Sentence-level processing predicts narrative coherence following traumatic brain injury: evidence in support of a resource model of discourse processing

References

• Adornetti, I. (2014). A neuro-cognitive perspective on the production and comprehension of discourse coherence. In P. P. Chruszczewski & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Ways to protolanguage 3 (pp. 9–24). Wydawnictwo WSF.
   Google Scholar
• Agar, M., & Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews. Discourse Processes, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538209544529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology, 14(9), 875–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030050127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, H. J., & Leland, B. (1967). Detroit tests of learning aptitude: A new instrument of mental diagnosis. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Barulli, D., & Stern, Y. (2013). Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: Emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwood, C. H. S., & Murdoch, B. E. (2013). Unravelling the influence of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) on cognitive-linguistic processing: A comparative group analysis. Brain Injury, 27(6), 671–676. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.775500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, K. R., McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. S. (1996). Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29(6), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(95)00038-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D., & Stern, Y. (2015). Traumatic brain injury and reserve. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 128, 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63521-1.00043-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] Version 5.3.04. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, W. (2011). Cohesion and coherence. In J. Zienkowski, J. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 37–49). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro, M., & Coelho, C. (2012). Communication following executive dysfunction. In R. K. Peach & L. P. Shapiro (Eds.), Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach (pp. 227–240). Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Carlomagno, S., Giannotti, S., Vorano, L., & Marini, A. (2011). Discourse information content in non-aphasic adults with brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 25(10), 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.605097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (1998). Analysis of story grammar. In L. R. Cherney, C. A. Coelho, & B. B. Shadden (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 115–122). Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(6), 1232–1248. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A., & Feinn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(13), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050500110678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosentino, E., Adornetti, I., & Ferretti, F. (2013). Processing narrative coherence: Towards a top-down model of discourse. In M. A. Finlayson, B. Fisseni, B. Löwe, & J. C. Meister (Eds.), 2013 workshop on computational models of narrative (pp. 61–75). Dagstuhl Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.61
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Coelho, C. A. (2004). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 89(3), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Despins, E. H., Turkstra, L. S., Struchen, M. A., & Clark, A. N. (2016). Sex-based differences in perceived pragmatic communication ability of adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(2), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, J. S. (1988). Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(88)90006-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Peach, R. K. (2009). Sentence planning following traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 24(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2009-0476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2011). Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1414–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.603898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2011). Productive vocabulary across discourse types. Aphasiology, 25(10), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.606974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, I. (2000). Attention, resource allocation, and language. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 348–370). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galetto, V., Andreetta, S., Zettin, M., & Marini, A. (2013). Patterns of impairment of narrative language in mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(6), 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granier, J. P., Robin, D. A., Shapiro, L. P., Peach, R. K., & Zimba, L. D. (2000). Measuring processing load during sentence comprehension: Visuomotor tracking. Aphasiology, 14(5), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new response in a Weigl type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059831
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M., & Crew, C. M. (2012). Research in language production. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 409–425). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, F., & Collins, M. (1979). Breathing, pausing and reading. Phonetica, 36(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, C., Malkmus, D., & Durham, P. (1972). Levels of cognitive functioning. Rancho Los Amigos Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haravon, A., Obler, L. K., & Sarno, M. T. (1994). A method for microanalysis of discourse in brain-damaged patients. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, & J. S. Ehlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 47–80). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, T. (2014). The psychology of language (4th. ed.). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Jensen, P. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059109008097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobbs, J. R., & Agar, M. H. (1985). The coherence of incoherent discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4(3-4), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8543004
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. (1972). Four factor index of social status [unpublished manuscript]. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M. S. (2008). Word retrieval failure episodes after traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 22(6), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701541024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, M. S., & Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 17(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/729255221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M., & Togher, L. (2009). Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly produced discourse. Brain Injury, 23(9), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050903133954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery test manual. Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery revised. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• King, K. A., Hough, M. S., Walker, M. M., Rastatter, M., & Holbert, D. (2006). Mild traumatic brain injury: Effects on naming in word retrieval and discourse. Brain Injury, 20(7), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600743824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsner, K., Dunn, J., Hird, K., Parkin, T., & Clark, C. (2002). Time for a pause … [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, Melbourne. 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., & Grafman, J. (2011). Measuring goodness of story narratives. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0022)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. S., O’Donnell, V. M., & Grossman, R. G. (1979). The Galveston orientation and amnesia test: A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167(11), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197911000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liles, B. Z., & Coelho, C. A. (1998). Cohesion analyses. In L. R. Cherney, C. A. Coelho, & B. B. Shadden (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 65–83). Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Liles, B. Z., Coelho, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(3), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5403.356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liossi, C., & Wood, R. L. (2009). Gender as a moderator of cognitive and affective outcome after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 21(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2009.21.