References
- Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023206208142
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823 67 (1).
- Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112(2), 300–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013
- Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
- Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90022-X
- Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.
- Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I
- Bock, J. K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150
- Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16002028
- Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 833–849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009
- Cai, Z. G., M. J. Pickering, Wang, R., & Branigan, H. P. (2015). It is there whether you hear it or not: Syntactic representation of missing arguments. Cognition, 136, 255–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.017
- Chang, F., Bock, K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition, 90(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9
- Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
- Christianson, K., & Ferreira, F. (2005). Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition, 98(2), 105–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.006
- Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2018). Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000250
- Davison, A. (1984). Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic. Language, 60(4), 797–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0012
- Dik, S. C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar: The structure of the clause. Walter de Gruyter.
- Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
- Ferreira, V. S. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00523-5
- Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7-8), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824609
- Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000236
- Fleischer, Z., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2012). Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 568–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000551
- Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production Vol. 1: Speech and Talk (pp. 177–220). Academic Press.
- Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction (Vol. 1). J. Benjamins.
- Griffin, Z. M., & Weinstein-Tull, J. (2003). Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.002
- Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613
- Hardy, S. M., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2019). Structural priming is determined by Global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 720–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000754
- Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages?: Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x
- Hörberg, T., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., & Kallioinen, P. (2013). The neurophysiological correlate to grammatical function reanalysis in Swedish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 388–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.651345
- Huang, J., Pickering, M. J., Chen, X., Cai, Z., Wang, S., & Branigan, H. P. (2019). Does language similarity affect representational integration? Cognition, 185, 83–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.005
- Huang, J., Pickering, M. J., Yang, J., Wang, S., & Branigan, H. P. (2016). The independence of syntactic processing in Mandarin: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 81–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.005
- Hyönä, J., & Hujanen, H. (1997). Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in finnish: An eye fixation analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50(4), 841–858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/713755738
- Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
- Kaplan, R. M., & Bresnan, J. (1995). Formal system for grammatical representation. In M. Dalrymple, R.M. Kaplan, J.T. Maxwell, and A. Zenen (Eds.), Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar (Vol. 47, pp. 29–130). Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
- Konopka, A. E., & Bock, J. K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58(1), 68–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002
- Kristensen, L. B., Engberg-Pedersen, E., Nielsen, A. H., & Wallentin, M. (2013). The influence of context on word order processing – an fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.05.001
- Kristensen, L. B., Engberg-Pedersen, E., & Wallentin, M. (2014). Context predicts word order processing in Broca's region. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(12), 2762–2777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00681
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Lanbrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.
- Ledoux, K., Traxler, M. J., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 18(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x
- Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2011). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- Mel'čuk, I. A. (1988). Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. SUNY press.
- Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children's passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 568–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008
- O'Grady, W. (2008). The syntax files. Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii.
- Pappert, S., & Pechmann, T. (2013). Bidirectional structural priming across alternations: Evidence from the generation of dative and benefactive alternation structures in German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1303–1322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.672752
- Pappert, S., & Pechmann, T. (2014). Priming word order by thematic roles: No evidence for an additional involvement of phrase structure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2260–2278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.918632
- Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 586–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2824
- Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
- Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. University of Chicago Press.
- Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2668
- Santesteban, M., Pickering, M. J., Laka, I., & Branigan, H. P. (2015). Effects of case-marking and head position on language production? Evidence from an ergative OV language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1175–1186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1065335
- Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89(3), 179–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00119-7
- Segaert, K., Kempen, G., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2013). Syntactic priming and the lexical boost effect during sentence production and sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 124(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.003
- Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.011
- Song, Y., & Do, Y. (2018). Cross-linguistic structural priming in bilinguals: Priming of the subject-to-object raising construction between English and Korean. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001152
- Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2008). Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition, 108(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012
- Traxler, M. (2008). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.149
- Vernice, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2019). Mapping thematic roles onto grammatical functions in sentence production: Evidence from structural priming in Italian. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00044-2
- Vernice, M., Pickering, M. J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 631–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.572468
- Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2017). Basic cantonese: A grammar and workbook (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Ziegler, J., Bencini, G., Goldberg, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming. Cognition, 193, 104045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104045