References
- Altmann, G. T. M., & Ekves, Z. (2019). Events as intersecting object histories: A new theory of event representation. Psychological Review, 126(6), 817–840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000154
- Ambrosini, E., Reddy, V., de Looper, A., Costantini, M., Lopez, B., & Sinigaglia, C. (2013). Looking ahead: Anticipatory gaze and motor ability in infancy. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067916
- Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 286–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12006
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2018). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967v2
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Beavers, J. (2008). Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925449.245
- Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Wei Tham, S. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272
- Berthele, R. (2013). Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance (pp. 55–75). John Benjamins.
- Bläsing, B. E. (2015). Segmentation of dance movement: Effects of expertise, visual familiarity, motor experience and music. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01500
- Bunger, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Event structure influences language production: Evidence from structural priming in motion event description. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.002
- Bunger, A., Skordos, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Papafragou, A. (2016). How children and adults encode causative events cross-linguistically: Implications for language production and attention. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 1015–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1175649
- Chen, J. (2018). “He killed a chicken, but it didn’t die”: An empirical study of the lexicalization of state change in Mandarin monomorphemic verbs. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 136–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.17007.che
- Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in Episodic Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
- Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
- Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., & Vincent, C. (2015). How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French. Cognitive Processing, 16(S1), 209–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0696-7
- Fausey, C. M., Long, B. L., Inamori, A., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Constructing agency: The role of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00162
- Filipović, L. (2010). Thinking and speaking about motion: Universal vs. Language-specific effects. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in Language: Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference (pp. 235–348). Editrice Testi Scientifici. http://www.edizioniets.com/scheda.asp?n=9788846729026
- Flecken, M., Carroll, M., Weimar, K., & Von Stutterheim, C. (2015). Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. The Modern Language Journal, 99(S1), 100–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12181.x
- García del Real, I. (2015). Acquisition of tense and aspect in Spanish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad del País Vasco.
- Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4
- George, N. R., Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Carving the world for language: How neuroscientific research can enrich the study of first and second language learning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39(4), 262–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2014.906602
- Gerwien, J., & von Stutterheim, C. (2018). Event segmentation: Cross-linguistic differences in verbal and non-verbal tasks. Cognition, 180, 225–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.008
- Göksun, T., Aktan-Erciyes, A., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2017). Event perception and language learning: Early interactions between language and thought. In F. N. Ketrez, A. C. Küntay, Ş. Özçalışkan, & A. Özyürek (Eds.), Trends in language acquisition research (Vol. 21, pp. 179–198). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.21.12gok
- Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Michnick Golinkoff, R. (2010). Trading spaces: Carving up events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356783
- Hard, B. M., Tversky, B., & Lang, D. S. (2006). Making sense of abstract events: Building event schemas. Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1221–1235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193267
- Hay, J., Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements.” Proceedings of the 9th semantics and linguistic theory conference, 127–144. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833
- Hindy, N. C., Altmann, G. T. M., Kalenik, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). The effect of object state-changes on event processing: Do objects compete with themselves? Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5795–5803. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6294-11.2012
- Horner, A. J., Bisby, J. A., Wang, A., Bogus, K., & Burgess, N. (2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.013
- Huff, M., Meitz, T. G. K., & Papenmeier, F. (2014). Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036780
- Jackendoff, R. (1996). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 305–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133686
- Ji, Y., & Papafragou, A. (2020). Is there an end in sight? Viewers’ sensitivity to abstract event structure. Cognition, 197, 104197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104197
- Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (2008). Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse (pp. 156–182). Oxford University Press.
- Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (Vol. 70, pp. 197–235). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_9
- Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004
- Lakusta, L., & Carey, S. (2015). Twelve-month-old Infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development, 11(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.896168
- Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
- Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2012). Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths. Cognitive Science, 36(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x
- Lawrence, Z., & Peterson, D. (2016). Mentally walking through doorways causes forgetting: The location updating effect and imagination. Memory, 24(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.980429
- Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
- Levine, D., Buchsbaum, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2019). Finding events in a continuous world: A developmental account. Developmental Psychobiology, 61(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21804
- Levine, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Pace, A., & Michnick Golinkoff, R. (2017). A goal bias in action: The boundaries adults perceive in events align with sites of actor intent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(6), 916–927. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000364
- Li, C. (2013). Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Simple syntax and complex thematic relations. Language Sciences, 37, 99–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.11.001
- Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
- Lupyan, G. (2016). The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12155
- Malaia, E. (2014). It still isn’t over: Event boundaries in language and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(3), 89–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12071
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- McNally, L. (2017). On the scalar properties and telicity of degree achievements. In O. Fernández-Soriano, E. Castroviejo, & I. Pérez-Jiménez (Eds.), Linguistik Aktuell/linguistics today (Vol. 239, pp. 174–192). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.09mcn
- Métairy, J., Lauwers, P., Enghels, R., Taverniers, M., & Van Peteghem, M. (2020). A micro-typological perspective on resultative secondary predicates: The case of nomination verb constructions. Language Sciences, 78, 101253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101253
- Monroy, C. D., Gerson, S. A., & Hunnius, S. (2017). Toddlers’ action prediction: Statistical learning of continuous action sequences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 14–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.004
- Monroy, C. D., Gerson, S. A., & Hunnius, S. (2018). Translating visual information into action predictions: Statistical learning in action and nonaction contexts. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 600–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0788-6
- Montero-Melis, G., Eisenbeiss, S., Narasimhan, B., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Kopecka, A., Lüpke, F., Nikitina, T., Tragel, I., Florian Jaeger, T., & Bohnemeyer, J. (2017). Satellite- vs. Verb-framing underpredicts nonverbal motion categorization: Insights from a large language sample and simulations. Cognitive Semantics, 3(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00301002
- Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035584
- Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34(6), 1064–1092. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01107.x
- Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108(1), 155–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007
- Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X
- Papenmeier, F., Brockhoff, A., & Huff, M. (2019). Filling the gap despite full attention: The role of fast backward inferences for event completion. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0151-2
- Papenmeier, F., Maurer, A. E., & Huff, M. (2019). Linguistic information in auditory dynamic events contributes to the detection of fine, not coarse event boundaries. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0254-9
- Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Event structure or updating disruption? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2119–2129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1101478
- Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41(1–3), 47–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-Y
- Radvansky, G. A. (2017). Event segmentation as a working memory process. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 121–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.002
- Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006
- Rappaport Hovav, M. (2016). Grammatically relevant ontological categories underlie manner/result complementarity. Proceedings of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics: 32nd Annual Meeting, 77–98. https://www.iatl.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/4RappaportHovavPaper.pdf
- Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure (pp. 21–38). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 705–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954
- Richmond, L. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Constructing experience: Event models from perception to action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(12), 962–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.005
- Sakarias, M., & Flecken, M. (2019). Keeping the result in sight and mind: General cognitive principles and language-specific influences in the perception and memory of resultative events. Cognitive Science, 43(1), e12708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12708
- Santín, M., Hobbelink, C., Flecken, M., & van Hout, A. (2020). Resultative event representations in Dutch children and adults: Does describing events help memory? Proceedings of the 44th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 508–521. http://www.lingref.com/bucld/44/BUCLD44-41.pdf
- Silvey, C., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2015). Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 212–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12150
- Skordos, D., Bunger, A., Richards, C., Selimis, S., Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. (2020). Motion verbs and memory for motion events. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5-6), 254–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1685480
- SlobinD. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Typological studies in language. Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (p. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo.
- Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (Vol. 17, pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
- Solomon, S. H., Hindy, N. C., Altmann, G. T. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2015). Competition between mutually exclusive object states in event comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2324–2338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00866
- Soroli, E., & Hickmann, M. (2010). Language and spatial representations in French and in English: Evidence from eye-movements. In G. Marotta, L. Alessandro, & M. Linda (Eds.), Space in language: Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (pp. 581–597). Editrice Testi Scientifici.
- Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00326
- Stefanowitsch, A. (2013). Variation and change in English path verbs and constructions: Usage patterns and conceptual structure. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (Vol. 41, pp. 223–244). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.10ste
- Strickland, B., & Keil, F. (2011). Event completion: Event based inferences distort memory in a matter of seconds. Cognition, 121(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.007
- Swallow, K. M., Barch, D. M., Head, D., Maley, C. J., Holder, D., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Changes in events alter how people remember recent information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1052–1064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21524
- Tai, J. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics of the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 289–296.
- Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol II: Typology and process in concept structuring (Vol. 2). MIT Press.
- Talmy, L. (2016). Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00202001
- Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2016). The cultural evolution of language. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 37–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.003
- Ünal, E., Ji, Y., & Papafragou, A. (2019). From event representation to linguistic meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, tops.12475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12475
- Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2019). How children identify events from visual experience. Language Learning and Development, 15(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1544075
- van Elk, M., Paulus, M., Pfeiffer, C., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2011). Learning to use novel objects: A training study on the acquisition of novel action representations. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1304–1314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.014
- van Hout, A. (1996). Event semantics of verb frame alternations. A case study of Dutch and its acquisition [Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University]. TILDIL Dissertations Series. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/files/178183/72745.pdf
- van Hout, A. (2016). Lexical and grammatical aspect. In J. L. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199601264.013.25
- Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371
- Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848
- Wagner, L., Yocom, A. M., & Greene-Havas, M. (2008). Children’s understanding of directed motion events in an imitation choice task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.008
- Wolff, P., Jeon, G.-H., & Li, Y. (2009). Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 167–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.009
- Woods, D. L., Kishiyama, M. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., Edwards, B., Poliva, O., Hink, R. F., & Reed, B. (2011). Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.493149
- Zacks, J. M. (2020). Event perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051101
- Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Buckner, R. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 651–655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/88486
- Zacks, J. M., Kumar, S., Abrams, R. A., & Mehta, R. (2009). Using movement and intentions to understand human activity. Cognition, 112(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.007
- Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 307–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015305
- Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
- Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-Indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x
- Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
- Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00430