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundine, J. P., & Barron, H. D. (2019). Microstructural and fluency characteristics of narrative and expository discourse in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(4), 1638–1648. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2007). The TalkBank project. In J. C. Beal, K. P. Corrigan, & H. L. Moisl (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora: Synchronic databases, vol. 1 (pp. 163–180). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Galetto, V., Zampieri, E., Vorano, L., Zettin, M., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). Narrative language in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 49(10), 2904–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Zettin, M., Bencich, E., Bosco, F. M., & Galetto, V. (2017). Severity effects on discourse production after TBI. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Zettin, M., & Galetto, V. (2014). Cognitive correlates of narrative impairment in moderate traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 64, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, K., Kotani, I., & Yamasato, M. (2012). Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13-14), 1723–1730. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.698789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Code, C. (Eds.). (1999). Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3001.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2008). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT), English & Spanish (version 9) [computer software]. University of Wisconsin—Madison, Waisman Center. Language Analysis Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. W., Ashman, T. A., Cantor, J. B., Krinick, R. J., & Spielman, L. A. (2010). Does gender influence cognitive outcome after traumatic brain injury? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903250928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozeiko, J., Le, K., Coelho, C., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI. Aphasiology, 25(6-7), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.543983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Ruiz, M. I., & Rallo-Fabra, L. (2009). Characteristics of mazes produced by SLI children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15(1-2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200109167632
   Google Scholar
• Niemeier, J. P., Marwitz, J. H., Lesher, K., Walker, W. C., & Bushnik, T. (2007). Gender differences in executive functions following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010600814729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K. (1992). Factors underlying neuropsychological test performance in chronic severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(4), 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3504.810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K. (1993). Clinical intervention for aphasia in the United States of America. In A. L. Holland & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 335–369). Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K. (2012). Management of acquired language disorders associated with attentional impairment. In R. K. Peach & L. P. Shapiro (Eds.), Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach (pp. 241–274). Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K. (2013). The cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties in discourse after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S285–S297. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0081)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., Beck, K. M., Gorman, M., & Fisher, C. (2019). Clinical outcomes following language-specific attention treatment versus direct attention training for aphasia: A comparative effectiveness study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(8), 2785–2811. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Coelho, C. (2016). Linking inter-and intra-sentential processes for narrative production following traumatic brain injury: Implications for a model of discourse processing. Neuropsychologia, 80, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., Nathan, M. R., & Beck, K. M. (2017). Language-specific attention treatment for aphasia: Description and preliminary findings. Seminars in Speech and Language, 38(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Schaude, B. A. (1986, November). Reformulating the notion of ‘preserved’ syntax following closed head injury [Paper presentation]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit, MI, USA. https://www.academia.edu/43534021/reformulating_the_notion_of_preserved_syntax_following_closed_head_injury
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (Eds.). (2012). Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., Shapiro, L. P., Rubin, S. S., & Schaude, B. A. (1990, November). Syntactic impairment following TBI as a function of syntactic complexity [Paper presentation]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Seattle, WA. https://www.academia.edu/43534020/Syntactic_impairment_following_TBI_as_a_function_of_syntactic_complexity
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1965). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M., Hadley, P., & Holt, J. (2008). Stalls and revisions: A developmental perspective on sentence production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(4), 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/070)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonet, M., von Roten, F. C., Spierer, L., & Barral, J. (2019). Executive control training does not generalize, even when associated with plastic changes in domain-general prefrontal areas. Neuroimage, 197, 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 17(3), 103–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616661983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer, L., Chavan, C., & Manuel, A. L. (2013). Training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(427), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00427
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern, Y. (2013). Cognitive reserve: Implications for assessment and intervention. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 65(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, C., Yorkston, K., & Pimentel, J. (2000). Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stuss, D. T., Binns, M. A., Carruth, F. G., Levine, B., Brandys, C. E., Moulton, R. J., Snow, W. G., & Schwartz, M. L. (1999). The acute period of recovery from traumatic brain injury: Posttraumatic amnesia or posttraumatic confusional state? Journal of Neurosurgery, 90(4), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thordardottir, E.T., & Weismer, S.E. (2002). Content mazes and filled pauses in narrative language samples of children with specific language impairment. Brain and Cognition, 48(2-3), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L. (2012). Clinical approaches to communication impairments due to executive dysfunction. In R. K. Peach & L. P. Shapiro (Eds.), Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach (pp. 326–345). Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• van Belle, G. (2008). Statistical rules of thumb (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1995). On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van Dijk theory. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 383–410). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32(5), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(99)00008-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale: WAIS-R manual. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Nastase, S. A., & Milivojevic, B. (2020). Narratives for neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(5), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, P. (1976). The bear and the fly. Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Koutsoftas, A. D., Capilouto, G. J., & Fergadiotis, G. (2014). Global coherence in younger and older adults: Influence of cognitive processes and discourse type. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 21(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2013.794894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, N., Pereira, N., Hermes-Pereira, A., Holz, M., Joanette, Y., & Fonseca, R. P. (2015). Executive functions profiles in traumatic brain injury adults: Implications for rehabilitation studies. Brain Injury, 29(9), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1015613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar