. (2018). The involvement of endogenous neural oscillations in the processing of rhythmic input: More than a regular repetition of evoked neural responses. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoefel, B., & VanRullen, R. (2016). EEG oscillations entrain their phase to high-level features of speech sound. NeuroImage, 124, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar