References
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Aleahmad, A., Amiri, H., Darrudi, E., Rahgozar, M., & Oroumchian, F. (2009). Hamshahri: A standard Persian text collection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(5), 382–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2009.05.002
- Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 285–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000123
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
- Bai, C., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Wang, L., Hung, Y.-C., Schlesewsky, M., & Burkhardt, P. (2008). Semantic composition engenders an N400: Evidence from Chinese compounds. Neuroreport,19(6), 695–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282fc1eb7
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015a). Parsimonious Mixed Models. arXiv e-prints. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015arXiv150604967B
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015b). Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bauer, L. (2008). Exocentric compounds. Morphology, 18(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9122-5
- Bertram, R., Kuperman, V., Baayen, R. H., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The hyphen as a segmentation cue in triconstituent compound processing: It's getting better all the time. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(6), 530–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00914.x
- Bertram, R., Laine, M., Harald Baayen, R., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74(2), B13–B25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00068-2
- Boudelaa, S., Pulvermuller, F., Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Arabic morphology in the neural language system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(5), 998–1010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21273
- Brooks, T. L., & Cid De Garcia, D. (2015). Evidence for morphological composition in compound words using MEG. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00215
- Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect Size in mixed effects models: A Tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
- Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257–294). Academic Press.
- Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111
- Craney, T. A., & Surles, J. G. (2002). Model-Dependent variance Inflation Factor Cutoff values. Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878
- Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1997). Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 27(2), 25–60.
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 615–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802079835
- El-Bialy, R., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2013). Processing of English compounds is sensitive to the constituents’ semantic transparency. The Mental Lexicon, 8(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.1.04elb
- Family, N. (2011). Verbal islands in Persian. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 1–30.
- Family, N. (2014). Semantic Spaces of Persian Light Verbs: A Constructionist Account: Brill Academic Pub.
- Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195503
- Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
- Ghonchepour, M. (2018). Synthetic compounding: A syntactic or morphological processing? A corpus-based study. Language Research, 10(28), 149–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22051/jlr.2017.10483.1146
- Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 127–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196148
- Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago University Press.
- Golshaie, R. (2016). A corpus study on identification and semantic classification of light verb constructions in Persian: The case of the light verb xordan ‘to eat/collide’. Language Sciences, 57(Supplement C), 21–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.05.002
- Gunther, F., Smolka, E., & Marelli, M. (2018). ‘Understanding’ differs between English and German: Capturing systematic language differences of complex words. Cortex, 116, 168-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.007
- Harald Baayen, R., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
- Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2007). Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1180, 39–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.110
- Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1612–1627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1612
- Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword Spaces facilitate Segmentation but Hinder Assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2666
- Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1), 362–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2088
- Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
- Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 291–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000133
- Karimi-Doostan, G. (2005). Light verbs and structural case. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale, 115(12), 1737–1756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.08.002
- Kilgarriff, A., Reddy, S., Pomikálek, J., & Avinesh, P. V. S. (2010). A Corpus Factory for Many Languages. LREC.
- Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in Linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation. Processing, and Impairment, 61(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1876
- Libben, G., Derwing, B. L., & de Almeida, R. G. (1999). Ambiguous Novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain and Language, 68(1), 378–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2093
- Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00520-5
- Libben, G., Goral, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). What does constituent priming mean in the investigation of compound processing? The Mental Lexicon, 13(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00001.lib
- Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
- MacGregor, L. J., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG(). Brain and Language, 126(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.002
- Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C. (2009). Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds: A constituent priming study in Italian. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.3.05mar
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 394–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004
- Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- McKinnon, R., Allen, M., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence. Neuroreport, 14(6), 883–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200305060-00022
- Momenian, M., Nilipour, R., Samar, R. G., Oghabian, M. A., & Cappa, S. (2016). Neural correlates of verb and noun processing: An fMRI study of Persian. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 37, 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.07.003
- Myers, J., Derwing, B., & Libben, G. (2004). The effect of priming direction on reading Chinese compounds. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 1, 69–86.
- Pantcheva, M. B. (2009). First phase Syntax of Persian complex Predicates: Argument structure and Telicity. Journal of South Asian Linguistics, 2(1), 53–72.
- Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-Effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.
- Pollatsek, A., Hyona, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 820–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.820
- Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 507–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689
- Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V. (2018). Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000442
- Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex Simplex words Can Be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510
- Shuanfan, H. (1998). Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J. L. Packard (Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word Formation (pp. 261–284). De Gruyter Mouton.
- Smolka, E., & Libben, G. (2017). ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of German compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1256492
- Smolka, E., Libben, G., & Dressler, W. U. (2019). When morphological structure overrides meaning: Evidence from German prefix and particle verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1552006
- Smolka, E., Preller, K. H., & Eulitz, C. (2014). ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
- Su, I. F., Mak, S. C., Cheung, L. Y., & Law, S. P. (2012). Taking a Radical position: Evidence for position-specific Radical representations in Chinese Character Recognition using masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00333
- Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 263–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9
- Tabatabaee, A. (2005). Fel-e Morakab dar Zabane Farsi (compound verb in Farsi). Nameye Farhangestan, 26, 26–34. (In Persian).
- Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the Reverse Base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477
- Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2
- Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903043261
- Whiting, C., Shtyrov, Y., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2015). Real-time functional architecture of visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00699
- Zhou, X., & Marslen-wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(6), 545–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407114
- Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 43(1), 47–66.
- Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402123