Eye-movements can help disentangle mechanisms underlying disfluency

References

• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 1(67), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. W., & Butterworth, B. L. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaenous speech. Language and Speech, 22(39), 201–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 592–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2014). Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1167/14.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2015). Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production. Cognitive Processing, 16(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0642-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, R. C., Holtzheimer III, P. E., Hu, X. P., & Mayberg, H. S. (2009). Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 62(6), 1619–1628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., De Baene, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). The mechanisms of determiner selection and its relation to lexical selection: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Rehrig, G. (2019). Linearisation during language production: Evidence from scene meaning and saliency maps. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1129–1139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1566562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. In Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00138-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M. (2004). The eyes are right when the mouth is wrong. Psychological Science, 15(12), 814–821. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00761.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Notebaert, L. (2010). Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haufe, S., Meinecke, F., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Haynes, J.-D., Blankertz, B., & Bießmann, F. (2014). On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 87, 96–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, J.-D., & Rees, G. (2006). Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(7), 523–534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Wang, J., Luke, S. G., & Olejarczyk, J. (2013). Predicting cognitive state from eye movements. PLoS ONE, 8(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (Willem J. M.). (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press. https://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:67053:6
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H., & Buckler-Addis, A. (1979). The eye–voice span. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25–B33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Wheeldon, L., van der Meulen, F., & Konopka, A. (2012). Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(FEB), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nozari, N., & Novick, J. (2017). Monitoring and control in language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 403–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417702419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, C. C., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self- monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(2), 163–184. 11385824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010377828778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2002). Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.5555/1953048.2078195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy-psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistono, A., Jucla, M., Barbeau, E. J., Saint-Aubert, L., Lemesle, B., Calvet, B., Köpke, B., Puel, M., & Pariente, J. (2016). Pauses during autobiographical discourse reflect episodic memory processes in early Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 50(3), 687–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistono, A., Pariente, J., Bézy, C., Lemesle, B., Le Men, J., & Jucla, M. (2019). What happens when nothing happens? An investigation of pauses as a compensatory mechanism in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 124, 133–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2018.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Flurie, M., & Ungrady, M. B. (2020). Eyetracking during picture naming predicts future vocabulary dropout in progressive anomia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1835676.
   Google Scholar
• Schnadt, M. J., & Corley, M. (2006). The influence of lexical, conceptual and planning based factors on disfluency production. 28th annual conference of the … , pp. 8–13. https://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/docs/p750.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Senoussi, M., Berry, I., VanRullen, R., & Reddy, L. (2016). Multivoxel object representations in adult human visual cortex are flexible: An associative learning study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar